Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:17:39 UTC No. 16066746
>>16066743
Booty
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:22:00 UTC No. 16066750
i'm 12 and what is this
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:22:37 UTC No. 16066751
>>16066743
Very non-scientific if you ask me...
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:23:41 UTC No. 16066752
>>16066743
But I can't take my eyes off of that disproportionate protrusion..
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:24:45 UTC No. 16066754
>>16066743
it's like... if it were a celestial body it would be black and have quite the gravity well if you know what I mean...
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:25:34 UTC No. 16066756
>>16066743
this will stay up 20 more minutes at least.
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:29:51 UTC No. 16066757
>>16066754
That's an interesting simile. I was thinking of "big science" projects such as ITER, a one-way vortex for money.
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:32:51 UTC No. 16066762
>>16066743
Serious question,is this shit really worth it, given immense, unimaginable prowess in STEM in a subject of your choice ie Math, Physics etc, natural talent,stem glory since childhood,.olympiads, ap honours etc etc vs a chad with harem of every girl you like since age 13, which is better
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:35:55 UTC No. 16066766
>>16066762
i think that's a pretty evenly weighted choice, some people would choose either one.
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:37:05 UTC No. 16066767
>>16066756
You're right!
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:37:08 UTC No. 16066768
>>16066762
is knowledge and achievement more important or is animalistic desires and sex more important, waow, its like I'm really there
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:38:49 UTC No. 16066772
>>16066762
Yes, in the next war it is worth being an engineer in a comfortable office rather than Chad McKnucklehead serving as cannon fodder.
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:38:58 UTC No. 16066773
Coffee consumption and health: umbrella review of meta-analyses of multiple health outcomes
The umbrella review identified 201 meta-analyses of observational research with 67 unique health outcomes and 17 meta-analyses of interventional research with nine unique outcomes. Coffee consumption was more often associated with benefit than harm for a range of health outcomes across exposures including high versus low, any versus none, and one extra cup a day. There was evidence of a non-linear association between consumption and some outcomes, with summary estimates indicating largest relative risk reduction at intakes of three to four cups a day versus none, including all cause mortality (relative risk 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.88), cardiovascular mortality (0.81, 0.72 to 0.90), and cardiovascular disease (0.85, 0.80 to 0.90). High versus low consumption was associated with an 18% lower risk of incident cancer (0.82, 0.74 to 0.89). Consumption was also associated with a lower risk of several specific cancers and neurological, metabolic, and liver conditions. Harmful associations were largely nullified by adequate adjustment for smoking, except in pregnancy, where high versus low/no consumption was associated with low birth weight (odds ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.67), preterm birth in the first (1.22, 1.00 to 1.49) and second (1.12, 1.02 to 1.22) trimester, and pregnancy loss (1.46, 1.06 to 1.99). There was also an association between coffee drinking and risk of fracture in women but not in men.
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:40:00 UTC No. 16066776
>>16066762
This is news to me. Where does one get to make such a choice?
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:41:34 UTC No. 16066778
>>16066773
kek
i guess they finally answered the age old question
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:43:21 UTC No. 16066779
>>16066773
my god it's such a junk science.