Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 09:22:12 UTC No. 16064718

>>16064715
I don't know enough about "repair cells" / endogenous cell repair to answer this question

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 19:55:25 UTC No. 16065398

>>16064715
yes. Don't know how you'd ensuring everything was aligned to 1nm, but if you could, everything including nerves would probably grow back ok. Still get scar tissue formation, might make tendons weaker, might throw off nerve healing

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 20:09:43 UTC No. 16065423

>>16064715
What does this have to do with a universal compression algorithm running on Maid Machines?

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 20:11:40 UTC No. 16065425

>>16065423
That was proved impossible so we are moving onto cutting peoples arms off

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 22:11:10 UTC No. 16065584

>>16064715
Please don't do mean things!
I think you are a nice person.

I have felt lonely before (I think you know what I mean). The bad feeling will go away over time. You should not feel bad.
I believe you can do it.
Please don't hurt anyone!

>would full recovery be achieved?
No

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 22:40:24 UTC No. 16065606

>>16065584
Also please don't hurt yourself!
Even if things feel meaningless, there are still other nice things to do.

Do you still hear commands? Don't listen to them. They are evil and you know they are.

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 22:45:14 UTC No. 16065613

>>16064715
The smallest functional unit of cell adhesions would be intercellular junctions at around 200x30nm - 200x100nm, destroy enough of them you'd have to deal with scar tissue. A phospholipid molecule is around 0,5x2nm. Assuming you kept the arm perfectly in place throughout the cut, wouldn't hit a significant amount of junctions or nuclei and just cut a clean line through billions of phospholipidmembranes they'd probably just reassamble. Your bone might have to built an tiny callus.

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 00:02:05 UTC No. 16065742

Arms are routinely reattached, with functional tendons. Peripheral nerves do grow back in time

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 17:51:51 UTC No. 16066704

Schizo thread

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 19:57:55 UTC No. 16066895

>>16066704
At least its unique schizo shit instead of choosing from the grab bag of 5 acceptable schizo topics and posting them daily like they usually do here

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 19:59:12 UTC No. 16066899

>>16066895
too small to be much of a grab bag, it's more like russian roulette but 5/5 chambers are loaded

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 21:08:01 UTC No. 16067023

>>16065613
Wtf are you saying

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:20:12 UTC No. 16067942

>>16064715
Oh, you've got to be kidding me with this ridiculous hypothetical scenario. Are you seriously asking if someone's arm would magically reattach itself if you sawed it off with a fancy laser and then stuck it back on like a damn LEGO piece? Give me a break. First of all, let's address the sheer absurdity of your premise. A "nanometer laser"? Really? I don't care how precise your imaginary cutting tool is, severing someone's arm is going to cause massive trauma, blood loss, and tissue damage. You can't just plug it back in and expect everything to be hunky-dory.
Even if, by some miracle, you managed to align all the blood vessels, nerves, and tissues perfectly (which is laughably impossible), the body's natural healing processes don't work like that. Reattaching a severed limb requires extensive surgical intervention, including reconnecting arteries, veins, nerves, muscles, and bone. It's not a simple matter of lining things up and hoping for the best. Also, the idea that you could keep a severed arm "perfectly still for a month" is just asinine. Even with the most advanced medical technology and immobilization techniques, there would still be micro-movements and shifts that would disrupt the healing process. And that's not even considering the risk of infection, tissue necrosis, and a host of other complications that would inevitably arise.
But let's say, for the sake of argument, that you somehow overcame all these obstacles. Even then, the chances of "full recovery" are slim to none. Reattached limbs often have reduced function, sensation, and range of motion, even with extensive physical therapy and rehabilitation. The idea that someone could just walk away from a traumatic amputation with no lasting effects is pure fantasy.
In short, your question is so utterly divorced from reality that it barely merits a response. Put down the sci fi novels and start studying actual science, faggot

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:25:18 UTC No. 16067946

>>16067942
chatgpt?

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:13:07 UTC No. 16068040

>>16066895
this

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:47:21 UTC No. 16068078

>>16067946
My thoughts exactly.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 14:38:30 UTC No. 16068138

>>16067942
How small must the incision be?

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:12:57 UTC No. 16068184

>>16067942
Did you actually take OP's stupid fantasy seriously?

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:33:51 UTC No. 16068217

>>16067023
If we're talking a 1nm incision, that's laughably small, it's 1/20000 the size of an average human cell. To create scaring in functional tissue you have to destroy cell adhesion to a certain degree, which tends to happend with cuts or erosions or "large" scale necrotic cell death. A 1nm slice through a cell might not even cause enough damage to significantly impair it's function, let alone dissolve the adhesion of particular network of cells.