Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 22:51:10 UTC No. 16067226

>>16066929
probably the same way when realizing they cant recreate the satvrn v rocket

like how long would've it take to do that moose in plaster?

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 23:32:04 UTC No. 16067288

>>16066929
easy to build, but imagine trying to get funding from congress for anything more than gibs.

Anonymous at Sun, 10 Mar 2024 23:34:00 UTC No. 16067290

>>16066929
you can build them if you have the resources for it.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:06:05 UTC No. 16067321

>>16066929
we can make buildings like this
they just choose not too
why? idk
making a soulless glass cube is easy

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:08:25 UTC No. 16067322

It just shows knowledge, technology and crafts are oral traditions.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 01:58:07 UTC No. 16067425

>>16067288
>easy to build
>t. i have never built anything

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 04:58:52 UTC No. 16067611

>>16066929
We can't build them because only hideous demoralising architecture is allowed anymore

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 05:30:25 UTC No. 16067626

>>16066929
so when are we going to see an ancient aliens episode about it?

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 06:26:59 UTC No. 16067657

>>16067611
If you get demoralized by buildings you must be a fucking pussy

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 06:31:42 UTC No. 16067660

>>16067425
i've built several threads on 4chan, made a few mods, and i even built my own clock.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 18:59:41 UTC No. 16068720

>>16067611
>we can get more shekels from the goyims if we only build the lowest quality architecture possible

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 19:25:15 UTC No. 16068757

>>16066929
We absolutely can build buildings like these, and we know this because we still perform maintenance on the existing beautiful architectural works like this to this day.

In terms of why don't we make more beautiful architectural structures, I think it has to do with a combination of efficiency and funding. It's easier to heat/cool, run power and plumbing, weatherproof etc. some soulless skyscraper than it is a geometrically complicated work of art.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 21:58:05 UTC No. 16068959

>>16066929
>How do civil engineers cope with the fact we can't build these buildings today using our technology?
/pol/ has fucking ruined this board

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 23:57:21 UTC No. 16069170

Aren't those temporary structures for a fair?

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:11:27 UTC No. 16069181

>>16066929
Engineering is always moving to work with less while still meeting objectives. We could very easily make those buildings today. Instead we make taller and larger buildings for cheaper. You can argue aesthetics, but you don't hate modern architecture. You hate the decline of the current empire.

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 03:41:10 UTC No. 16069449

>>16066929
That's a problem for architects and urban planners. As an engineer, you should be able to tell exactly why this type of construction isn't more proeminent, given that a large part of your job involves optimising the use of resources.

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:57:47 UTC No. 16069954

>>16067626
kek

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 13:03:46 UTC No. 16069961

>>16069170
All structures are temporary.