Image not available

181x279

tLNqXJmSCRgxxFkSr....jpg

๐Ÿงต Math book recommendation request

Anonymous No. 16081822

Hello /sci/, math undergraduate student here. I was looking into multivariable integration since I have it next semester and all resources I found are very strange. Baby Rudin's ch 10 11 do it very weirdly and very short/terse manner, and I did not like Spivak Calculus on Manifolds either.
I tried reading Munkres Analysis on Manifolds and even he has that portion not as well as he dealt with the multivariable differentiation

Any good suggestions for this topic? Anything is appreciated. I enjoyed Munkres Analysis on Manifolds treatment of differentiation a lot.

Any suggestions?
I need an easy book that lays down all the theory needed in detailed comprehensive manner which i can easily access, maybe some manifold intuition too

Later of course I will solve Rudin and Spivak problems but I need a book to learn

Anonymous No. 16081853

>>16081822
Zorich Vol 2 covers it, I've haven't read that yet, but Vol 1 is my favorite analysis book.

Anonymous No. 16082196

https://www.math.stonybrook.edu/~aknapp/download/stokes-coverandinside.pdf

Anonymous No. 16082249

>>16081822
There really aren't great books at that level on the subject, since you need considerably more background on the subject to understand the motivation behind most of the concepts involved. Volume 1 of Spivak's "A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry" is probably the best book accessible at your level; it's much more readable than his calculus on manifolds book. Bishop and Goldberg's "tensor analysis on manifolds" is shorter and also explains things pretty well.
To get the full picture involving the deRham cohomology there's Bott and Tu's "differential forms in algebraic topology" but it definitely requires that you already know a lot of algebraic topology to make sense of it, so you have a long way to go before then.

Anonymous No. 16082663

>>16082249
How to get into cohomology then?

Anonymous No. 16082677

Are there good series for physicists, engineers or applied mathematicians? Something like "Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics", but more organized for progressive learning? I take the first volume, read it, then I take the second volume, read it, etc.

Anonymous No. 16082680

>>16081822
Bogachev

Anonymous No. 16083327

>>16082680
Which book

Anonymous No. 16083338

Read Springer

Anonymous No. 16083339

>>16081822
you sure do seem to like talking about yourself on social media

Anonymous No. 16083370

>>16083338
WHICH SPRINGER BOOK

Anonymous No. 16085092

>>16081822
Spivak's Calculus on Manifolds is great. Wtf is your problem with it?

Pax No. 16086245

>>16083327
Measure theory

Anonymous No. 16086524

>>16085092
Fucking imbecile. It contains many errors including some serious ones in proofs, and it's hand wavy in many places.

Anonymous No. 16086595

>>16083339
kek

Anonymous No. 16086599

>>16081822
hubbard and hubbard
you don't need more

Anonymous No. 16086848

>>16085092
It is the most retarded and most hideous piece of mathematical textbook I have ever seen the fact that this and rudin's chapter 10 and 11 exist and are celebrated as good mathematical texts is a crime in name of mathematics

Anonymous No. 16086850

>>16082663
Just read Hatcher. If that's a problem read a real algebraic topology book like Spanier.

Anonymous No. 16086884

>>16086524
>It contains many errors including some serious ones in proofs, and it's hand wavy in many places
Examples?
> It is the most retarded and most hideous piece of mathematical textbook I
It's very good. I learned a lot from it.

Anonymous No. 16086890

>>16081822
Vector calculus, linear algebra, and differential forms - a unified approach - hubbard

Anonymous No. 16086892

>>16086599
>and a good moring to you, sir

Anonymous No. 16087007

>>16081822
Multivariable analysis from Vector to Manifold - Mikusinski