Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 22:14:51 UTC No. 16082029

and your strings are made out of balls

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 22:21:54 UTC No. 16082035

>>16082029
But how?double balls are also made out of strings

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 22:45:00 UTC No. 16082067

>>16082025
My foreskin is made of strings. I call it a forestring

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 23:27:33 UTC No. 16082138

>>16082025
Aliens are made out of strings

࿗ क्रांतिकारी मित्र ࿗ at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 01:29:36 UTC No. 16082295

>>16082025
>Your balls are made out of strings
topkek.

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 06:23:36 UTC No. 16082602

This explains why I shoot ropes

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:19:06 UTC No. 16082951

>>16082025
why all the new scientific theories sound like something a cartoon writer would have write?

Monadas !lyWkAM5ERA at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 15:53:56 UTC No. 16083136

>>16082025
Mine are made out of the platonic solids.

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 17:01:25 UTC No. 16083197

>>16082025
If we already know what fundamental particles are meant to be, based on the universal symmetries of spacetime, how is it that they get to be described as strings?
For instance something like an electron is supposed to not have any more internal structure. It should not have "vibration modes" or size.
Does all that come from the extra dimensions?

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 17:48:12 UTC No. 16083253

>>16082025
Based Cocku

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:06:46 UTC No. 16083449

>>16082025
Strings are stored in the balls

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:11:47 UTC No. 16083466

i remember this guy humiliated himself in front of the entire world with his quantum computer book, even joe 'caveman' rogan was able to spot his bullshit

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:18:14 UTC No. 16083487

>>16083466
What? How so?

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 20:55:03 UTC No. 16085389

He appears on Ancient Aliens. Do you think he is for real? He made me believe in 12 dimensional hyperspace.

🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 21:22:19 UTC No. 16085418

>>16083197
String theory does not describe the electron as a vibrating string. Anyone that tells you otherwise does not understand string theory, or at best is being deceitful because it is easier to explain things that way, and they know no one will be able to correct them (but it's probably the former).

String theory does indeed describe zero mass particles like gravitons (as well as lots of other exotic things you've never heard of) as the lowest energy states of vibrating strings. The states of the vibrating string with higher energy have masses on the order of the Planck mass, and they have nothing to do with the electron. The standard model fields including the electron are supposed to come about through some convoluted Kaluza-Klein compactification scheme involving the zero mass string states.

The electron is not supposed to be a vibrating string

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 21:23:22 UTC No. 16085419

>>16083197
String theory does not describe the electron as a vibrating string. Anyone that tells you otherwise does not understand string theory, or at best is being deceitful because it is easier to explain things that way, and they know no one will be able to correct them (but it's probably the former).

String theory does indeed describe zero mass particles like gravitons (as well as lots of other exotic things you've never heard of) as the lowest energy states of vibrating strings. The states of the vibrating string with higher energy have masses on the order of the Planck mass, and they have nothing to do with the electron. The standard model fields including the electron are supposed to come about through some convoluted Kaluza-Klein compactification scheme involving the zero mass string states.

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 21:35:00 UTC No. 16085448

>>16085389
He lied to you

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:18:34 UTC No. 16085536

>>16082025
So I guess string theory turning out to be bullshit was the reason he went full schizo.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 12:24:47 UTC No. 16086402

>>16082602
Rope theory

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:56:58 UTC No. 16086796

>>16085419
sum it up, do electrons in string theory have additional structure, i.e new quantum numbers or a greater range of values for them, besides what is known from conventional QED?

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:34:01 UTC No. 16086853

>>16082025
Hello. They are made out of strings, but produce ropes. Amazing, yes.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:04:38 UTC No. 16086882

>>16086796
No. There is only a very indirect connection between strings and electrons, even within string theory itself.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:13:47 UTC No. 16086895

>>16086882
so is it all just gravitons?
What about photons?
Also, what makes the gravitons in string theory actually be related to gravity?

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:25:22 UTC No. 16086916

>>16086895
>so is it all just gravitons?
Sort of. There are other things like "dilatons" and various antisymmetric tensor fields, and all of these things have supersymmetric partners if we are talking about superstring theory. All of this mess of lowest energy string states can really just be related to waves in a "supergravity" theory, which is a field theory which is like a supersymmetric generalization of general relativity in 10d, with matter fields related to all those strange things like dilatons and so on.

>What about photons?
There is a way to produce things like photons or gauge bosons directly from open string theories where strings have end points, but not in closed string theories where strings only form loops. The original version of string phenomenology in the mid 80s involved a form of closed string theory, so the gauge bosons in the standard model aren't derived directly from strings at least in this framework.