Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:06:14 UTC No. 16068971

>>16068967
I remember when AI wasn't flooded with software engineers and needed serious mathematical prowess to do research. nowadays it's just code monkeys plugging models into data pipeline and run. most don't even understand basic shit like SVM.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:07:14 UTC No. 16068974

she seems like the kind of person who'd prefer to undersell it and overdeliver rather than be embarrassed for the other way around version.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:11:32 UTC No. 16068984

>>16068967
Making observations is how science is done. Sabine simply observed the reality of ai, one giant circlejerk no thinking inside.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:24:08 UTC No. 16068997

>>16068971
And? Virgins write the maths and code. Chads use dat fo free and make useful shit.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:28:07 UTC No. 16069011

>>16068984
the whole "ai training on ai-generated garbage" soulds like an uninformed cope. do you think ai can't detect ai-generated content? if it can't now, it definitely can in the future.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:31:44 UTC No. 16069021

>>16069011
It's not cope it's the reality. All the data that could have been used to train has been. The players positioned to innovate are companies sitting on proprietary data. The "AI" is not innovating it's regurgitating and adding more compute isn't going to fix that problem. Although. Claude looks really interesting the self-awareness bit is be novel.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:32:26 UTC No. 16069026

>>16069011
>do you think ai can't detect ai-generated content?
if it can we should be able to get a browser addon or something

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:45:12 UTC No. 16069055

>>16069021
>"AI" is not innovating
ai devs aren't trying to do that. what has been the main objective in these recent years are to increase "control" over generation, to replicate exactly what the prompter imagines, not to "innovate".

the worst thing about ai is that humans would be able to control it. instead of democratizing art, humans would just use it to create porn and political images

AIFag !Gy8L8Ggb7w at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:46:23 UTC No. 16069059

>>16068997
that's why we no longer open source our code, model n shit anymore.
you think it's funny but when enough code monkeys take advantage of us we will turn them into free model testers for us.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:52:11 UTC No. 16069068

>>16069059
>we
CSlet cope with god complex.
It's not *you* deciding whether to open source code or not, it's da joooos and corporate interests. You're just a tiny cog in the wheel who will absolutely comply to the managerial decision and do the donkey work.

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 22:57:42 UTC No. 16069078

>>16069055
Bro, just ...
https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 23:11:07 UTC No. 16069107

>>16068967
>What's up with physicists hoping for the fall of AI?
AI bad and dangerous is the most normie take possible right now

>>16068971
>and needed serious mathematical prowess to do research.
the SWEs aren't doing research. are the researchers also now mathlets?

>most don't even understand basic shit like SVM.
tfw read the transformers paper, didn't understand a shred of the math, but could still implement it without knowing why any of the layers exist at all
i want to get a deeper understanding of the math behind all this shit but i also feel like my time is better off focusing on how to get a job

Anonymous at Mon, 11 Mar 2024 23:40:20 UTC No. 16069161

>>16069078
this isn't nearly enough. text2img won't ever be impressive as long as prompters still need to inpaint/edit to get the desired outcome. even with lora/ipadapter sd still messes up eye color

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 01:10:13 UTC No. 16069253

>>16068967
THERE IS NO FREE LUNCH IN PHYSICS!
H
E
R
E

I
S

N
O

F
R
E
E

L
U
N
C
H

I
N

P
H
Y
S
I
C
S
!

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 01:16:34 UTC No. 16069261

>>16069253
plants eat for free from the sun. they literally pay nothing

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:11:52 UTC No. 16069689

>>16068967
frauds afraid their scams will be exposed

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:25:36 UTC No. 16069755

>>16068967
damn, can u see her nipple thru her shirt a little?

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:51:29 UTC No. 16069891

scientists, professors, techies, they're all in full cope/denial mode about AI

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:13:23 UTC No. 16069906

>>16069055
>the worst thing about ai is that humans would be able to control it. instead of democratizing art, humans would just use it to create porn and political images
there is no art in democracy because democracy is a society created by bureaucrats and merchants in order to coom freely

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:35:49 UTC No. 16070191

>>16068967
No one givss a shit. It's not their area of study, therefore their opinion is as valuable as random homeless man's.

Anonymous at Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:50:07 UTC No. 16070219

>>16068971
>I remember when AI wasn't flooded with software engineers and needed serious mathematical prowess to do research. nowadays it's just code monkeys plugging models into data pipeline and run. most don't even understand basic shit like SVM.
This. “Smart” people with “serious mathematical prowess” are mad that the bar to make AI work wonders has been lowered. The idea that AGI will happen purely by making neural networks larger destroys the fantasy that they’ll be the next Newton or Einstein who finds that one weird trick that solves intelligence. That one weird trick is training neural networks with gradient descent and was invented decades ago. The only other thing we needed was for Moore’s law to do its thing for a couple more decades. There’s such a thing as physics envy, but now the physicists have AI envy.