Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:38:38 UTC No. 16076517

>>16076451
he was a fag and God shot him down. praise to our king above

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:42:29 UTC No. 16076578

his PR is going to work overtime today
imb4
>it was just a test
>we got good data
>every time we fail we learn something so failing is a good thing
>the heat tiles are supposed to all fall off
>the engines didn't fail to re-light we just chose to not re-light them
>release video in a week showing rehearsed s0-y clapping from the control room that will be filmed in the next few days

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:44:53 UTC No. 16076609

>>16076451
After hundreds of billions of government subsidies and 30 years of SpaceX trying to beat it pictured remains the best rocket ever built.
Will Musk ever recover?

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:58:42 UTC No. 16076742

Sometimes I can't tell if people here are being ironic or if they're truly as fucktarded as they seem.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:02:13 UTC No. 16076765

>>16076609
based
the SaturnV was built by God fearing men some of which were veterans in ww2
this generation of engineers are cooked

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:06:51 UTC No. 16076794

>>16076578
>IFT-1 cleared the pad, but failed to stage
>IFT-2 staged, but both stages then failed shortly after
>IFT-3 got to the reentry, but the booster failed the landing burn and the ship got lost after some time during the reentry
Seems like progress to me.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:08:41 UTC No. 16076808

>>16076451
Jews

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:09:12 UTC No. 16076812

>>16076794
Progressed from an imbecile to a retard

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:12:27 UTC No. 16076826

>>16076609
Nothing, and I mean nothing, will ever beat nazi engineering.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:14:14 UTC No. 16076834

>>16076609
Saturn V is expendable rocket which is what Starship currently is while being more powerful. How is Saturn better?

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:16:21 UTC No. 16076843

>>16076826
>Nothing, and I mean nothing, will ever beat nazi engineering.
Anglo and Russian engineering seemed to do that just fine.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:28:09 UTC No. 16076892

>>16076812
>i dont like brute force testing! Its sovlless!

>every crash should stop scientific progress for ten years!

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:28:26 UTC No. 16076895

>>16076794
that is all easy shit
good luck with making the starcuck human rated and in orbit fuel transfer capable

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:29:36 UTC No. 16076902

>>16076451
Sabotaged by jews, is simple as that.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:31:29 UTC No. 16076908

>>16076895
>human rated
That's only needed for NASA astronauts
>orbit fuel transfer capable
They were testing it today.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:32:06 UTC No. 16076909

>>16076451
It was essentially a repeat of ift2. Stage separation then super heavy went boom and a few moments after that starship went boom.

It's ogre.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:33:01 UTC No. 16076916

>>16076517
The bible is fake and gay. Jewish sorcerers aren't real.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:33:13 UTC No. 16076918

>>16076578
They are getting farther each time but probably not at the rate nasa would like

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:34:18 UTC No. 16076928

>>16076918
>nasa would like
Nasa would take decades to develop starship like rocket

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:34:19 UTC No. 16076929

>>16076812
t. 85IQ browncel

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:34:20 UTC No. 16076931

So, it happened AGAIN. We can blame FAA , we can blame NASA, we can praise SpaceX's effort but the truth is it's simply not enough. We need more changes, determination you name it, it all stinks.
Don't get me wrong, I still have full faith in Elon and the lads, but MASSIVE reinforcements are desperately needed in the next launch. Otherwise I'm not very optimistic about starship, or our chances in making it to the moon or mars for that matter. Not launching like this. What do you think?

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:35:00 UTC No. 16076937

How many yes-men are going to lose their jobs?

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:35:15 UTC No. 16076938

>>16076909
>It was essentially a repeat of ift2
Pic related.

>>16076918
>but probably not at the rate nasa would like
It's not like they have a lot of options. And even at the current launch rate, SpaceX is advancing far faster than any other vehicle out there.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:35:52 UTC No. 16076942

>>16076928
How about something like the Saturn v

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:37:35 UTC No. 16076949

>>16076931
Anon, you DO realize that if Starship wasn't made with reuse in mind, this would have been considered a successful launch, right? My bet is that the next IFT will have both parts of the vehicle do a soft splashdown.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:39:35 UTC No. 16076961

>>16076949
it wasnt success tho. the 2nd stage got fucked.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:41:09 UTC No. 16076970

>>16076961
Imagine this but with 200 colonists roasting on board, someone needs to stop Elon

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:41:52 UTC No. 16076975

It burned up because the shielding was on one side, it's a massive ship, and the thrust vectoring wasn't capable of keeping it rolled over and aligned with the atmosphere as it came in at 25,000 kph. If anything, they're going to have to look at making more powerful thrusters.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:43:20 UTC No. 16076981

>>16076929
Your entire country is brown

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:44:40 UTC No. 16076990

>>16076742
They're real, anon.
They are that dumb.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:52:48 UTC No. 16077025

>>16076931
I think you shut your fat mouth.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:57:49 UTC No. 16077046

Thunderf00t did a pretty good job explaining it on his live stream said it should be up for patreons as well as yt at the same due to how bad this launch was.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:00:55 UTC No. 16077053

>>16076942
Saturn V has SOVL musk has nothing

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:02:59 UTC No. 16077062

>>16077046
>I-It was always possible there just isn't any market demand
Thundertroon on damage control

AIFag !Gy8L8Ggb7w at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:03:02 UTC No. 16077063

>>16076949
without resuablity, why would government and NASA fund Muskrat space endeavour? NASA did "the thing" decades ago. Muskrat has NASA engineers with all the knowledge and NASA money, his job is to deliver what was promised, otherwise what is the point of sspaceX?

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:05:48 UTC No. 16077069

>>16077063
You seem to have missed the point of my post.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:58:32 UTC No. 16077335

>>16076609
Based Nazis, we fought on the wrong side of WW2.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:00:32 UTC No. 16077342

>>16076834
Saturn V completed it's missions and carried humans into space. Starship is an exploding soda can that does nothing but explode. It's a $1 billion firework.

>In 1969, Apollo 11 was the first mission to land astronauts on the moon. Saturn V rockets also made it possible for astronauts to land on the moon on Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:08:27 UTC No. 16077360

>>16077342
Apollo 1 barbecued its inhabitants on the pad.
Fuck off

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:29:00 UTC No. 16077420

>>16077360

That was the capsule though not the booster. The Saturn V will always be the most powerful looking rocket since its shape looks like a high powered rifle cartridge while the starship looks like a flying dildo.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:46:21 UTC No. 16077449

>>16076451
>TSLA sliding bad despite record year for the rest of the S&P500
>SpaceX ship destroyed on reentry
>TwitteX user numbers at all-time low
Elonsisters, is this our year to kick chairs?

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:51:32 UTC No. 16077462

>>16076578
i just want to see the booster hitting the ocean at twice the speed of sound

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:53:23 UTC No. 16077469

>>16076578
are you retarded?

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:54:26 UTC No. 16077473

>>16076931
literally what are you talking about

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:00:24 UTC No. 16077490

>>16076942
A decade and counting to develop a poor man's Shuttle-Saturn V Frankenstein

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:31:52 UTC No. 16077698

>>16076908
>orbit fuel transfer capable
>They were testing it today
I'm cheering for SpaceX, but come on. I don't think even you consider it a real orbital fuel transfer test.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:46:06 UTC No. 16077723

>>16077420
>muh looks
Real life is not science fiction. It doesn't matter one bit what the rocket looks like, pseud faggot.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:46:39 UTC No. 16077724

>>16076975
Anon, I don't think the control thrusters were working at all during reentry.