Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:51:49 UTC No. 16077208

>>16077200
I don't have any thoughts on thunderf00t, but
>satellites cost more to make than they cost to launch
Doesn't [math] \emph{seem} [/math] right. Can anyone either back that up or disprove it?

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:53:29 UTC No. 16077216

>>16077200
That fucking faggot is the literal definition of "Piled Higher and Deeper"

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:16:20 UTC No. 16077259

>>16077200
If that was true they wouldn't have a near monopoly on the launch market with falcon 9, exclusive starlink launches

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:16:51 UTC No. 16077261

>>16077200
That is the sounds of the goal posts moving. Our boy thundercock succumbed to the spike.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:17:21 UTC No. 16077262

>>16077259
>Exclusive
Excluding*

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:30:40 UTC No. 16077275

>>16077200
>Making shipping from the far east cheap and frequent doesn't make sense, the only things you want to import from the orient are expensive things, like spices and silk. It doesn't really change much.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:45:32 UTC No. 16077302

my god why such physically reulsive and disfigured subhumans are allowed to live and disturb other ppl with their visage

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:52:49 UTC No. 16077318

>>16077200
I don't think Starship will ever work, however if it did in some perfect non-clown world then it would indeed revolutionize the space industry. ThunderFagg0t ignores the large cargo hold of Starship. This would allow for space telescopes to be launched that mog JWST like the limp dicked loser it is. The real issue isn't the reusability part but the size. With increased diameter of cargo hold we can do tons of shit in space we couldn't before.

But here we are, no working Starship and way behind schedule. There will never be the launch tempo Musk promised and the Starship is a horrible design that keeps getting messed with and made more complicated. They keep failing in the most basic ways possible and making themselves look like asshats.

ThunderKike is like a shit stained broken clock, right twice a day but only by coincidence. Nearly every other word out of his mouth is pop sci shart. But it just goes to show that a reddit tier faggot still can see through Musk's bullshit like a laser beam. What's you excuse /sci/ ?

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:58:51 UTC No. 16077337

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:59:46 UTC No. 16077339

>>16077200
How is ThunderTHAD so based?

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:06:39 UTC No. 16077354

>its never going to be built. fraud
built
>its going to explode on the pad. scam
clears the pad
>fine, but hot staging will never work. slava ukraini
hot staging works perfectly
(we are here)
>ok it's in space, but the tiles will never work
>yea the tiles work, but booster and starship will never be reusable.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:49:02 UTC No. 16077456

>>16077200
Thunderfoot is an NPC brainlet.
AND
SpaceX RocketPlane is a terrible vehicle.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:51:49 UTC No. 16077466

>>16077354
>but booster and starship will never be reusable.
We're past all of that now. We're on
>Yeah but there isn't really market for this.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:01:40 UTC No. 16077493

>>16077354
>>16077466
Competing half a jigsaw puzzle isn't an accomplishment. Starship is still a failed project. You can't count failure as success and not expect to be called out on it.

Not to mention you are making a lot of assumptions about what did and what didn't work. Lots of damage to Starship on this third launch and we will see the full after action report soon. It looked like a shit ton of fuel was leaking, the doors fucked up, and I'm pretty sure there was a huge hole in the hull of Starship. The whole system is so unstable you really have no idea what will or won't break each time it launches. Sooner or later it'll just explode on the pad because the Space Xtards are playing so fast and so loose.

You idiots only like dunking on ThunderTrans because he's a midwit homosexual and makes it easy. If/when you are forced to debate someone with above room temp IQ you always switch to ad hominem attacks and/or accuse me of working for Bezos or Boeing.

Like I always say, prove me wrong and call me a faggot by flying humans to Mars in one piece. I'd love to see it. But it's not happened and it won't ever happen. That's the issue.

>>16077456
he gets it

>>16077466
Bust Starship isn't reusable, it's literally disposable under the current results, so we aren't past that now are we?

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:02:51 UTC No. 16077498

>>16077275
>and nobody would ever want to pay for silk in bulk. i know this because nobody's ever tried to purchase something which has never been available on the market before.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:05:23 UTC No. 16077504

Have you seen my new tits?
You may reconsider the choice you pretend to have made, once you see them.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:15:02 UTC No. 16077523

This dork is stunningly spiteful and pathetic. It's very difficult for me to imagine someone's mindset which is so obsessively fueled by resentment.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:20:35 UTC No. 16077534

>>16077318
Lmao, you pseudo intellectual retards are so entertaining to see in action. You're no different from thundercuck.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:20:39 UTC No. 16077535

>>16077354
>hot staging works perfectly

>'reusable rocket' crashes violently into ocean and has never been successfully landed

ok

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:24:38 UTC No. 16077543

>>16077493
Reddit spacing

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:04:23 UTC No. 16077630

>>16077493
Their engineering philosophy is to test prototype vehicles, learn from what went wrong and then improve, to call it a 'failed project' when it's doing exactly as expected is a distorted take

You mention lots of small and easily fixable issues, e.g. the door - nothing too concerning there. "I bet it will just explode" is also a non-point. You will eventually be proven wrong when it flies to Mars, but until that point continue to be gratified that an in-progress engineering project is not yet finished

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:11:05 UTC No. 16077647

>>16077200
Not giving him a click and you shouldn't either. He's made over $800,000 from YouTube because he says outrageous things and like felines to catnip, people watch the videos to stoke their own personal outrage addiction.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:11:50 UTC No. 16077650

>>16077523
What is he, in his late 40s? Childless and single. It follows.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:12:03 UTC No. 16077651

>>16077318
I almost choked on my biscuits laughing. Nice post anon

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 23:22:00 UTC No. 16078087

>>16077651
why did you laugh, anon?

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 23:24:27 UTC No. 16078093

>>16077275
about to give the same analogy myself as i suspect this is the answer to the issue

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 23:25:28 UTC No. 16078094

>>16077493 (you)

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Mar 2024 23:42:20 UTC No. 16078159

>>16077318
>ThunderFagg0t ignores the large cargo hold of Starship.
Best to ignore any talk of "cargo" when the fucking thing can't even complete a partial orbit in one piece.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 12:15:49 UTC No. 16079008

>>16078159
yet

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:15:31 UTC No. 16079267

>>16077493
>it didn't work so it'll never work

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:21:53 UTC No. 16079285

>>16077200
>That was always the thing, making things rapidly reusable, that was never a large launch market, this… this…
There was never a market for new products. The market is created with the product. For instance there was no market for cars before cars were invented, you get what im saying?

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:25:11 UTC No. 16079288

>>16079285
wagons trains boats

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:47:48 UTC No. 16079328

>>16077200
This guy has to be smart enough to understand what iterative design is. It will be interesting to see how he shifts goal posts if Staship/hls is able to land on the surface of the moon - maybe saying that there’s no way it can reach Mars?

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 16:02:32 UTC No. 16079349

>>16079328
>It will be interesting to see how he shifts goal posts if Staship/hls is able to land on the surface of the moon
he constantly compares Starship to Saturn V, so he will just say something like "Saturn V already did that decades ago"

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:12:12 UTC No. 16079674

Males that use fingernail polish are automatically failed males.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:15:26 UTC No. 16079685

>discussion about technology
>>>/g/

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 22:52:28 UTC No. 16080135

>>16079008
>>16079267
Reminder that picrel is the goal...the capability to accomplish over a dozen launches in rapid succession with a nonexistent refueling system with nonexistent "tankers" to an as yet nonexistent HLS. By 2026. This is what Musk's pet NASA administrator committed him to when she hijacked the HLS contract in 2020 before she jumped ship for SpaceX.

>>16079685
Sorry to take you away from flat earth, climate change, anti-vaxxer and IQ cope threads.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 23:18:18 UTC No. 16080169

>>16077200
>satellites cost more to make than they cost to launch, so even if you going to make launching they cheaper, it doesn’t really change much
Satellites are expensive because when launching is expensive, it's worth spending a lot of money to make them reliable, small, light, long-lasting, and bespoke. If launching is cheap, satellites can be heavier, less reliable, less durable, and mass-manufactured, and therefore more cheaper to produce.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 23:20:30 UTC No. 16080173

>>16080169
he's high on his own farts. and people watching the trainwreck is what's actually fucking him up even more. once on this train it's pretty hard to get off

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Mar 2024 23:58:48 UTC No. 16080242

>>16080135
>unironically posting a Blue Origin propaganda infographic
lmao

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 01:46:42 UTC No. 16080379

>>16080242
Propaganda or not, it's accurate.

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 01:52:37 UTC No. 16080388

>>16077200
>the satellites cost more to make than they cost to launch
kek

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:54:09 UTC No. 16080526

>>16080388
he's right though

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 06:51:49 UTC No. 16080700

>>16077200
I'm not sure how successful starship will be, but this Youtuber has pointed out that Thunderf00t lies about SpaceX.

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 06:52:54 UTC No. 16080701

>>16080700
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-ny_Ba4K_w

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 15:55:01 UTC No. 16081365

Starshit is useless in the sense that we're never leaving the sol system with these primitive combustion-based ships

We need implosion-based tech (vortex/ether/zero point field dynamics being utilized directly)

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 16:52:25 UTC No. 16081465

>>16081365
who cares about leaving the solar system? there's tons of shit to explore here, it will take a couple hundreds of years to explore our solar system.

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:00:51 UTC No. 16081916

The axis powers actively researched anti-gravity propulsion tech

The haunebus ("foo fighters" as the allies called them) were supposedly able to enter the stratosphere within under a minute

The allies never managed to properly reproduce them, but the introduction of this tech caught the attention of certain non-human sapient visitors for sure

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:03:58 UTC No. 16081924

>en.metapedia.org/wiki/The_Bell

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:07:52 UTC No. 16081930

>>16080526
he's wrong in the sense that he implies lowering the cost to launch is irrelevant. when the satellites are expensive exactly because it's expensive to launch them.
so, if lowering the cost to launch lowers the production cost of the satellites he's wrong yeah.
this type of being right is the most retarded type of being right, out of all the ways you can be right, this particular one is gorilla retarded

Barkon at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:09:24 UTC No. 16081934

>>16081930
Ban this faggot jannies.

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:18:38 UTC No. 16081943

>>16081934
you're the same type of bitch that thundercunt is

Barkon at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:19:49 UTC No. 16081945

>>16081943

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:26:27 UTC No. 16081956

>>16077200
Now this is mental gymnastics. He just has a hate boner for anything to do with Elon. Elon could cure cancer and he'd still find a way to hate him.

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:39:13 UTC No. 16081986

>>16081945
>thunderfag will eventually be right, just you wait now. two more weeks

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 23:06:47 UTC No. 16082109

>>16081956
> "cancer is still very rare when compared to other real issues like poverty"
> "imagine spending billions of dollars to cure cancer instead of solving poverty"
> "He's just stealing the work of other real scientists that were already working on that"

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 09:35:14 UTC No. 16082768

>>16080701
[spoiler]Troon flag...[/spoiler]
https://youtu.be/v-ny_Ba4K_w?feature=shared&t=134
Argument disregarded.

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 10:01:47 UTC No. 16082810

>>16082768
Okay, she supports a common-sense movement. So?

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 10:25:23 UTC No. 16082833

>>16081930
You are obviously correct on your point here, but I don't even think you need to go to this level. Being able to launch satellites for less money, even if the satellite costs the same, will still open up possibilities for companies with a budget. It's an insane point he's making really, if companies can save money then of course it's good for them even if the sat is the most expensive part. Then you have all the additional stuff like the wide diameter, and the rideshare programs on Starship will get the price way down

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 10:43:16 UTC No. 16082846

>>16077200
>Starship
Looks ugly as fuck.

>Starship
Exploding shit cheep rockets form retard twitter meme man.

>Thunderf00t
He literally has schizophrenia.

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 10:46:02 UTC No. 16082847

I actually liked his pre-musk videos. he morphed into something weird

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 16:06:25 UTC No. 16083149

>>16082846
>He literally has schizophrenia.
sauce?

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 05:42:10 UTC No. 16084248

>>16082846
>>16083149
I was wondering why you believe he has schizophrenia as well.

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 05:45:59 UTC No. 16084250

>>16077208
>Doesn't \emphseem
>\emph{seem} right.
wat

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 05:50:28 UTC No. 16084253

>>16084250
What don't you [math]understand[/math]?

🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 05:53:56 UTC No. 16084258

[math]onions[/math]

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 06:34:07 UTC No. 16084323

>>16081930
Satellites are expensive since before they were one offs. When you build a 100 of the same kind all those fixed costs get spread out.

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:22:08 UTC No. 16084657

>>16083149
>sauce?
Did you ever listen to thunderfag?
He literally rambles incoherently and thinks his incoherent ramblings are proof of something.

He was always like this.
One of his fetishes is the speed of sound here he get very excited when something is at or above the speed of sound like being x5 the speed of sound.

The best example of this is why thungerfag opposed Brexit.
Watch that video, he literally did think if Britain leaves the EU europe will enter another world war or some incoherent crap like that.
Or how he literally must travel internationally for this SSCCCIIIEEENNCCEEEE and magically having a small bag with a passport is something that his schizo brain can not imagine as a possibility.

The dude obviously has mild schizophrenia. Another example is how for no fucken reason he uses like 5 different colors in his videos obvious bright.

I mean jesus fuck! Most people will use 2 or 3 colors max.

Or how he schizoed out about ice or some dude getting excited over a water bottle. Can anyone explain to me WTF was that all about?

I'm not buying the water bottle and the guy shilling it did not really explain what it does.
Thunderfoot did go into his epic le debunking modes and did a experiment where he threw ice into hot water and measured the temperature changes.

WTF was he trying to prove here? Can anyone explain? I think the trick was that the shilled bottle has like 2 layers and holds water inside that you freeze this way you cool your drink without mixing in the molten ice or something.

WTF was thunderfoot all about there? You see schizos in religion and science thrive since lot of people mistake not understanding a schizo for deep wisdom or intelligence while in reality it is literally nonsense or a viewpoint so corrupted by schizophrenia that only the outcome can be correct while the schizo reasoning is invalid.

Obviously he spots things like solar roadways, however the dude clearly has some schizophrenia going on there.

1/3

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:23:24 UTC No. 16084658

>>16084657
>>16083149

2/3
Take a look at this picture.
Was there even a FUCKEN reason for the fagot to make the point #2 another fucken color?

Combined with his incoherent speech and arguments I conclude that thunderfoot has schizophrenia. I think the biggest self debunk he made of himself is when he made a bet that Elon will be bankrupt in 5 years
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYURUiOjZSw

So if Elon is not bankrupt in 2030 you can assume that the fucken schizo is literally wrong and he can not talk his way out of this hole.
Because the rest of his crap is so schizo that you can not understand what he is even saying at this point other then
><INSERT NAME HERE> bad

Thunderfoot is also very clueless. He literally is only a chemist yet he digs into economics and threat's it like some expert. Despite the fact that economics is bullshit and people with economic degrees know this.

Here is one area where 300% I know he is wrong and his talking points are very stupid. You can most of the time not use money like this and thunder schizo literally uses money like it is a fundamental force of the universe or some shit!

Because what he did read some economics bullshit online? Or what? I have a degree in economics for fucks sake.

Let that schizo try to bullshit how him being only a chemist makes him magically an expert on economics who can outclass people with actual degrees in this subject?

>Elon wealth destruction
No this is not how you read this and not how you use this.
There are numerous factors involved in going bankrupt all who are social and complicated. Money or le wealth is not a fundamental force of the universe that you can plug into a equation like when a train going 60 km/h will arrive at in 20 years.


2/3

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:24:30 UTC No. 16084659

>>16084657
>>16084658
>>16083149

3/3
The guy also tried to explain why him only being a chemist is not a problem for him talking about other subjects. And he hits on economics the most
>This will fail
I can literally assure you that like with Amazon if investors keep on throwing money at it and if there is a social push (government) for this you can keep making money by only producing cars with square wheel cars and you make money for the rest of your life.
Thunderfoot is incompetent and has no idea what he is talking about here.

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:59:43 UTC No. 16084681

>>16077200
Gee, I switched the thunderfoot channel and saw a vid about Hyperloop going bust. I generally scan the news a few times a week and never saw a mention of that, despite all the endless hype ( lol ) when it was still a work in progress.

I dont generally watch thunderfoot much because he prattles on too much, but he seems to have a real hate boner for Musk. Why is that?

Barkon at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 12:01:22 UTC No. 16084682

>>16084681
I have a love nut for what you just said.

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 20:12:20 UTC No. 16085287

>>16084658
If your so smart y arent u rich, anon

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 20:36:45 UTC No. 16085346

Unrelated but
>80 years of rocket science
>Increasingly intricate fuels, materials, engines.
>Maximum autism in the Space Shuttle era with internal liquid hydrogen transfer, 5 seals in each of the $50mil engines
>One missing tile causes loss of vehicle + crew because aluminum and it needs to look like an airplane for no reason.
>Musk has some water tank welders weld metal rings together, fills them with natural gas, straps 33 engines to the tank
>Spaceflight revolutionized

How is it possible? Was spaceflight just 100% fake and an unemployment program for engineers ever since the moon landing?

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:19:58 UTC No. 16086074

>>16082847
>his pre-musk videos.
You mean when he was beating the dead horse of solar roadways for like six fucking years?

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:37:52 UTC No. 16086080

>>16086074
yeah had a look at his videos and somewhere 5-6 years ago fully stopped watching him.
also holy shit, dude's been uploading on youtube for 17 years that's crazy