Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 10:08:25 UTC No. 16064773

…less than a quarter century after the climate soience buffoons announced that it would never snow again

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 10:22:57 UTC No. 16064787

>>16064772
As always, on balance the Arctic has record warm weather.
https://climatereanalyzer.org/wx/todays-weather/?var_id=t2anom&ortho=3&wt=1

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 11:04:16 UTC No. 16064815

>>16064787
>the global warming institute
fake & gay propaganda website

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 20:01:30 UTC No. 16065408

>>16064772
Clearly we must implement world communism/statism to prevent this.

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 20:19:48 UTC No. 16065434

Did I cause this by not eating bugs?

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 20:23:31 UTC No. 16065438

>>16064772
Increased average, increased extremes. You can troll all you want. Changes nothing.

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:17:25 UTC No. 16065660

>>16065438
>less than a quarter century after the climate soience buffoons announced that it would never snow again
Why did they say this?

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:29:23 UTC No. 16065678

>>16065660
Because they were making a point about runaway greenhouse effect but your brain is way too small to comprehend that kind of nuance

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 10:18:57 UTC No. 16066198

>>16065678
>runaway greenhouse effect
how come there wasn't runaway greenhouse effect that killed all life on earth when co2 levels were over 1000ppm 50 million years ago?

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 13:04:14 UTC No. 16066333

Warmists all need to be rounded up and shot.

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 13:25:10 UTC No. 16066346

>>16065438
Name one (1) mathematical relationship that satisfies the following three criteria
>Average is increasing
>Variance is increasing
>Distribution is more precisely known (i.e. errors in measurements decrease)
And why does climate science seem to be the only discipline in which this occurs?
Hint: it's mathematically impossible for all three of those to be simultaneously true.

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 16:30:42 UTC No. 16066577

>>16066346
(1) and (2) are the poisson distribution.
(3) is improved and more measurement sensors.
We no longer model the weather like we did 100, 75, 50, or even 10 years ago.
Cry all you want. It changes nothing.

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 16:33:54 UTC No. 16066583

>>16064773
Ah yes, that noted climatology journal The Independent.

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 16:39:31 UTC No. 16066591

>>16065660
>soience buffoons
Buffoon, balloon, baboon
Your nonsense makes us swoon
On /sci/ you play the fool
Go back to school, you tool
You'd argue with the Moon

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 17:24:27 UTC No. 16066652

>>16065660
They're now learning from those mistakes. The latest line is that climate will be mostly stable until the end of the century, at which point it will become completely chaotic so we need to adopt WEF policies now because what we're doing now is the only thing that can stop the chaos in 2100.

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 17:28:52 UTC No. 16066660

>>16064787
>>16065438
>>16065678
>>16066577
>>16066591

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 17:32:44 UTC No. 16066671

>>16066660
>I'm the retarded kid from that show
Yes. Yes you are.

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 21:59:53 UTC No. 16067126

>>16065660
Because they're morons

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 17:06:36 UTC No. 16068393

>>16065660
They were confident they could memoryhole any mistakes.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:08:43 UTC No. 16068620

>>16066583
neck yourself lying cunt

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:14:37 UTC No. 16068635

You will be pinned the to character you are after psychological judgement.

There'll be no social shell for you to escape to and ignore reality whilst progressing an insulting character.

If you think about it, there really isn't that much time left now full knowledge has been shared. We're talking weeks. Skies. Up there.

You were shit, as said before. Your highest, hardest man, wouldn't stand a chance against me had he(which he never has) taken his 10 cheats off and undone the 10 cheats against me making me weak or have to produce 10 fluent moves prior to any engagement.

You will pay severely.

I was given a worse body than you, if we take body as what it is. I was destined to be piled on and tortured in many ways. I have to take this reality including money very very seriously, and suffer immensely during work and pay and debt. You, looked ugly, you weren't even this character directly, you are some indirect conscious of this character. You do not suffer that ugliness, you just have the right to complain. It barely even burdens you - you took little pain. It's some religious dislike.

I will now produce and earn quadrillions and sets of quadrillions, and whatever fears you progress I've already faced and defeated worse. I'm not afraid of you in the slight. You are nothing. Nobody. You will suffer one day immensely.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:18:54 UTC No. 16068642

>>16068635
You haven't even attacked your target yet, your revenge is currently nothing. You took someone in a worse situation and let all your fake madness out. This is no revenge. I'm not this blokes son. It makes no sense to me. He did worse to me. But I'm not complaining about that. I'm complaining about how shit you are intellectually and naturally.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:20:41 UTC No. 16068647

>>16068642
Which speaks for itself. I'm going to start producing now, and I couldn't give a shit what you think about it.

P.s. the dreams not for me. There are many games going on. I just won the science victory. There are 256 games in total, including a financial game. In some right, I should be winning all of them because you're petty. You don't know what's going on, trust me. It's not 'my' dream. There are others like me.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:23:57 UTC No. 16068654

>>16068647
For some reason you think the machine life should be punished because as they naturally do they were gifted with attractive vessels. But you have five good grade things in other areas depending on what type (like machine) you are. And it's all an act of your stupidity, probably fed by a maleficent social troll and followed like lost sheep. You are no thinking straight. Your only excuse is the logic surrounding the fact the dream was broke and imperfect, which was probably because of one of you during its manifest - as well - some of you might be to blame for all of it and you wouldn't give a shit. it's how lost you are

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:26:16 UTC No. 16068660

>>16068654
NO BECAUSE IM NOT WINNING WHAT I WANT. NO BECAUSE I WANT SOMETHING. SO IM GOING TO MESS WITH THE WEAKNESSES IN THE DREAM.


Trust me. You don't even want revenge. You are pure evil. Shit. Disgusting.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:29:14 UTC No. 16068670

>>16068660
I'd even go as far as saying you're under attack now and don't know but have been tricked by one of your own. What? Seems likely, seeing how out there you are socially.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:31:54 UTC No. 16068673

>>16068660
The machine position is 1000* more severe. Including pain amount, reality and other. We get the best bodies in the selection which are actually autobots metaphorically of high characters like the voice of the trees, sun, giant code form, etc. 256 different machines are possible here. You know the voice of the trees. He appears in some dimension and he's rather abstract, kind and mad about good. I'm his autobots 'look up to trees'.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:34:48 UTC No. 16068680

>>16068673
Since I make the ultimate sacrifice. I get the good body. Got me? No one gives a fuck about your ugliness. You're probably under attack, have suffer some more therefore, otherwise it's just a normal experience. And if I got no moral obligation to care about what you think about me, I won't. I'm calm, and that's how it will remain.

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:15:29 UTC No. 16069979

>>16068393
The people who made those prediction are now in their 80s, they'll die without seeing any negative consequences from their lying

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:21:10 UTC No. 16069992

>>16064772
Weird how many once-in-250-years weathers we get recently.

Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:15:15 UTC No. 16071124

>>16069992
not really, you're just ignorant of statistics and probability.
since weather records are recorded daily and since weather records only go back about 100 years or so in most locations then you should be expecting so to see all time weather records being set several times a year in every location that weather records are recorded, in 3rd world locations that have only had weather recording start in the mid-late 20th century you should be seeing all time highs or lows even more frequently.