Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 15:36:18 UTC No. 16086622

>>16086617
not a counterpoint, but a better hypothesis:

humans are not designed to have monogamous relationships.

However, as the pressure to have successful monogamous relationships culturally is very high humans will gradually evolve to be better suited. we won't live to see it, but others will.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 15:52:49 UTC No. 16086642

>>16086617
If you can't then you are retarded AF.

Barkon !otRmkgvx22 at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 15:55:39 UTC No. 16086646

>>16086642
Heeeeron

WATXT

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:06:55 UTC No. 16086661

>>16086622
We are still genetically identical to humans from 10,000 years ago.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:19:24 UTC No. 16086671

>>16086617
Faarrrkkk sick titties. Awesome post, OP bro. Check out the titties, guys, farrrrrkkk. Would you have sex with her, guys? I totally would. Imagine that, guys. Imagine me having sex with her with all the huge titties and all that, guys. That would be so sick. Faarrrkkk

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:34:20 UTC No. 16086682

>>16086617
I encourage my wife to cheat on me, so I don't need to fuck her myself. Then I have more time for debates on 4chan.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:35:19 UTC No. 16086683

Feminism is the only good thing happening from 200 years of democracy.
Feminism is good because it destroy the grotesque male narrative that men are the stronger sex. The truth is that women sit at the top of the sex market. Women are sex capitalists. It's women who organize the competition . It's men who compete for women and not women who compete for men. So they are right to be very strict about the rules. And since they are the queens, and 99% of men just live to provide for them, they have the luxury of rebuking any male quest they want and imposing on men various duties.
The even bigger picture is that Men never really managed to tame the female sexual cravings. Women cannot be contained in coats of conventions, the female sexual libido is too strong and too violent for this. A women is pure sexual energy. When she discovers this, when she peels off the phony social layers, she merges with her true whorish self and she will never ever be the same.
This is why all societies are flawed inherently. And it doesn't help that all men are eager to please women sexually and non-sexually. democracy is even worse.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:38:42 UTC No. 16086691

>>16086617
Buy an ad.

>evopsych
At least set up an astrology prediction chart nigger, holy shit.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:53:49 UTC No. 16086719

>>16086661
gross oversimplification. are you genetically identical to your mother or father? no, of course not.

Evolution is not a set of rapid changes over short term. evolution is happening now.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:26:31 UTC No. 16086761

>>16086617
honestly those look like a huge burden on her life. I feel bad for her.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:27:18 UTC No. 16086762

yeah and i need to rape

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:32:04 UTC No. 16086768

>>16086617
No because inbreeding dieseases goes through the roof.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:41:25 UTC No. 16086783

>>16086617
There are a number of different reproductive strategies found amongst animal species, and if you're going to appeal to evolutionary psychology you should be aware of that. Many animal species which prioritize parental investment also tend toward monogamous reproduction. Some mate for life, others don't, but to claim outright that the 'natural' human reproductive strategy is zero sum on very flimsy evidence is just stupid. Considering varied human cultures, a number of even tribal cultures practiced very strict monogamy, and by the same estimation such cultures should be more in touch with the 'natural' orientation, no? If you read Tacitus, he describes the marriage customs of ancient Germans in great detail, and by his account they were even more monogamous than Romans were. So among Germanics, monogamous marriage is a social practice that has persisted for 2000 years at the very minimum, and probably much much longer than that, so are you really going to suggest that such a practice is somehow unnatural from an evolutionary psychology perspective?

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:02:40 UTC No. 16086806

>>16086617
> from an evolutionary standpoint
Men need to rape and kill.

" from an evolutionary standpoint " isn't an argument or excuse.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 20:35:21 UTC No. 16086999

>>16086683
YWNBAW

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 21:20:44 UTC No. 16087045

>>16086617
Contrary to popular belief, polygamy is not eugenic and inevitably leads to inbreeding which is why societies that practice it (see India and the middle east) also have the higest rates of inbreeding and are shitholes with dysgenic populations.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 21:21:08 UTC No. 16087047

>>16086617
Scientifically speaking I NEED to impregnate as many big tiddy women as possible, until I either die of exhausting or of old age.

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:42:49 UTC No. 16087637

>>16086661
Yes and psychopaths, autistics, neurotypicals, downies are all able to interbreed. The most violent individualist nigger-mexican hybrid is able to breed with the most passive collectivist east asian. Promiscuity is a similar genetically encoded trait, no reason the human genome has to change by more than a fraction of a percentage for it to be shifted out of trait space

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:51:25 UTC No. 16087645

Evolution is a theory, not a fact.

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:55:01 UTC No. 16087648

>>16086683
the wall is waiting for delusional pretend femoids like you