Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 11:02:39 UTC No. 16064812

>>16064791
1. Dog breeds aren't analogous to races
2. Yes, in theory, you could create human breeds. It would just take many lifetimes and be unethical as all fuck.
3. Humans fight just fine. We're the dominant predator on earth and kill each other constantly.

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 11:39:31 UTC No. 16064835

>>16064791
I think we've already done the same with people. If anything we need to breed more total wussies so we don't have to deal with wars or getting bullied or any of that junk

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 11:41:56 UTC No. 16064838

>>16064812
>1. Dog breeds aren't analogous to races
Why?

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 12:00:24 UTC No. 16064846

>>16064791
1. already happened
2. bunch of bullshit came out of it
3. makes more sense to do it with an AGI companion. more advanced.

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 12:09:31 UTC No. 16064857

can science breed a more racist dog?

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 20:41:55 UTC No. 16065471

>>16064838
Because humans haven't been selectively bred and because how they are socially constructed is different.

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 20:45:01 UTC No. 16065476

>>16064791
Yes but good luck finding someone working on eugenics in the modern day

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 20:54:32 UTC No. 16065490

>>16064791
Yeah, it's called the Irish travelers

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 21:08:13 UTC No. 16065501

>>16064838
because race as a concept was invented by white supremacists to separate themselves from nonwhite people

>pic related
all these men are of varying "races" (as defined by the white supremacists), but they're all in the top 1% in terms of power, explosiveness, speed, discipline/training, aggression, etc. genetically speaking.
you could say they all belong to a particular "breed" of human, despite being different "races" (as defined by the white supremacists).

Anonymous at Sat, 9 Mar 2024 21:43:27 UTC No. 16065553

>>16064791
Dog breeds are a social construct

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 02:14:33 UTC No. 16065886

>>16064791
Hypothetically, yes, but it's probably going to take many generations to produce results. You need to get the DNA from people that are stronger, faster, and have more stamina than average, put them into empty eggs, and let those eggs gestate in women's wombs. Choose the most promising children and repeat the process with them once they're mature. If you want control as well, you need to find people with calm and submissive temperaments, similar to dogs, and breed them the same way.

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 02:22:30 UTC No. 16065894

>>16064791
>science/evolution doesn’t apply to humans
Liberals cope

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 02:31:28 UTC No. 16065902

>>16065501
>>pic related
>all these men are of one "race" (or two in case of jews) (as dictated by common sense), but they're all in the top 1% in terms of intelligence, etc. genetically speaking. Notice the absence of melanin enriched individuals.

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 02:32:36 UTC No. 16065907

>>16065902
Forgot pic!

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 20:52:34 UTC No. 16066989

>>16065501
>white supremacists
>non-white people
Funny, you seem to have no trouble identifying people by race.

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 20:54:09 UTC No. 16066993

>>16065501
>all these men are of varying "races" (as defined by the white supremacists)
But you had no trouble identifying them yourself. lmao

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 20:57:38 UTC No. 16066998

>>16065907
The Gaza war has ripped your mask is off, kike. You're the most genocidal racists on the planet, and the most shameless hypocrites.

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 23:36:49 UTC No. 16067292

>>16064838
>"1. Dog breeds aren't analogous to races"
>Why?
A lot of reasons. This article covers a few and has to be somewhat long just to do that.
https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12052-019-0109-y

Anyway >>16064812 is right, it would just take a long ass time and extreme selection pressures akin to what we've generally done with dogs.

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 23:41:02 UTC No. 16067297

>>16066998
I am not a jew, I dislike jews just as much as I dislike muslims. Both should just exterminate each other.

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 23:43:51 UTC No. 16067298

>>16066998
I think they exaggerated it to send a message to all antisemites. as in get the hint

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:41 UTC No. 16067317

>>16064791
>If we can breed special races of dogs for fighting, can we do the same with people?
Yes we could and it does happen organically(hot blooded latinos, crime prone low iq blacks, etc)

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:43:07 UTC No. 16067360

>>16067317
>Yes we could and it does happen organically(hot blooded latinos, crime prone low iq blacks, etc)
As human populations are clinal from serial founder effects and continuous gene flow, and human variation is largely overlapping between groups, you really can't attribute stereotypes like you have to "group genetic differences". Contradicts everything we know about population genetics and would obviously show up as the strongest selection signals instead of the usual things like pathogen adaptations.

So while variations explain individual differences, overlayed atop one another the relative frequencies and proportions between groups are too similar to explain "group" differences. So while it "could happen", as with parapatric speciation, all of our evidence to date shows that did not happen with humans.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:46:22 UTC No. 16067719

>>16067360
>So while it "could happen", as with parapatric speciation, all of our evidence to date shows that did not happen with humans.

>Don't trust your own eyes goy, trust our basedence instead.
I've lived too long near greeks, turks, gypsies and russian to know you're full of shit

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:55:23 UTC No. 16067726

>>16067719
Even if true you'd be ignoring phenotypic plasticity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenotypic_plasticity
Your experience doesn't suggest the science is wrong. You just don't know anything about genetics and seem to think genotype-phenotype is a 1:1 linear map.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 08:07:53 UTC No. 16067743

>>16067726
>muh plasticity
The behavior and physical characteristics of certain populations of humans has been recorded for literally millennia as different than other groups and even to this day they act that way. Get your head out of your books and look around you, you brain dead retard.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 08:27:48 UTC No. 16067763

>>16067743
The eternal irony of anti-science "common sense" dogmatists wasting everyone's time trolling a science board. You might as well say the earth is flat because "it looks that way to me".

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 08:45:30 UTC No. 16067773

>>16064791
thats what dune is about

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 08:51:56 UTC No. 16067778

>>16067726
Translation: the taxonomy of breeds, subspecies and races is so arbitrarily decided and kept that way so that at any time we want we can pull out the "it's the socioeconomic factors doing it" cards as to not offend whoever the current funders are.
This is a geneticists equivalent to political "scientists" redefining the term "racism" to exclude minorities from it.
I hope all you quacks get defunded until you grow a spine and a brain

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:00:23 UTC No. 16067781

>>16067778
"Everything showing I'm wrong is the product of a conspiracy!"
Really what is it about this brain rot that lends itself to being unable to realize you share essential qualities with flat-earthers? Maybe grow that uncomfortable inkling of a sensation you're just as embarrassingly wrong as they are for the same reasons?

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:01:00 UTC No. 16067782

why haven't scientists bred a special breed of dog for fucking? you'd think they would since they all love fucking dogs so much

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:32:46 UTC No. 16067801

>>16067781
>you share essential qualities with flat-earthers?
nice well poisoning, use it again, maybe it will stick the 3rd time

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:08:52 UTC No. 16067842

>>16067801
You poisoned the well yourself. In response to explanation, you literally went with "it's a conspiracy".
>This is a geneticists equivalent to political "scientists" redefining the term "racism" to exclude minorities from it.
A conspiracy. This is literally what you wrote. Pointing out the well has poison in it already is not poisoning the well. What kind of reasoning is this? Communist China? To speak truth of the flaw is to have caused it?

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:51:16 UTC No. 16067906

>>16064857
All dogs can be trained to be racist. Very easily, in fact. If you want one to be born naturally racist that's probably impossible.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 12:47:11 UTC No. 16068021

>>16065902
>>16065907
>>16066998
>>16067297
lol what a /pol/tard freakout mess. these people are so subhuman they can't even avoid biting at each other even when trying to present a united /pol/tard front.