🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 14:23:42 UTC No. 16083060
What if extremely massive black holes outside our observable universe are driving the expansion we see?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 14:25:26 UTC No. 16083061
>>16083060
As far as we know the universe is expanding uniformly, the idea that these black holes must be vast majority of the mass of the universe but conveniently can't be seen anywhere is very unlikely
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 15:21:06 UTC No. 16083103
>>16083060
and i though that i was the only one annoying that scientists just collectively decide to ignore the rest of the universe outside of our observable universe
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 15:32:43 UTC No. 16083113
>>16083060
I guess it could be possible. Black holes don't really suck things in until something becomes really close to it though, things can orbit a black hole for ages, and gravity potential falloff is fairly small compared to the size of the universe. Meaning it would likely just stretch the edges of the universe leaving the rest as it is instead of stretch it all at once. This is kinda related, once something comes within range of gravitational tidal forces it only really affects the part that's closer to the higher gravity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roche
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 15:57:44 UTC No. 16083141
>>16083061
That’s kinda hard to measure no? I’m pretty sure the only evidence for accelerated expansion is some supernova looking more red than predicted
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 19:09:25 UTC No. 16083341
what is it about black holes that makes them the number one most popular popsci topic of discussion amongst the brainlet soience fangoys?
is it the comic bookish aspects of the spectacular, unrealistic and completely non disprovable conjectures which go along with the topic that make black holes so popular amongst the scientist posers and wannabes?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:13:08 UTC No. 16083471
>>16083341
Less post makey more meds takey
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:15:21 UTC No. 16083481
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:17:13 UTC No. 16083484
>>16083481
kek
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:19:27 UTC No. 16083489
is possible that mass creates space? like if overall density is one atom per cubic meter then each atom generates 1 cubic meter of space?
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:23:09 UTC No. 16083495
>>16083341
Get the last covid booster and fucking die or something.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:24:31 UTC No. 16083498
>>16083060
There is already a far better model that explains both expansion and inflation. There is no need for that shitty hack.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:29:54 UTC No. 16083503
>>16083498
Let me guess, the model is that Christ is king?
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:36:00 UTC No. 16083519
what is it about black holes that makes them the number one most popular popsci topic of discussion amongst the brainlet soience fangoys?
is it the comic bookish aspects of the spectacular, unrealistic and completely non disprovable conjectures which go along with the topic that make black holes so popular amongst the scientist posers and wannabes?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:34:44 UTC No. 16084956
>>16083341
Did you really report that person. You're a gigantic loser