Image not available

1233x1080

Shouldn't_ex....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16087176

Why have scientist been so bad at predicting what should exist in the universe?

Anonymous No. 16087181

because they're low IQ
the media meme that they're smart is only a recent development, until a few decades ago they were generally considered to be dangerously moronic mental cases.

Anonymous No. 16087242

>>16087176
Because we have to work with limited information the whole time. Also, we often only get the bare minimum of instrumentation. When our pleas are finally answered, we willingly incorporate the new information into our theories rather than clinging to dogma

Anonymous No. 16087246

>>16087176
How would you predict that blue balls exist when you've only ever had evidence for red balls?

Anonymous No. 16087249

Because you get your news from clickbait farms. Read the papers moron.

Anonymous No. 16087265

>>16087176
bias and preconceived notions about what they believe should be true. and also wanting to be apart of a dominant culture, so they adopt the beliefs of people also in that culture, to fit in or gain social status. could be so they get a promotion, so they can get more job opportunities, so they can feel more educated, so they can say they share the same beliefs as experts in the field, or other such reasons.

Anonymous No. 16087268

>guise e=mc^2
>holy shit science always lied to us!

Anonymous No. 16087277

>>16087268
what are you coping about now

Anonymous No. 16087294

there is more and more information, and less and less meaning

Anonymous No. 16087302

>>16087294
so knowing less is the way forward? can you glow even harder?

Anonymous No. 16087306

>>16087302
i'm sure extracting more information out of the universe will resolve all of the contradictions we've produced (and not produce more of them)

Anonymous No. 16087310

>>16087306
what are you afraid we'll discover?

Anonymous No. 16087313

>>16087310
that there was never anything there

Anonymous No. 16087331

>>16087313
There's not there never was

Anonymous No. 16087367

>>16087176
Low quality news articles are not science

Image not available

298x363

Anime_12HeadSmug.jpg

Anonymous No. 16087418

>>16087176
>>16087181
>>16087265

>Let JOURNALISTS tell you about Scientists and their projects & studies.
>Trust in Scientists is at an all time low.
>"How could this have happened? Surely it's the Scientists at fault."

Midwit consumer logic.

Anonymous No. 16087660

>>16087367
>>16087418
it's true tho

Anonymous No. 16088955

bump

Anonymous No. 16088957

>>16087176
Because we’re intelligent (for our planet at least) apes making guesses using currently available technology.

Anonymous No. 16088968

The paper by the scientist:
>this experimental weather model by Xuei Hong et al. had on average, an increased accuracy of 4.86% over other models, but tended to forecast lower temperatures than the observed dataset

The journalists' article about that paper:
>SCIENTISTS PROVE WE'RE ENTERING A NEW FUCKING ICE AGE BITCHES!! THEIR NEW AGI FROM CHINA PROVED THAT SHIT USING QUANTUM CRYPTO BLOCKCHAINS!!! ELON MUSK IS FURIOUS!!

Anonymous No. 16089492

bump