๐๏ธ ๐งต Why are you goyims so sexist?
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 09:06:55 UTC No. 16066145
Science says that Hollywood's propaganda & brainwashing movies are unpopular because you're a bigot.
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 09:25:49 UTC No. 16066161
>>16066145
that's not science, just like you can push your agenda through movie so can you on your studies, and biased studies are a disgrace.
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 10:14:37 UTC No. 16066192
>>16066145
Hollywood movies are unpopular because they are awful. Typical is technical perfection combined with human side catastrophe.
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:13:38 UTC No. 16066739
>>16066145
The article should have at least compared movies of similar theme and seriousness.
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:16:54 UTC No. 16066744
sexism, racism, and anti-semitism are badges of honor in a society that denies basic biology and natural selection.
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 21:54:13 UTC No. 16067115
why is phys.org devoting itself to promoting jewish propaganda films?
isn't it supposed to be a science website?
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 22:01:00 UTC No. 16067129
>>16066145
There are about 170 million females in the US and over four billion worldwide. If most females watched female lead movies, they'd smash the records of every other movie ever made. But females don't watch female lead movies in large numbers. They mostly watch male lead movies. Somehow this means men are sexist.
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 22:14:35 UTC No. 16067155
how the fuck to they afford to lose so much money without abandoning the brainwash? how much can they afford to pull this shit? anything else would have long been dead and buried. who fucking supports this shit, financially?
Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 17:35:58 UTC No. 16068505
>>16067115
its a brainwashing and shilling website, just like everything else in science and academia these days
Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 17:39:58 UTC No. 16068523
>>16066145
>phys.org
>more than 50% of articles shilled on the front page are biology/medicine
you can see they're into junk science.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:54:03 UTC No. 16069785
>>16066145
im open to the mesage of this article but oppenbarbie is a poor example, oppenheimer was always going to be more successful in awards season because of what type of film it is
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:46:14 UTC No. 16069881
>>16066145
"Goyim" is already plural, goy
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:08:55 UTC No. 16070076
>>16069881
>"Goyim" is already plural, goy
Barkon at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:12:44 UTC No. 16070087
>>16070076
You are this. This picture is you.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:16:08 UTC No. 16070345
>>16067129
it's called internalized misogyny, chud. educate yourself.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:27:55 UTC No. 16070550
>>16067115
most of academia is bullshit. that's why I didn't go to it after college by getting my PhD. it became clear during my senior year at college. it's all ass kissing and politics. it's all trying to do whatever to get grants and get and stay in a click. it happens that all those with power are left wing douches so that's the thing to be. it's sad that it's all about nonsense and the science is an afterthought. we'd be so much farther in terms of research if it wasn't held back by faggots. you can't have an original idea without everyone laughing and shunning you. the science field is very close minded
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:44:21 UTC No. 16070787
>>16067129
The men aren't watching the movies with female leads.
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 22:05:51 UTC No. 16070826
>>16070550
>My idea wasn't shit, it was... original! I was just held back by these left wing douches calling the shots everywhere!
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:17:13 UTC No. 16071248
>>16070550
People in academia are low IQ, they get jealous and angry when someone contradicts their soience dogma
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:43:22 UTC No. 16073000
>>16071248
>did you say something contrary to muh holy textbood!?!?
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 04:36:05 UTC No. 16073473
>>16067155
they print the money
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 22:03:41 UTC No. 16077906
>>16071248
The Warwick Collins story
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 05:25:03 UTC No. 16078660
>>16066161
Thats what science is these days. Your fairy tale perfect science conducted by honest researchers who have no hidden agendas doesn't exist outside of your imaginary fantasyland
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 20:41:35 UTC No. 16079875
>>16078660
The media shills that fairytale version constantly in order to help make the scientists' lie be more effective
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 10:24:20 UTC No. 16080936
>>16079875
They also teach kids in school about "The Scientific Method" because it helps trick them into believing in soiyence junk.
In IRL nobody follows "The Scientific Method"
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:47:41 UTC No. 16081999
>>16080936
They do the same thing with ideas like "journalistic ethics" which the teach children about in order to trick them into believing tv news and "the Hippocratic oath" which kids learn about, but no doctors follow.