Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:58:49 UTC No. 16067827

>>16067811
dude, the global covid ""pandemic"" has been declared based on 83 positive cases outside of china, that's about half a case per country, and almost nobody has raised an eyebrow. scientists are retarded shills.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:47:41 UTC No. 16067902

>>16067827
That's not true. We already had thousands of cases in Europe before the pandemic was declares. However, they didn't tell us that it was no worse than a normal seasonal flu.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:00:30 UTC No. 16067916

>>16067902
Right, they've actually declared it a "public health emergency of international concern".
>it was no worse than a normal seasonal flu
Because it WAS normal seasonal flu.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:09:20 UTC No. 16067925

>>16067827
Wow, where do I even begin with this brilliant display of ignorance and arrogance? Your post is a shining example of the Dunning-Kruger effect in action, and I can't help but marvel at the sheer audacity of your claims.

First of all, your dismissal of the global COVID-19 pandemic as a "pandemic" (nice scare quotes, by the way) based on the number of cases outside of China is laughably naive. It's almost as if you have no understanding of how infectious diseases spread or the concept of exponential growth. But hey, I'm sure your extensive expertise in epidemiology and public health far surpasses that of the countless scientists and medical professionals who have dedicated their lives to studying these issues.

Furthermore, your assertion that "almost nobody has raised an eyebrow" is simply false. Governments, health organizations, and individuals around the world have been working tirelessly to contain the spread of the virus and mitigate its impact. Just because you haven't been paying attention doesn't mean that everyone else is as blissfully ignorant as you are.

But the real kicker here is your charming characterization of scientists as "retarded shills." It's always a delight to see someone so confidently dismiss an entire group of highly educated and dedicated professionals based on nothing more than their own ignorance and prejudice. I'm sure that all those scientists who have spent years studying infectious diseases and working to develop treatments and vaccines are just in it for the money and the fame, right? It couldn't possibly be that they genuinely care about public health and are doing their best to protect people like you from a potentially deadly virus.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:17:42 UTC No. 16067937

>>16067925
I appreciate the effort

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:19:03 UTC No. 16067938

>>16067937

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:19:28 UTC No. 16067940

>>16067916
>caused by an entirely different virus
>caused deaths in addition to the typical seasonal flu deaths

JFC, you COVID deniers are as fucking stupid as the Moon Landing deniers, and the Flat Earthers.

The worst part is that you wear being called stupid as a badge of honor. The dumber the shit you can come up with and spout off, the more sure you are that it is true.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:25:20 UTC No. 16067947

>>16067940
there's no virus, you retard. excess deaths were caused by the treatment itself, cutbacks in healthcare, and vaccines.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:27:15 UTC No. 16067948

>>16067947
Don't tell me you haven't taken the vaccihnnngggggggggg? Gobble it up good goy.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 11:28:08 UTC No. 16067950

>>16067947
>source: my feefees, because I'm a mindless contrarian

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 12:23:55 UTC No. 16068000

>>16067811
>Is science really as fake as the news is?
Most Science in the news for sure. Scientifically provable. Most science outside not, nobody except specialists knows it and it's boring outside of the field. So the chances real results is way higher.

>>16067925
>ignorance and arrogance?
Only a shill, bot, believer or "expert" can blinding out the huge contradictions that everyone with the slightest sincerity and seriousness will put in his statement also. Sure this side is named the asshole of the internet 4 a reason, why would you be part of that?

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:20:08 UTC No. 16068193

>>16067950
source for what? that extreme doses of toxic immunosuppressants or bursting lungs from the inside might kill you?

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:27:11 UTC No. 16068203

>>16067811
Absolutely. Yes.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 19:29:42 UTC No. 16068764

>>16067811
The news publishing industry and the science publishing industry are both part of the same media industry, all of which is completely owned by the jews. That jewish ownership explains why all of the media is identically fake and all telling the same lies

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 01:02:47 UTC No. 16069243

>>16067948

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:30:04 UTC No. 16069761

so is this board just another shitty /pol/ colony or what

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:48:33 UTC No. 16069778

>>16069761
Does that surprise you? Everything is politics these days.

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:09:58 UTC No. 16070078

>>16069761
>i hate /sci/
so leave, if you did that you wouldn't have to be so upset and angry all the time

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:25:39 UTC No. 16070108

>>16067925
Didn't read, covid was just influenza with a novel symptom added as a result of human fuckery. Virologists should all be rounded up and shot before they make something stronger.

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:28:43 UTC No. 16070114

>>16067940
>caused deaths in addition to the typical seasonal flu deaths
Wrong, there was no "flu season" in 2019
(there was, cases were simply marked "covid" in addition to novel coronavirus cases in order to boost the apparent number of the infected, as part of a media campaign of spreading unfounded fear during an election year)

AIFag !Gy8L8Ggb7w at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:33:51 UTC No. 16070121

>>16067827
nice try to control the narrative glowie

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:34:49 UTC No. 16070124

>>16067811
Did you live through Covid? Now look into HIV/AIDS. Have fun. It's all an industry.

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:36:28 UTC No. 16070128

>>16067940
Have you stayed up-to-date on your covid boosters? Oh, why not? What are you, some kind of antivaxxer?

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:37:39 UTC No. 16070130

>>16070108
There's no covid virus and there's no influenza virus either. Get your facts straight.

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 14:47:10 UTC No. 16070140

>>16070130
Viruses are real, those viruses are nothingburgers, you are a well-poisoning schizo.

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:44:35 UTC No. 16070209

>>16068764

He’s right. I’m Jewish myself but if you’re a goy and fail to understand this, you are part of the problem.

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:34:15 UTC No. 16070383

>>16067925
Based

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:36:34 UTC No. 16070387

>>16067925
>>16070383
Samefag

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:38:24 UTC No. 16070390

Fags

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:45:13 UTC No. 16070405

>>16070209
You should remind them that when they beat around the bush trying to figure out why they're hated.

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:30:01 UTC No. 16070556

>>16070140
How are viruses real?

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:40:00 UTC No. 16070575

>>16070556
Because they exist.

Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:04:09 UTC No. 16071208

>>16070575
proof?

Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 02:06:22 UTC No. 16071218

>>16071208
They're used in gene therapies.

Anonymous at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 22:42:18 UTC No. 16072999

>>16071208
have faith in >muh soiyence

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 01:24:04 UTC No. 16073227

>>16071208
a legitimate question, demanding public access to electron microscopy

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 02:35:02 UTC No. 16073338

people are easier to control and exploit if they believe all information sources are to be distrusted.
at the same time, as a scientist, one should trust but verify whenever possible.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 02:45:50 UTC No. 16073347

>>16073338
>people are easier to control and exploit if they believe all information sources are to be distrusted.
lolwut? the opposite is true
and the other of your sayings, though less contraversial, is also wrong. Scientists should understand things instead of memorizing them, so he should only trust what doesn't conflict other elements of his model of reality, or until they do.

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 09:37:49 UTC No. 16073806

>>16072999

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 22:08:45 UTC No. 16077914

>>16070130

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 23:16:19 UTC No. 16078069

>>16073347
>>people are easier to control and exploit if they believe all information sources are to be distrusted.
>lolwut? the opposite is true
No. You don't understand. People are not rational creatures, and most have 2-digit IQs. Their models of reality are usually not coherent. Any logic or reasoning you tell them is untrustworthy as everything else. And since they can't trust anything, they defult to trusting whatever is "popular" and whatever their favorite e-celebs say. So when a handfull of entities control the news, social media and can pay celebrities to say anything. The masses' model of reality, is whatever those entities want it to be.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 02:37:03 UTC No. 16078472

>>16078069
>People are not rational creatures
They are.
>and most have 2-digit IQs.
Those are not humans. And to be serious, even if you include the non-humans, only half of us all have 2-digit IQs. So probably you describe your own picture of reality as not coherent, but do not worry, you don't matter anyway (only some black lives matter)

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 03:28:58 UTC No. 16078529

>>16078472
>They are.
Was your seething "troll" post supposed to convince me of that? Demonstrating that your actions are driven by emotion and short-term "rewards" ((You)s) was supposed to convince me that humans act on reason and logic?
>only half of us all have 2-digit IQs
100 is not the median IQ. It is the average IQ, so no, there isn't as many people with 100+ IQ as there are with less than 100.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 07:33:10 UTC No. 16078783

>>16078529
> short-term "rewards"
How is your response a reward, you narcissist? Your responses challenge my views, which benefits me in long-term
>100 is not the median IQ. It is the average IQ, so no, there isn't as many people with 100+ IQ as there are with less than 100.
non seqitur, also you have to explain your joke.
"For modern IQ tests, the raw score is transformed to a normal distribution with mean 100" also consider Flynn effect and that doubt is a sign of intelligence. Now begone, juif.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 08:06:52 UTC No. 16078794

Science is real, but the low-IQ consumer cattle of 4chan don’t know what science means; the definition of “science” held by low-IQ here means something like: “generally circulated and socially-accepted facts and a philosophical outlook built upon them”. The low-IQ definition of “science” can be false or true but is usually false in topics that concern things that are counter-intuitive to the cattle’s social understanding of things.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 08:09:25 UTC No. 16078796

>>16069761
>/pol/ is when people reject the establishment narrative

Who do you think you're fooling?

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 13:55:00 UTC No. 16079104

>>16069761
the moderators refuse to delete /pol/ posts, so it has become an extension of /pol/ users seeking to validate their shit opinions under the guise of science. it sucks. only about 2% of threads are actually fitting the intention of the board's sticky. the rest are mostly thinly veiled /pol/ posts asking "what's the science on [pseud /pol/ topic goes here]?"

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:11:24 UTC No. 16079254

>>16078794
> Science is real
Is it always real?

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:14:50 UTC No. 16079266

>>16079104
>2%
back to creddit, you should return, there you can find the moderators tyranny tranny like you may enjoy.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:51:34 UTC No. 16079335

>>16079266
Exhibit A

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 16:04:26 UTC No. 16079352

>>16079335
we notice, that's what real scientists are good at (not those fake scientists who spend all their days teaching by giving lectures as if their students are illiterate peasants, but the real scientists)

🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 21:27:56 UTC No. 16079995

>>16078794
>i hate 4chan
why are you here?

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 10:07:40 UTC No. 16080913

>>16079104
>/pol/ lives in my head rent free
>/pol/ is all i think about
is /pol/ in the room with us right now?

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:44:42 UTC No. 16081997

>>16079266

Barkon at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:48:12 UTC No. 16082000

>>16081997
Yes.