Image not available

1080x3340

ye8qhq.jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ ๐Ÿงต Why are you goyims so sexist?

Anonymous No. 16066145

Science says that Hollywood's propaganda & brainwashing movies are unpopular because you're a bigot.

Anonymous No. 16066161

>>16066145
that's not science, just like you can push your agenda through movie so can you on your studies, and biased studies are a disgrace.

Anonymous No. 16066192

>>16066145
Hollywood movies are unpopular because they are awful. Typical is technical perfection combined with human side catastrophe.

Anonymous No. 16066739

>>16066145
The article should have at least compared movies of similar theme and seriousness.

Anonymous No. 16066744

sexism, racism, and anti-semitism are badges of honor in a society that denies basic biology and natural selection.

Anonymous No. 16067115

why is phys.org devoting itself to promoting jewish propaganda films?
isn't it supposed to be a science website?

Anonymous No. 16067129

>>16066145
There are about 170 million females in the US and over four billion worldwide. If most females watched female lead movies, they'd smash the records of every other movie ever made. But females don't watch female lead movies in large numbers. They mostly watch male lead movies. Somehow this means men are sexist.

Anonymous No. 16067155

how the fuck to they afford to lose so much money without abandoning the brainwash? how much can they afford to pull this shit? anything else would have long been dead and buried. who fucking supports this shit, financially?

Anonymous No. 16068505

>>16067115
its a brainwashing and shilling website, just like everything else in science and academia these days

Anonymous No. 16068523

>>16066145
>phys.org
>more than 50% of articles shilled on the front page are biology/medicine
you can see they're into junk science.

Anonymous No. 16069785

>>16066145
im open to the mesage of this article but oppenbarbie is a poor example, oppenheimer was always going to be more successful in awards season because of what type of film it is

Anonymous No. 16069881

>>16066145
"Goyim" is already plural, goy

Image not available

1488x1488

ajjakkk.jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16070076

>>16069881
>"Goyim" is already plural, goy

Barkon No. 16070087

>>16070076
You are this. This picture is you.

Anonymous No. 16070345

>>16067129
it's called internalized misogyny, chud. educate yourself.

Anonymous No. 16070550

>>16067115
most of academia is bullshit. that's why I didn't go to it after college by getting my PhD. it became clear during my senior year at college. it's all ass kissing and politics. it's all trying to do whatever to get grants and get and stay in a click. it happens that all those with power are left wing douches so that's the thing to be. it's sad that it's all about nonsense and the science is an afterthought. we'd be so much farther in terms of research if it wasn't held back by faggots. you can't have an original idea without everyone laughing and shunning you. the science field is very close minded

Anonymous No. 16070787

>>16067129
The men aren't watching the movies with female leads.

Anonymous No. 16070826

>>16070550
>My idea wasn't shit, it was... original! I was just held back by these left wing douches calling the shots everywhere!

Anonymous No. 16071248

>>16070550
People in academia are low IQ, they get jealous and angry when someone contradicts their soience dogma

Image not available

2756x2756

1702411073089.jpg

Anonymous No. 16073000

>>16071248
>did you say something contrary to muh holy textbood!?!?

Anonymous No. 16073473

>>16067155
they print the money

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16077906

>>16071248
The Warwick Collins story

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16078660

>>16066161
Thats what science is these days. Your fairy tale perfect science conducted by honest researchers who have no hidden agendas doesn't exist outside of your imaginary fantasyland

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16079875

>>16078660
The media shills that fairytale version constantly in order to help make the scientists' lie be more effective

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16080936

>>16079875
They also teach kids in school about "The Scientific Method" because it helps trick them into believing in soiyence junk.
In IRL nobody follows "The Scientific Method"

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16081999

>>16080936
They do the same thing with ideas like "journalistic ethics" which the teach children about in order to trick them into believing tv news and "the Hippocratic oath" which kids learn about, but no doctors follow.