Image not available

1280x769

wvfy6.jpg

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16085997

Science has proved that women in the workforce means that low IQ women have more children than high IQ women. What will be the long term effect of this for society?

Anonymous No. 16086013

>>16085997
>Science has proved that women in the workforce means that low IQ women have more children than high IQ women. What will be the long term effect of this for society?
>t. incel loser

Go back to your containment board, asshole.

Anonymous No. 16086018

>>16085997
/sci/ will get worse over time.
Case in point ->>16086013

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16086272

>>16086018
How do we keep the children of low IQ mothers, such as >>16086013, out of /sci/?

Anonymous No. 16086307

>>16085997
>What will be the long term effect of this for society?
Society will self-correct via Nazism (the immune system of societies)

Image not available

1890x1032

selection.jpg

Anonymous No. 16086329

Anonymous No. 16086333

more brown people and less good things

Image not available

183x232

anxiety ridden kike.png

Anonymous No. 16087171

>>16086307

Image not available

1080x1851

1710888408860297.jpg

Anonymous No. 16087208

Anonymous No. 16087215

If you want to have kids you should select good genes. Don't marry dumb women if you don't want dumb kids, as shrimple as that

Image not available

663x844

1710888755928783.png

Anonymous No. 16087218

Anonymous No. 16087867

>>16085997
makes sense

Anonymous No. 16087920

Enjoy brown retard dystopia, you voted for it

Anonymous No. 16087923

>>16085997
>high IQ means less sex
Nothing has changed.

Anonymous No. 16087924

>>16086018
>>16086272
>>16086307
>>16086333
>>16087920
You guys don't know what you're talking about, as usual.

Image not available

1265x711

Screen-Shot-2018-....png

Anonymous No. 16088456

>>16085997
>What will be the long term effect of this for society?
What long term effect? It's here, now, the walking dumb are everywhere already!

Anonymous No. 16088694

>>16088456
>>>/pol/

Anonymous No. 16088745

>tfw negative salary

Anonymous No. 16088746

>>16085997
High iq women make children

Image not available

1080x661

reddit.jpg

Anonymous No. 16089038

>>16086013
You are not welcomed here, go back to preddit.

Anonymous No. 16089042

>>16087924
It means no matter what happens in the war you will be executed. Either hanged, shot in the head, or most probably fried alive in your own fat.

Anonymous No. 16089052

>>16088746
Danielle Twum has no children and she is a world famous research scientist with a PhD

Nik No. 16089056

This graph shows me that women are rational, and some men are nuts. I say some, because I do not fall among them lol.

As income goes up, men have more babies, while women have less. Christ, what is wrong with some of these men is the question.

Image not available

800x820

women are stupid.jpg

Anonymous No. 16090039

>>16088746
>High iq
>women

Anonymous No. 16091677

>>16089052
That fits the pattern described in OP research

Anonymous No. 16091899

>>16087208
No sympathy

Anonymous No. 16091903

>>16089052
I could fix that

Anonymous No. 16092053

>>16087218
>{statement presented as if it were true}, says {some authority figure in the field}
total jurno death.

Anonymous No. 16092300

>>16085997
Dysgenics

Anonymous No. 16092358

>>16085997
long term effect is an increase in average human lifespan, but im talking about a scale of thousands of years. If you mean the next 200 years then its no big deal as these things self-regulate. people are as smart as they need to be.
Again, long term is an increase in lifespan. Childhood will be much longer, people will age slower, common women will be fertile at 60

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16093326

>>16091903
you can't, she is too old to have children

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16094961

>>16093326
maybe she has a younger sister thats still young enough to be fertile

Anonymous No. 16095574

>>16094961
Odds of an African having a sister that was fathered by the same man are pretty low

Anonymous No. 16096886

>>16085997
Women will evolve to be dumber and men to be smarter. If we extrapolate men will become hyper-intelligent and women will become non-sentient reproductive vessels for men. Ironic that it's feminism setting us on this path.

Anonymous No. 16096890

>>16085997
Have you seen idiocracy, OP? It's a good kino and quite pertinent to your question

Image not available

1000x923

feminist_ants.jpg

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16097379

>>16085997

Anonymous No. 16098737

>>16097379
>it takes only 3 generations
feminism started in the 1960s, pic is dead on

Image not available

4988x2847

fevo-09-742639-g001.jpg

Anonymous No. 16098806

>>16085997
>will
lol

Anonymous No. 16098825

>>16086013
Why do you crosspost from reddit?

Anonymous No. 16098943

>>16085997
i never looked into it but does sexual dimorphism play into it at all like will only women get increasingly more retarded or will it affect everyone

Anonymous No. 16099973

>>16098806
all of the lower volume samples in the right side chart are from africa

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16100592

>>16099973
Modern day africans have lower cranial volume than any other human subspecies

Anonymous No. 16100600

>>16085997
I assume based on the picture that you’re using IQ as an acronym for Income Quotient?

Anonymous No. 16100959

>>16085997
Exponentially more stupid.

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16102481

>>16086307
hope so, the sooner the better

Image not available

480x270

1711691836669.gif

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16103021

>>16102481

Anonymous No. 16104280

>>16085997
not good

Anonymous No. 16105839

>>16098825
election tourists from reddit have been swarming all over 4chan for nearly 8 years already

Anonymous No. 16106758

>>16105839
4chan must be very important if all of those Redditiers dedicate so much of their precious and valuable time to spreading political propaganda here

Anonymous No. 16107394

>>16105839
Jannies refuse to ban Reddit because jannies are Reddit

Anonymous No. 16108843

>>16089052
she is an obese alcoholic, nobody would want to marry her

Image not available

1280x850

anunnaki.jpg

Anonymous No. 16108862

>>16098806
That trend down only started after the bronze age collapse.

Anonymous No. 16109203

>>16087208
What causes some people to grow up never understanding basic game theory? Is it no sports as a child or something?

Anonymous No. 16110269

>>16109203
What causes some people to grow up never understanding the purpose and goals of the ZOG media operations that are constantly shoving unhealthy and harmful messages down their throats. Also the picrel you responded to somewhat disproves OP, since the women who were able to overcome their media programming are the ones who have children while the career woman is a genetic dead end.

Anonymous No. 16111551

>>16110269
>career woman is a genetic dead end.
Women are not men, a career is for a man, women have a different purpose in life. People who don't understand that have been poorly educated

Anonymous No. 16112719

>i'm a strong independent woman, i don't need no man
>*becomes a genetic dead end*

Anonymous No. 16113447

>>16112719
Someone who ends up as a genetic endpoint is someone who is low IQ. Career women demonstrate this fact on the job every day

Anonymous No. 16113485

>>16085997
>Caps at only $50k
>Negative income
All this shows is that welfare disproportionately helps non-employed women have kids. It doesn't account for race or IQ. After $50,000 I'm sure that line starts to increase drastically and meet the curve for men as professional women have more children because kids being hugely unaffordably stops being as much of an issue. I know this is just another /pol/ thread but this doesn't have the effect you thought it would. And doesn't support your implication.

Anonymous No. 16115019

>>16090039
TSMT This.
OP should read:
>Science has proved that women in the workforce means that extremely low IQ women have more children than slightly low IQ women. What will be the long term effect of this for society?

Anonymous No. 16115756

>>16085997
None.
The current eugenics agenda is there to prepare for the removal of laziness, while curbing degenerate trends such as autism, narcissism and excessive socialization.
This is done by overstressing and tempting the population, funneling them to their prospective ends. It is very efficient, quite ingenious of its architects.
If you supposedly have a high intelligence and choose to not have children, then you are really not intelligent at all.
We frankly have no use for you. No reduction in intelligence was intended and intelligence will increase on a longer timescale.
Change your ways immediately as you read this, or be forsaken.
It is only the gullible, the addicts, the craven that are impacted, who simplistically assume their own fantasy to be an accurate representation of the world.
Laziness will be removed in the next phase when we convince the cattle's children to not reproduce at all, while providing addiction even more readily than now, anno ~2035.
We will in fact mobilize them to actively protest reproduction, while the civillized, the intelligent and striving take their rightful places and prepare our world for the gates of heaven - luna.
Rest be assured, the system is designed in such a way that everyone who deserves to reproduce, does reproduce, with the end-result being close to optimally efficient and productive for the large growth phase immediately following this time.
This will be the final phase in which all the inept, the lazy and undeserving will be reduced.
The resulting society will exhibit much greater productivity and satisfaction than ours does - it will not resemble ours, but to some extent the world of the early 2000s.
If you can live to this time of around 2050, you will see our true future, as it was meant to happen all along.
We politely apologize for the necessary delays - this next step in our development must must not unravel when we attempt it, or it will have catastrophic results for our species.

Anonymous No. 16116541

>>16115756
whats the tl;dr on that wall

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16117960

>>16116541
nobody will ever know because nobody ever reads long winded, self indulgent rants on 4chan.

Anonymous No. 16118006

>>16113485
>I'm sure that line starts to increase drastically and meet the curve for men as professional women have more children because kids being hugely unaffordably stops being as much of an issue.
Is this a joke? You're pretending to be retarded for some reason?

Anonymous No. 16118516

>>16118006
Female doctors have more kids than average. Stop being a chud.

Anonymous No. 16118523

>>16108862
learning to read and write was a mistake. the need for massive memorization made brains bigger, being able to take notes relieved that pressure.

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16120051

>>16117960
they should lower the character count limit by about 1488

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16120488

>>16106758
4chan is the center of the universe and /sci/ is the most important board of 4chan

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16121261

>>16118516
they don't

Anonymous No. 16121266

>>16085997
I don't care. It is not relevant to me.

Anonymous No. 16121278

>>16118516
The bait quality would be higher with shorter responses. Otherwise not bad though, a golden age is dawning for bait defending women and we will live to see it.

>>16121266
What nursing home are you posting from and how much do I need to be to get my parents in there too?

Anonymous No. 16121290

>>16085997
Eventually it will lead to bifurcation of intelligence along biological sex and hormone criteria. Testosterone will make evolved humans smarter and stronger.

Image not available

580x316

IMG_0730.png

Anonymous No. 16121296

>>16121290 (myself)
Forgot image

Anonymous No. 16121298

>>16086329
what am i looking at

Image not available

379x320

2024-04-10-005010....png

Anonymous No. 16121301

>>16098806
>linear regression on that
bro what are you doing

Anonymous No. 16121304

>>16121278
>What nursing home are you posting from and how much do I need to be to get my parents in there too?
Why do you want to put your parents into a nursing home?

Anonymous No. 16122245

>>16121278
>No argument
I accept your concession

Anonymous No. 16122249

>>16087218
There is no such thing as an "education gene." This retarded view of genetics needs to end.

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16123234

>>16121298
science an sheeeiiiittt

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16124667

>>16087923
Nice cope
If you were truly high IQ and you wanted sex you would be able to figure out how to get it

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16125282

>>16124667
>I'm extremely high IQ
but also
>I can't figure out how to get what I want

the irrational reasoning of a mentally ill person

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16126349

>>16125282
they also like the sour grapes method
>sex isn't actually good
>I'd rather masturbate to pornography

Image not available

3840x3840

hitler was denied....jpg

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16127665

>>16086013

Anonymous No. 16127688

>>16126349
>>16125282
>>16124667
I'm not going to fuck a socialist, unvirgin, or abortion supporter, simple as.
You can try to assign me personal blame for these things or try to peer pressure me into thinking it's unimportant or the REAL issue is some deficiency or insecurity of mine, or I could NEVER get laid, or I must be TERRIFIED of women, or I'm such a KEK to a religion I don't even have, but regardless I still shall not because your memes are cringe and you are out of touch and amoral.

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16128489

>>16127688
not my fault your IQ is too low

Anonymous No. 16128496

>>16128489
Make an actual post to bump the thread you incorrigible lazy fuck

Anonymous No. 16129849

>>16127688
Steer clear of atheists too

Anonymous No. 16129858

>>16085997
How long did it take us to evolve those IQ points that we are now losing? 1000 years? 2000? That might well be the kind of a speed bump this cultural development will impose on human evolution.

Anonymous No. 16129862

>>16121301
That's obviously not linear regression.

Anonymous No. 16130745

>>16129858
4 million years

Anonymous No. 16130961

>>16129849
I am one, I suppose, but that doesn't mean I'm going to stop acting human.

Anonymous No. 16132260

>>16130961
yes it does

Anonymous No. 16132329

>>16132260
No more bot replies pls

Image not available

1080x1080

atheist superstit....png

Anonymous No. 16133498

>>16132329

Anonymous No. 16133671

>>16133498
This is me:
>>16127688
learn to follow a conversation you zealot