Cult of Passion at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:51:39 UTC No. 16087203

Im imagining a Tooker-flag crashing through the wall one panel after you said this shouting "In the neighborhood!"

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:54:40 UTC No. 16087213

>>16087203
It could happen to anyone nowadays man lmao

For real now is that a reference i dont get?

Cult of Passion at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 23:05:17 UTC No. 16087231

>>16087213
>For real now is that a reference i dont get?
Lets...just wait and see if that flag-man crashes into the thread.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 23:06:48 UTC No. 16087235

>>16087231
If not we make a national flag man day

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 23:20:41 UTC No. 16087252

>>16087231
chilling in the thread is fun while i do math

n wait for morn to come

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 23:26:47 UTC No. 16087256

>>16087192
thinking i should use the functional equation instead

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:22:05 UTC No. 16087801

>>16087192
all of us?
cant one person suffice?

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:14:46 UTC No. 16087974

>>16087801
any amount is ok sometimes i accept one... more... zero... just me..at least one is good

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:34:10 UTC No. 16088005

>>16087192
can you explain like im a first year math postgrad (i am)

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:40:51 UTC No. 16088011

>>16088005
alright lets consider a PARADOXICAL equation

1+(sqrt((x)^2)) equals to -(1+(sqrt((z)^2)

this equation seems impossible right?
something of this type. we basically translate this to "Zeta at R!=1/2, zero is impossible or possible? that means we remove the negative sign at the right hand and compare how close the riemann zeta goes to 0 or to the negative as R deviates from 1/2

its a bit complicated i just got the idea a few days ago.

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:43:47 UTC No. 16088015

>>16088011
i mean how close the squareroot approaches 0

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:49:40 UTC No. 16088023

>>16088011
>>16088015
wait what i meant is, does the comparison of alpha to this paradoxon equal to alpha? i havent managed to do an extensive comparison yet, indepth enough to reveal whether it implies RH is true or false but i think it should give clues

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:58:55 UTC No. 16088032

>>16088023

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 13:04:23 UTC No. 16088035

>>16088032
Imho its not yet proof because some stuff may have to be adjusted and the derivatives compared properly but so far its a good step

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 13:05:04 UTC No. 16088036

>>16087192
Latex to hard for you?

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 13:06:08 UTC No. 16088038

>>16088036
Screens hurt my eyes

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 18:33:15 UTC No. 16088407

>>16088038
A high order derivative of some sorts should yield interesting results some of the terms might have to be transformed a little bit

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 18:57:08 UTC No. 16088433

>>16088407
The idea is that if the derivative comparison in the right corner bottom has an imaginary nonzero number then the rh may be false

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 18:58:22 UTC No. 16088436

>>16088433
i will see if i can come up with something later meanwhile if someone has any ideas its good post em

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 19:03:48 UTC No. 16088440

>>16088433
I think if you can tell whether the derivative comparison is imaginary nonzero this might be a proof the riemann hypothesis is false if its 0 then true

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 19:04:53 UTC No. 16088443

>>16088440
I think this paradoxon comparison should have simplified it by magnitudes

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 19:19:06 UTC No. 16088457

>>16087192
>You all
Blue belly Yankee faggot

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 21:14:39 UTC No. 16088598

Bra im crying bro only bully in this thread im cry