Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 02:46:57 UTC No. 16073349

I assume you put scientists in quotes because they don't look like scientists.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 03:17:00 UTC No. 16073387

>>16073346
How the fuck did that get past review? I'd check the entire paper to see if the whole thing is AI generated.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 03:21:34 UTC No. 16073397

>>16073346
They are chinese, they don't care about quality, never have.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468023024002402

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 03:22:27 UTC No. 16073399

>>16073387
Even in fairly big reputable journals a good portion of the reviewers are literally fucking retarded. Like pajeet sir cite my irrelevant paper sir reformat your caption by vishnu bitch basterd levels of retarded.

By the time it gets to small shit journals I imagine the peer reviewers are either entirely fabricated, mostly the editor's buddies or bottom of the barrel mouthbreathers.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 03:36:19 UTC No. 16073423

>>16073346
you should post this every time after changs say that china has the most scientific publications of every country

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 03:38:20 UTC No. 16073424

>>16073423
>china has the most scientific publications
Keep up grandpa, China also has the most impactful scientific publications now