Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:24:18 UTC No. 16063433

>>16063425
If you actually look at the numbers on the bottom the people with no doses have twice as much covid as the people with 3 doses

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:24:59 UTC No. 16063436

>>16063425
>Do you ever feel duped
No, because I'm not a schizo spammer like you

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:25:35 UTC No. 16063437

>>16063436
did you get your fifth covid shot yet?

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:34:20 UTC No. 16063459

>>16063433
Hmmm, that's actually not true at all.
>>16063436
Did you get your latest booster? Oh, why not? Are you some kind of antivaxxer or something?

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:34:37 UTC No. 16063461

>>16063433
Are you black?

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:35:33 UTC No. 16063465

>>16063425
Why are the trend lines different from what the numbers at the bottom suggest?

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:39:20 UTC No. 16063474

>>16063425
Vaccines don't prevent you from getting covid, they prevent you from transmitting covid to other people.

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:39:35 UTC No. 16063475

>>16063433
>Results: COVID-19 occurred in 1475 (3%) of 48 344 employees during the 100-day study period. The cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was lower in the “not up-to-date” than in the “up-to-date” state. On multivariable analysis, not being “up-to-date” with COVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower risk of COVID-19 (HR, 0.77; 95% C.I., 0.69-0.86; P-value, <0.001). Results were very similar when those 65 years and older were only considered “up-to-date” after receiving 2 doses of the bivalent vaccine.

>Conclusions: Since the XBB lineages became dominant, adults “not up-to-date” by the CDC definition have a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination, bringing into question the value of this risk classification definition.

>Summary: Among 48 344 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, those not “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination had a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “up-to-date”. The current CDC definition provides a meaningless classification of risk of COVID-19 in the adult population.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.09.23290893v1.full

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:40:40 UTC No. 16063477

>>16063474
They do not prevent you from transmitting covid. Just fuck off already.

El Arcón at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:41:03 UTC No. 16063479

>>16063425
>duped
Yes, all the time, due to the DEEP URETHRA PAIN INFLICTOR implant that I picked up when I went back to Augusta, GA after they attacked me in the Walmart parking lot at 3am when I got to Ohio.

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:42:12 UTC No. 16063481

>>16063433
>>16063465
They're measuring the rates in the population, not the gross total, you total fucking retard.

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:44:21 UTC No. 16063487

>>16063481
That doesn't make sense

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:48:21 UTC No. 16063499

>>16063487
Read the fucking study >>16063475

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:50:05 UTC No. 16063503

>>16063499
>The cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was lower in the “not up-to-date” than in the “up-to-date” state.
Well duh, most employees were probably up to date
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Per_capita

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:57:11 UTC No. 16063516

>>16063503
Yes, and as the study concludes, the more "up-to-date" you are, the higher likelihood you are of becoming infected with covid.

No refunds.

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:58:38 UTC No. 16063518

>>16063433
>>16063465
>>16063487
See: (proportion)

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 21:02:31 UTC No. 16063531

>>16063516
I think he means that the not-up-to-date group was way smaller so their rate of incidence is more unreliable.

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 21:06:54 UTC No. 16063536

>>16063531
>I don't like the data so I'm just going to ignore it and assume it's misleading

No refunds.

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 21:09:29 UTC No. 16063545

>>16063425
Those morons are too retarded to understand they are fucked for life.

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 21:21:31 UTC No. 16063577

>>16063536
>I don't like the data so I'm just going to ignore it and assume it's misleading
Pot kettle.

Anonymous at Fri, 8 Mar 2024 21:26:23 UTC No. 16063591

>>16063577
Have you stayed up-to-date on your covid boosters, anon? Oh, why not?

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 01:10:18 UTC No. 16063962

>>16063577
>>16063591
As I thought. You don't want to answer that question, do you? Opens up a whole can of worms, mentally and morally.

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 01:17:24 UTC No. 16063980

>>16063487
CHIRP!

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 05:43:35 UTC No. 16064455

>>16063425
Vaxxies, this is your mindset

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 18:20:37 UTC No. 16065246

Every person under, say, 60 (they were scared, and fuck em anyway) who recieved even a single dose of a covid vaccine should be put into a re-education program for truth and reconciliation. They should also be reminded of their utterly pointless and irrational decision every day for the rest of their lives.