🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:19:14 UTC No. 16085537
Do women belong in science?
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:24:51 UTC No. 16085544
>>16085537
Sure, why not. Women are perfectly fine. Feminists are not. Both male and female. Actually, male feminists are probably even more insufferable than the female ones.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:27:37 UTC No. 16085551
>>16085544
Relax Thunderf00t.
The fact you can't get laid has nothing to do with feminism.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 23:12:58 UTC No. 16085655
>>16085537
There is a very specific type of woman that belongs to science. Most women are not of that type.
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Mar 2024 23:45:11 UTC No. 16085700
>>16085537
Women in science can apply for funding through the normal channels AND through NGOs like the National Women's Council. This gives them twice as much opportunity for funding than men, making it an unfair playing field (or if it isn't unfair, then we are basically admitting that women can't compete without special treatment). I think women should be allowed in science (or simply that they should not be disallowed just because they are women), but the special treatment should be removed, or the fact that they aren't able to compete should be admitted publically and women should become wards of the state and go back into the kitchen, where the majority ultimately belong.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:01:14 UTC No. 16085718
>>16085537
Women belong on science.
(Science is what I named my penis.)
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:05:24 UTC No. 16085726
>>16085718
not big on science eh?
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:32:11 UTC No. 16085762
>>16085537
No. Intelligent people do. If they can ask questions, run experiments, not lie, and solve problems then they should be in science. Be it men, women, trannies, faggots, OP. It just so happens 97% will be men, 1.9% will be women, .1% will be trannies.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:50:51 UTC No. 16085782
>>16085537
As long as they give me the sex they owe me, they can do science.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 01:11:00 UTC No. 16085805
Women may optionally entertain careers after the age of 45. After bearing 3 children at a minimum and raising them to adulthood she may do with her life as she chooses.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:36:25 UTC No. 16086855
>>16085544
the fpbp trend continues
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:58:33 UTC No. 16086966
>>16085537
I'd let women this hot in, sure.
The halo effect alone is worth like 35 IQ points.
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 04:20:12 UTC No. 16087576
>>16085544
>Sure, w
Opinion discarded.
>>16085549
>There are some good
Opinion discarded.
>>16085655
>There is a very specific type of woman that belongs
Opinion discarded.
>>16085700
>I think women should be allowed in science
Opinion discarded.
>>16085718
>Women belong
Opinion discarded.
>>16085762
>Be it men, women, trannies, faggots,
Opinion discarded.
>>16085782
>As long as
Opinion discarded.
>>16085805
>Women may
Opinion discarded.
>>16086966
>I'd let women
Opinion discarded.
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:31:34 UTC No. 16087928
>>16087576
>t. incel
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:45:23 UTC No. 16088018
>>16087928
>Implying that's a bad thing
Women are trash, I wish I was a homosexual.
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:49:35 UTC No. 16088022
>>16085537
Yes.
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 13:36:29 UTC No. 16088064
>>16085537
A woman's place is in the kitchen.
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:30:36 UTC No. 16088115
>>16085537
Sure, but only if they're hot. Hot babe scientists is my fetish.
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:32:58 UTC No. 16088119
as long as they aren't professors
if a woman has to teach something it's actually better to have her teach science and math (undergraduate or lower) than the humanities
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:00:12 UTC No. 16088153
More Dianne Fosseys, fewer Jane Goodalls
Anonymous at Thu, 21 Mar 2024 14:25:25 UTC No. 16089457
>>16085544
trvth nvke
Anonymous at Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:10:25 UTC No. 16089990
>>16085551
please does someone have this troon leftist wojack parody image of thunderf00t?
Anonymous at Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:12:21 UTC No. 16089994
>>16089990
the one where he shows the middle finger
Anonymous at Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:26:15 UTC No. 16090025
>>16090020
immagine his face when he wakes to a phonecall from some russian doctors explaining him that his entire familly fell out of a window
Anonymous at Thu, 21 Mar 2024 22:54:19 UTC No. 16090212
No. They should stop taking spots from men and raise new scientists instead.
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Mar 2024 12:12:44 UTC No. 16090932
>>16087576
>Sounds like the average crystal healing astrology toting misandrist
>Womem bab
Lmao
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Mar 2024 12:23:37 UTC No. 16090940
>>16087576
Based beyond belief.
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Mar 2024 12:38:29 UTC No. 16090953
>>16090940
>Samefag jerks own ego
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Mar 2024 12:56:55 UTC No. 16090972
>>16087576
Based, behead all women
>>16090953
Butthurt child angry that people disagree with him on shit that doesn't matter
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:16:32 UTC No. 16091001
>>16085537
I dont hate or dislike women.
Women in the workplace however (including science) has been extremely deliterious.
It's ok, the west will go Korea mode or there'll be some sort of male uprising. It will have to be against the govt because the govt (poweful males) arent harmed by womrn getting ahead. Indeed, women are good obedient workers who dont cause disruption in the same way motivated men do. They dont ask for wage rises, theyrr financially illiterate, and so on.
None of that I really blame them for. They're just different. But *much* easier to rule over than a powerful male workforce. If men have no resources save for the elites, they cannot possibly upset the status quo. Women have too much self preservation to ever violently protest a controlling authoritarian state.
You must see the "women in STEM" as creating a moat around the powerful from disgruntled men.
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:19:24 UTC No. 16091005
>>16090972
>Samefag returns, still insecure about women being more valuable to society than he ever has been
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:21:09 UTC No. 16091009
>>16085537
some of them, sure. I've been involved in science in academia and private industry. women are just as good at men at number crunching and paper writing.
although i think in general men are slightly better at experimental design. although i don't have good data to back that up.
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:29:16 UTC No. 16091020
>>16090972
>Butthurt retard angry that he will die a virgin can't do anything to contribute to society, doesn't raise his life well never matter
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:30:17 UTC No. 16091023
>>16091020
>Am mobilefag
Realise* fuck
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:17:14 UTC No. 16091132
>>16091020
>>16091005
>>16090972
>>16090953
>>16087928
>>16085551
Ad hominem bros...
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Mar 2024 23:18:32 UTC No. 16091869
>>16085537
The sciences are inherently a feminine activity
, because they mostly consist of low-consequence accounting work, lab work (or equivalents in fields beside bio/chem), and needing a high verbal IQ to author a paper that gains some traction, not to mention the networking required in pursuit of the same goal.