Image not available

1987x1573

wat.jpg

🧵 Cognitive Infrastructure?

Anonymous No. 16087430

What is "Cognitive Infrastructure"?

Anonymous No. 16087451

dark if true

Anonymous No. 16087457

>>16087430
When you tear down natural boundaries, you are letting bugs in. And that's what science has done, escavated mountains and opened trade routes nobody wanted.

People haven't figured it out yet, that part of warfare is taking advantage of natural barriers. The united states, surrounded by two massive oceans, is unlikely to ever be invaded. It's a strategic position.

We are at war forever. Don't let the nerds enter your mind.

Anonymous No. 16087465

>>16087457
stay dumb anon, never change.
also on a serious note, you do fucking realize you're projecting your bullshit on the wrong people. this is nothing that depends on anyone here lmao. it's decided by (them)

Anonymous No. 16087468

>>16087465
Anon this topic has... 2 people in it

Anonymous No. 16087493

>oy got a loicens for thinking in scientific terms?
>sir it is illegal to say 1+1=2 without proper authorization. it is dangerous for our democrasy

Image not available

594x690

clucking chicken.png

Anonymous No. 16087497

>>16087465
we can tell that you're emotional and distraught by you use of profanity

Anonymous No. 16087499

>>16087497
>we
so no argument then?

Anonymous No. 16087509

>>16087430
Infrastructure bills are generally popular with the public, which makes them easy to pass. The Biden administration noticed this and started calling everything "infrastructure" in an attempt to sneak their spending into law. Even increasing food stamps was labeled "human infrastructure".

Image not available

1282x680

1700300563123132.png

Anonymous No. 16087524

>>16087430
https://www.justsecurity.org/60198/election-interference-symptom-evaporation-trust-disease/
>The underlying disease is an assault on trust in the digital age, indeed an assault on what’s arguably our most critical asset: our cognitive infrastructure.

>Think of it as the collective brains of the American polity—our collective consciousness, the fundamentals that we think and believe, the shared understandings of the world that drive our ability to make decisions. For centuries, we took this for granted as a national security asset. That’s because it could be shielded, at least in part, from those who would try to weaken it. Think of Britain’s cutting of Germany’s transatlantic cables on the first day of World War I, thus ensuring that German propaganda could never directly threaten the minds of still-neutral Americans.

>Information operations like Moscow’s assault on the 2016 presidential election, when combined with domestic forces assailing key elements of our democracy and society, are having a corrosive effect on this country’s cognitive infrastructure. Already, many Americans express fundamental doubt about institutions once deemed sacred to our democratic health mere years ago. The free press has become “fake news”; our free and fair elections have become “rigged”; our independent judiciary has become “so-called judges.” What’s next?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jen_Easterly
>Jen Easterly
>special assistant to President Barack Obama and senior director for counterterrorism on the National Security Council
>director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency in the Biden administration

tl;dr: The government thinks it has the right to control what information you see because exposure to competing views can engender mass dissent, which is is a threat to their power and goals.

Anonymous No. 16087525

>>16087524
yeah but that is literally every country on Earth, just that nobody says it out loud.

Image not available

598x466

1693824209090694.png

Anonymous No. 16087526

>>16087525
Yes, but after generations of almost total information control they're losing their grip and freaking out. The only response they can think of is even more censorship.

Anonymous No. 16087534

>>16087526
even in the freest of free systems, due to human nature, there's a bunch of bullshit swept under the rug, due to the sheer number of interactions and happenings. you can't realistically expect it to give ideal results. playing a bit of devil's advocate here.

Anonymous No. 16087536

>>16087534
'Free market of ideas' gives better results than government censorship every time.

Anonymous No. 16087538

>>16087536
>better results
For whom?

Anonymous No. 16087541

>>16087538
Everyone except the government.

Anonymous No. 16087542

>>16087536
yeah but humans can't fast forward like that. sure few top minds can but fast change can spell doom. shit needs properly integrated and when things happen too fast to deal with then the hammer comes down.
not saying they're not doing anything wrong, just that it's also not as easy as you'd think. there's many mouths to feed, many people to please/agree on things. stability is important

Anonymous No. 16087543

>>16087541
Then why would the government favor it?

Anonymous No. 16087546

>>16087542
No one's starving to death because someone on the internet thinks Trump won in 2020.

Anonymous No. 16087548

>>16087546
yet I remember there being some outside interference with organizing some events for both sides in the same area, hoping conflict breaks out.
and the retards bought into it. sure, freedom, but it's akin to say someone getting bad results for not being able to control themselves, alcohol/drugs. when they lose control they need intervention. so is freedom, if too much of it makes for shit results you need to intervene to stop bad things from happening. don't tell me you can't see any way this total freedom could be abused to fuck everything up?

Image not available

1620x1080

1699838794388217.jpg

Anonymous No. 16087549

>>16087548
Censoring the internet to keep some nutjobs from getting baited into a street brawl isn't a proportionate response, especially when the government is hard at work doing its own baiting.

Anonymous No. 16087662

Vomit inducing technopomorphism primitivism article topic
Their infosphere is supposed to enshrine personhood sovereignties
Not just go this that this our that

Anonymous No. 16087679

They're trying to cancel TikTok because unlike every single other major social media outlet, TikTok isn't under the direct control of ZOG

Anonymous No. 16087771

>>16087430
>biden regime
lmao

Anonymous No. 16087783

>>16087430
sounds like a glownigger euphemism that was invented because they don't want to go on record explicitly saying what they really mean

Anonymous No. 16087842

>>16087541
The government is the people, do you mean the puppets that the people put in place, if so why wouldn't the people just replace them if they are taking advantage of the people?

Anonymous No. 16087845

>>16087546
They are just starving to death socially put in isolation chambers and deprived of family and friends because they dare act out and voice their suspicions.

Barkon !otRmkgvx22 No. 16087846

>>16087845
Lights go up. Mood goes down.

Barkon !otRmkgvx22 No. 16087847

>>16087845
U moody

Anonymous No. 16087860

>>16087430
that would effectively mean you are owned by the government.
Everything Under The State, Nothing Above the State.
also its an admittance that PsyOps are perpetually being enacted against the civilian population.

Anonymous No. 16087870

>>16087860
You didn't figure that out when you were forced to accept their serial number and spend your childhood attending their institutions while constantly being tested to verify you have accepted their "facts"?

Anonymous No. 16087871

>>16087465
I'm new to this site and am wondering what you are talking about?gvr8

Anonymous No. 16087880

>>16087870
>accept their serial number
how would you keep track of your own citizens anon? who's who wtf? don't tell me your country should just take your word for it, pinky swear you wouldn't lie?

Anonymous No. 16087883

>>16087880
If you weren't holding claim to them, you wouldn't need to keep track of them.
They don't serialize birds or blades of grass, so why are you so glad to be just another one of their numbers?

Anonymous No. 16087884

>>16087883
you can't be for real. how does anyone else from your neighborhood know who the fuck you are? you can't be this insane. you cannot be for real that you really don't understand how IDs are useful for a society.

Anonymous No. 16087887

>>16087884
I mean someone else who's not from your neighborhood

Anonymous No. 16087896

>>16087884
Yes I am sure you check everyone's social security number every time you sell them a hamburger.

Anonymous No. 16087900

>>16087896
I feel like I lost about 10 IQ points engaging with you. holy shit you are dumb and fucking clueless

Anonymous No. 16087902

>>16087900
No, you just realized you are a serialized cog in a machine who isn't as smart as you first thought.

Anonymous No. 16087907

>>16087884
You can't be for real if you don't understand that civilization existed for thousands of years before they decided to effectively brand persons like cattle.

Anonymous No. 16087965

>>16087884
In older times you relied upon parish birth records.
In ancient times your identity was acclaimed by important men in your village or town

Anonymous No. 16088077

>>16087880
Sure, because that totally works in reality and is not entirely counterproductive at all, leading to the current situation where identity theft is at an all time high since all anyone needs to know is someone's name and serial number to steal their identity, serializing citizens is totally for their protection and not just to have control over them, especially in times of conscription.

Anonymous No. 16088335

Literal mouthbreathing retards ITT thinking this is new. Try looking at the etymology of the word "government".

Anonymous No. 16088495

>>16088335
>this is nothing new and here's a braindead example that misses the point
Thanks for your input, CIA

Anonymous No. 16088512

>>16087430
Americans, are you OK? were you ever really planning on using your guns?

Anonymous No. 16088568

>>16088335
government go vern ment
>go - to walk somewhere
>vern - referring to springtime
>ment - mint
walk to the spring mint

Anonymous No. 16088586

>>16087457
you are one based ass mf

Image not available

1033x831

mexicans.jpg

Anonymous No. 16088708

>>16087457
>is unlikely to ever be invaded.

Anonymous No. 16088716

>>16088708
Refugees are protected by federal law.

Image not available

602x375

361640653.png

Anonymous No. 16088761

>muh serialized cattle
you are clueless fucking dimwits. your retardation is scary. if this is what you have problems with, you are royally fucked
>no but I can plant potatoes that is the ideal form
fucking sad

Image not available

1080x1260

cobson soyence.jpg

Anonymous No. 16088933

>>16087526

Anonymous No. 16089922

>>16087783
>they don't want to go on record explicitly saying what they really mean
which is brainwashing and censorship

Anonymous No. 16090603

>>16087430
Retard framework

Anonymous No. 16090614

>>16087457
Inspiring.

Anonymous No. 16090620

>>16087430
CISA (cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency)

CISA wants control over your consciousness. They define consciousness as "cognitive infrastructure" to be taken control of by the government. In shaping information that your brain processes. It was created after Hillary lost to Trump.

Anonymous No. 16090623

>>16090620
free will everybody

Anonymous No. 16090756

>>16090620
Sounds like the original plot for 'The Matrix'.

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16091912

>>16090756
Thats not a mere coincidence

Anonymous No. 16091957

>>16087430

It's literally a commie Marxist idea. Marx referred to it as the "General Intellect".

>>16087679

As you wish. But all the same, I welcome any endeavor, legislation, or enforcable policy which limits, stymies, bans or suppresses any social media of any kind. Especially those controlled by commies, even if they're just a pack of thugs and commies in name only. And no, 4chan doesn't count so don't bother trying that observation.

Image not available

1488x1488

lolbergs.jpg

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16093239

>>16091957
>noooo!!
>you can't just suppress you enemies!!!
wrong, god says to smite his enemies and to cleanse the earth of them, the desire not to do so is a feature of sissified pussies

Anonymous No. 16093739

>>16090620
All made possible by Obama's repeal of the Smith–Mundt Act

Image not available

333x333

j. stalin on elec....jpg

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16095038

>>16087842

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16095616

>>16087524
>The government thinks it has the right to control what information you see
they don't care about rights, they think they have the ability to what information you see and thats all that counts. ">muh rights" is a bunch of hogwash, you get taught about that junk in school as a means of brainwashing

Image not available

1610x720

marxism.webm

Anonymous No. 16096444

>>16087430
This is cognitive infrastructure. Repent your sins.

Anonymous No. 16096451

>>16087430
Is there any alternative? Statists are already committed to this.

Anonymous No. 16096610

>>16087534
That is a lot of words to say nothing

Anonymous No. 16096612

>>16087534
In a normal scenario, you can always get a second opinion on a matter in terms of health choice. That second opinion was considered misinformation by the government. That is not healthy at all. Trillions exchanged hands in which the creators of the artificial virus and the creator of the anti-virus were paid money and this artificial virus was used to justify censorship.

Anonymous No. 16096738

>>16096612
and everyone in the scientific community went along with it because they are all liars and frauds

Anonymous No. 16096747

Just stop wrongthinking, what is even the problem?

Anonymous No. 16096765

>>16096738
Not everyone. Dissents were censored by the gov and gov imposed will upon the internet

Image not available

1170x945

ntRvD.jpg

Anonymous No. 16096771

Anonymous No. 16096778

>>16096771
Sounds like some conspiracy theorist to me. Hope he got swatted.

Image not available

554x1024

(((the news))).jpg

Anonymous No. 16096799

Image not available

529x646

1711410260911773.png

Anonymous No. 16096893

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16097400

>>16089922
they already have those, what they want to do is make it illegal to not believe their propaganda

Anonymous No. 16098094

>>16089922
>>16097400
DISINFORMATION ALERT!!! WRONG THOUGHT DETECTED. YOU MUST UNDERGO OUR TRAINING TO CORRECT YOUR THOUGHTS

Anonymous No. 16098961

>>16096765
>Dissents
those dissents were an insignificantly tiny percentage of the soientists

Image not available

1200x1200

conspiracy.jpg

Anonymous No. 16099928

>>16098961
soiyence uses the peer review system to shut dissidents up, thats why the peer review system was invented

Anonymous No. 16100026

>>16099928
They also force people to undergo "sensitivity training" aka brain washing to keep your professional license

Image not available

625x626

a48-1534778155.png

Anonymous No. 16100071

>>16087430
>by Jim Hoft

Who the fuck is by Jim Hoft??
>The Gateway Pundit (TGP) (Founded by Jim Hoft) is an American far-right[2] fake news website.[1] The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.[34]

PSA Reminder, there IS propaganda on the internet.
There IS propaganda on 4chan.
There IS propaganda ITT.
The idiots on /sci/ are too dumb to check for propaganda themselves.
78 posts, nobody said this was fake.
The propaganda will likely increase on 4chan because you people fall for the bait every fucking time, and geopolitical forces are revving up their engines for the presidential election this November.

Buckle the fuck up cause this is only gunna get worse kids.

Also OP has literally NOTHING to do with /sci/ except the graphic shows silicon chip photoshopped onto a face. That's literally the extent of why this belongs on /sci/. Silicon photoshopping. GTFO

Anonymous No. 16100119

>>16100071
Jim Hoft is quite literally a plaintiff in this case he's "reporting" on. Don't forget that part.

Anonymous No. 16100136

>>16100071
Next you'll say that castrating children is good, censorship is good, covid wasn't a lab leak, it wasn't man made, ukraine is winning the war in 2 weeks, etc

Anonymous No. 16100158

>>16100071
The problem is faggots like you only pretend to dig. :^)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htRlU0JKdGg

Anonymous No. 16100257

>>16087430
Don't know what it is but I'm sure, magatards are going to get another heart attack over their precious rights of which they already have none.

Anonymous No. 16100270

>>16100158
She's not exactly wrong. Americans' brains are being DDoS'd on a continuous basis.

Image not available

2821x1388

bad leg.jpg

Anonymous No. 16100900

How bad is legacy media disinformation? It’s so bad that a sizable chunk of liberals think the true number of unarmed Black men killed by cops is in the thousands.

The true number? About 11

Cult of Passion No. 16100903

>>16087430
>What is "Cognitive Infrastructure"?
A level of information that has limits, levels of reality you cannot be exposed to or you will freak the fuck out.

Think like weed plants, you keep them in the dark...a flash of Light can burn them at the wrong times and alter their trajectory in life, almost always a kind of worsening.

Image not available

600x600

balancing-rocks.jpg

Cult of Passion No. 16100906

Thats the Matrix.

Its not true...until its true the only moment that counts...

Cult of Passion No. 16100924

>>16100903
>almost always a kind of worsening.
Should be organic and self understood, if its handed to humans they may forget it and not understand why their way of life disappeared, as Ive noted in history, such as Library of Alexandria, in that the library needed to be destroyed because some aspect of intellect or moral fortitude was needed in the people, adding "experimental weaponry" to that future equation was a clear NO-GO.

Anonymous No. 16102251

>>16100900
Thats what happens to you if you consume the goyslop mainstream press

Anonymous No. 16102367

>>16087430
Fuck off the government doesn't own me and if they got a problem with that then they can shove it up their ass.

Image not available

536x400

lulz.jpg

Anonymous No. 16102887

>>16102367
>the government doesn't own me
thats only your opinion

Anonymous No. 16103207

>>16087468
How can you tell? The IP counter's been gone for a while now.

Anonymous No. 16103247

>>16088716
>people with your worst interests in mind welcome the invaders so it's okay

Anonymous No. 16103275

>>16100071
>falsehoods
>hoaxes
>conspiracy theories
Well that's just the same thing MSNBC does but with DNC-approved falsehoods, hoaxes and conspiracy theories.

Anonymous No. 16103281

>>16100071
>There IS propaganda on 4chan.
Yes, and you're spreading it.

Image not available

1x1

leftopia - r9k book.pdf

Anonymous No. 16104050

Anonymous No. 16104299

>>16103275
MSNBC isnt just DNC approved propaganda, they literally hire from DNC prominent political figures and have them spread their propaganda on the platform. Its a propaganda channel all on its own.

Image not available

846x1074

1571488694201352.jpg

Anonymous No. 16105844

>>16104299
and its owned by bill gates.

Image not available

1276x693

sangger.jpg

Anonymous No. 16106766

>>16100071
>There IS propaganda on 4chan.
but apparently you believe wikipedia is totally clean of propaganda because you trust every word on wikipedia as if it was handed down by god himself

Image not available

588x680

gSe9l6.jpg

Anonymous No. 16106883

Image not available

1080x1061

pd.jpg

Anonymous No. 16106943

>>16106883

Anonymous No. 16107451

>>16103207
schizo intuition

Anonymous No. 16107493

>>16087524
>Think of Britain’s cutting of Germany’s transatlantic cables on the first day of World War I, thus ensuring that German propaganda could never directly threaten the minds of still-neutral Americans.
Imagine pretending that this is what a free country would do.
If people fall for the propaganda then the propaganda is considered more correct. That's what happened with the covid propaganda. Why should the Russians not be allowed to spread their propaganda but the Americans are? Are the Americans afraid the Russians are more correct?

Anonymous No. 16107628

>>16106883
Ok, so now that you do know society is a prison, how can you escape?

Anonymous No. 16107712

>>16107628
Kill politicians
the political class is maybe 500 families at most. You literally only need 500 men to act and kill a politician. Obviously I'm not advocating anything. Just stating pure facts. If a decentralised group of people had just 500 people to kill higher level politicians, you'd completely topple this society.

Anonymous No. 16108584

>>16107712
Murdering the politicians who run a country would just lead to other politicians taking over. In the end very little would change except that you would make politics more darwinian in a negative way.

Also, I personally don't believe that all powerful people are morally corrupt (just in case you think of murder as a penalty).

Anonymous No. 16108590

>>16107712
We're not like this because of bad politicians. Politicians cannot ocupy that position if they don't perfectly represent the population. At least not for long. In a strange way they are (almost) always the perfect representation of the people.
What you don't like is that the people are as fucked up as the politicians that represent them. Which ties into human nature and the environment.

Image not available

980x551

Scholz.jpg

Anonymous No. 16108627

>>16108590
Politicians don't represent the population. They represent the political process.

Image not available

1644x1018

benford's law.jpg

Anonymous No. 16109488

>>16108590
>Politicians cannot ocupy that position if they don't perfectly represent the population.
oy vey elections are totally real

Image not available

501x600

WJyT.png

Anonymous No. 16109594

Anonymous No. 16109609

>>16109488
Was anymore research ever done on this? Do all election data follow these rules? This seems like the sort of question where all of the data should be out there.

Anonymous No. 16110098

>>16108590
lmao. Politicians dont represent the population. They just represent a narrative driven in the region.

Anonymous No. 16110102

>>16108627
>If I dress like a supervillain no one could ever possibly expect me to be actually evil

Anonymous No. 16110106

>>16109609
It's called Benford’s Law
1 is the most common number in most all measurements followed by 2 and so on.
Why? Is it magic? No it's just logarithms and people using units with teens more likely than other things

Anonymous No. 16110155

>>16087457
>And that's what science has done, escavated mountains and opened trade routes nobody wanted.
Yeah because boomers all read psychology and then repeated Freud cured them of talking to the dead then go to sleep and have dreams about talking to the dead. They literally read fake shit and let themselves be token overloaded cause even the elites are LLMs deep down since they have no soul.

Anonymous No. 16110160

>>16107712
That is just digging in deeper and becoming more enslaved to society by taking a bigger role in managing it yourself.

Image not available

227x250

1711931657665283s.jpg

Anonymous No. 16110428

>>16087457

Anonymous No. 16110594

>>16110106
Great, now post the study following all election data to verify it. This must exist right? Nations care about election integrity don't they?

Anonymous No. 16110643

>>16087524
>>Information operations like Moscow’s assault on the 2016 presidential election, when combined with domestic forces assailing key elements of our democracy and society, are having a corrosive effect on this country’s cognitive infrastructure. Already, many Americans express fundamental doubt about institutions once deemed sacred to our democratic health mere years ago. The free press has become “fake news”; our free and fair elections have become “rigged”
Yo, nigga, play that back. What did you say about the 2016 election?
>Moscow’s assault on the 2016 presidential election
Yo, yo, yo, cool shit, that's mad legit, for real, for real. Now what's this fake ass shit that the stupid people be tryin' to hawk?
>our free and fair elections have become “rigged”
Damn straight! Fuck Moscow, yo. But what's the lie, again? I forgot about the lie part.

Anonymous No. 16110662

>>16087430
>115 posts
>Not a single person posted the fucking link, or realizes that this is 100% true because OP is a literal nigger ape.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/05/biden-regime-designates-your-thoughts-as-part-government/

The Gateway Pundit previously reported in May that then Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, along with Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, filed a lawsuit (Missouri v. Biden) against the Biden Administration, including Biden himself, Anthony Fauci, the Department of Homeland Security, and nearly a dozen federal agencies and Secretaries. Schmitt has moved on to represent Missouri in the US Senate.

The suit alleges a massive coordinated effort by the Deep State (permanent administrative state) to work with Big Tech to censor and manipulate Americans – from average citizens to news outlets – on issues including the Hunter Biden Laptop from Hell, 2020 Election Integrity, COVID-19 origin and extent skepticism, COVID-19 vaccine skepticism, among other issues.

The Gateway Pundit reported back in August 2022, that TGP’s Jim Hoft himself became the lead non-governmental plaintiff in the lawsuit against the government.

Tracy Beanz at UncoverDC has been closely following the Missouri versus Biden case for several months now.

On Wednesday Tracy posted on recent findings in the case. The most shocking item discovered is that the Biden regime designates YOUR THOUGHTS as part of the government infrastructure. They call it the “cognitive infrastructure” and they believe that they have the right to control it.

Talk about Orwellian!

These lawless beasts believe they have the right to control your thoughts. And that is exactly what they have been doing.

The Missouri and Louisiana attorneys

[the article continues with an excerpt from a different article.] (cont'd)

Anonymous No. 16110667

https://www.uncoverdc.com/2023/05/24/the-lead-up-to-the-hearing-missouri-v-biden/
Missouri v. Biden was filed on May 5, 2022. Since it was initially filed, it has taken quite a trip through the court system. The complaint has been amended 3 times, with the most recent Amendment being to transform the case into a class suit - due to the overwhelming evidence of broad harm to the constitutional rights of all Americans. You can view the docket by using this link. Part I:

The complaint alleged that the US Government was not only threatening and coercing social media companies to censor Americans on social media, but they were also working WITH social media companies to accomplish that goal.
(contd)

Anonymous No. 16110668

>>16110667

It alleged that topics surrounding COVID-19, the origins of COVID, the Great Barrington Declaration, election integrity concerns, the COVID shot, the Hunter Biden laptop story (and more) were under scrutiny by the White House and other government agencies - and that the government had very publicly threatened to take action against social media companies should they not act to censor viewpoints on those topics that were disfavored by the government.

The Plaintiffs in the case (the states of Missouri and Louisiana, along with several other private plaintiffs) moved for expedited discovery to be able to obtain a limited set of evidence as well as depositions of certain officials. They argued that this evidence would allow them to make the case for a temporary injunction to stop the government from infringing on the first amendment rights of Plaintiffs and their citizens.

Unlike what many have come to expect, the judge GRANTED the motion for expedited discovery and depositions. A struggle ensued between the Government and the Plaintiffs, with the government fighting against the judge in this case (Judge Terry Doughty) to stop discovery and certain plaintiffs from being deposed. They took those complaints to the 5th Circuit of Appeals and a court in Virginia - a court that *usually* is friendly to the government.

At the appellate court level, the government argued that NO ONE should have to leave their government jobs to sit for lengthy depositions in this case, but certainly not the HEAD of CISA, for example.

The appellate court wouldn't play ball with the government and remanded the case back to Louisiana with some guidance on how the judge should proceed. If memory serves me right, this happened three times.

Anonymous No. 16110669

>>16110668 (contd)
One particularly interesting exchange came with the deposition of former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki. She made threats to social media companies from the podium. They sought to depose her about those threats. She left the office. The government said they had no responsive documents to explain her comments. So Missouri and Louisiana said, "Then we have to depose Jen Psaki."

The court agreed and ruled that now private citizen Psaki needed to testify. The government and Psaki- represented by Rhee - went to a court in Virginia to try to get THAT judge to stop the deposition.

The judge, in that case, laid into both the government and Psaki. It was so stunning I literally read the transcript of the hearing as its own video.

This went back to Louisiana after the Virginia judge said, "You won't like how I rule on this, and your argument is terrible, so I'm sending it back to the judge who SHOULD be making this decision. The judge in Louisiana again decided Psaki should be deposed IF the government didn't have any responsive docs from the press office. Somehow, those docs must've appeared.

All along the way, the government has lost- over and over again. They were also caught hiding discovery materials - the judge rapped them and ordered them to produce or else - which they did.

Another interesting tidbit - once Fauci was deposed, the government sought to seal all depositions and video - along with discovery materials arguing that the government "employees" were being threatened and harassed and faced imminent harm but couldn't produce any examples. The judge ruled against sealing anything but personal info like addresses.

So far, I've only really discussed the procedural happenings — however, what limited expedited discovery, in this case, has exposed (separate and apart from the Twitter files) is unprecedented and abhorrent.

(contd)

Anonymous No. 16110672

>>16110669
The most widespread and troubling discovery? CISA has designated YOUR THOUGHTS part of the government's infrastructure. They call it "cognitive infrastructure."

They argue they can regulate what you think as they consider it under their purview. Here are just a few other troubling discoveries:

https://www.uncoverdc.com/2023/01/14/the-6-most-shocking-recent-revelations-of-government-censorship/

Recently the Plaintiffs filed their motion to support the temporary injunction - a hearing we have been waiting on for nearly a year because of the government's delays and obfuscations. It was 1,200 FACTS about government-coordinated censorship.

The government responded with a 1200-page monstrosity arguing they did it all - but because of foreign actors and the "safety" of the American people - lest they be exposed to harmful "misinformation." Then they asked the judge to give them another week and postpone this hearing - again, arguing they wouldn't have time to digest the Plaintiff's response to their last filing.

The judge told them he wouldn't be postponing this hearing again. A few days ago, the Plaintiffs filed their response - and it is an encyclopedia of their expedited and limited discovery so far. I want to explain why this case is NOT like any other we have seen.

This isn't what we are used to — a weak judge capitulating to the government. In fact, the judge hasn't capitulated ONCE. Neither has the appellate court, and neither has a DC court.

What is the remedy sought? Well, if the temporary injunction is granted (I am nearly certain it will be), the remedy is to bar the government from working with social media companies to flag and censor posts. They will also be barred from working through NGOs to do the same. (Here's looking at you, EIP and Stanford internet observatory, and Atlantic Council) - no FBI task force inside Facebook or Twitter, no emails back and forth about "vaccine misinfo" and how to stop it. The government has to Cease.

(contd)

Image not available

1678x1236

1710048876811034.jpg

Anonymous No. 16110674

>>16110672
What follows will be a detailed breakdown of the latest filing, an answer to the government's excuses for why

A. What they did isn't really censorship (mainly that they didn't *force* the social media companies to take action)

B. Why what they did is "OK." The guise of national security and "safety" and protecting Americans from "Mis, dis, and Malinformation."

They begin with a hypothetical. They do this because the government tried to make all this behavior "Ok" by claiming that the Trump administration did the same thing.

That is an exercise in futility- the plaintiffs don't care WHAT administration did it, only that it happened, and besides- the Trump White House directed NONE of this activity.

As an added zing, they used book burning as their hypothetical- appeals directly to the left angry that we don't want pornographic books in kids' libraries.

The defendant's "Statement of Facts" is rife with "disinformation," a term they have used as a guise to trample the 1st Amendment rights of Americans…

In the very first sentence of the brief, the government filed to argue why there should NOT be a temporary injunction halting their communication and threats to social media companies- they hide behind the "Foreign" assaults on critical election infrastructure.

However, evidence obtained in this case demonstrates that the Federal government overwhelmingly targets DOMESTIC speech by American citizens.

Depositions and evidence obtained in the case prove that actors responsible for censorship admit that most of what they consider "misinformation" was DOMESTIC in nature, including from the EIP (Keep the EIP front of mind).

The Virality Project, the "medical bureaucrac--

>THE ARTICLE GOES ON, BUT IT INCLUDES A BUNCH OF LEGAL SCREENSHOTS LIKE PIC RELATED, AND ANYONE SMART ENOUGH TO GIVE A FUCK WHAT'S PRINTED ON THOSE PAGES, WILL HAVE TO EXERCISE THE AGENCY TO CLICK THE LINK.
https://www.uncoverdc.com/2023/05/24/the-lead-up-to-the-hearing-missouri-v-biden/

Image not available

768x1366

1685651997941525.png

Anonymous No. 16110730

>>16110594
Not him, but this is applied to virtually all disciplines to detect fraud, mostly in finance.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benford%27s_law

Image not available

1x1

Brown_georgetown_....pdf

Anonymous No. 16110754

>>16110730
It must be empirically observed before applied. Asserting numerical properties is irrelevant if a system is set up in such a way to defy the numerical property. Where has this law been applied to elections before? This data should exist.
It also seems like the law is not sufficient for election and it begs the question, which methods are verified for detecting fraud in election?

Anonymous No. 16111558

>>16110594
Thats been posted here before, janny always deletes it

Anonymous No. 16112473

>>16110662
Yeah.

Image not available

1170x1142

img.png

Anonymous No. 16112751

Anonymous No. 16113353

>>16111558
Why?

Image not available

602x609

f9864211a7.jpg

Anonymous No. 16114662

Destroying all connections to any preexisting systems of belief leaves a blank slate, thats why ZOG shills atheism so hard. Religion naturally protects against brainwashing

Image not available

575x957

p27Hs8uJEW0c.png

Anonymous No. 16114735

Anonymous No. 16115650

>>16114662
Religion is a worldview. Its taught in churches and from childhood as a form of brainwashing. But its pretty tame/benign compared to the worldview brought upon by atheistic/scientific worldview where there is nothing objective in the world and everything is permitted from killing babies to castrating children to castrating yourself to doing all sorts of immoral actions.

The reason modern religion is tame/benign today (in the west/eastern religion) is due to de-emphasis on violence and more on actual care. Whereas in the past (and now in the confusion brought by atheism), its the care in the name of ideological framework. In the name of ideological purity, castration and depopulation cult ideology are dominant form of dogma in today's atheistic world

Image not available

1024x715

jidf payscale.jpg

Anonymous No. 16116547

>>16112751
>Your account will be submitted to a group that scours timelines for potential rules violations.
that group?
the jidf (michael mann is jewish)

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16117782

>>16114735
Normies are like that because they are low IQ.
Just look at the qualities of atheists scientists vs. religious ones
Atheist scientists like Neil Tyson, Dawkins, etc. have never had any meaningful or useful success in their fields, all of the top big brain scientists were people of religious belief.
Atheists go into an experiment looking for the result they predict and they will force any result to fit their predictions in order to prove how smart they are, religious scientist go into an experiment looking forward to getting the result that God creates and they will honestly accept that result as God's will.

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16118151

>>16117782
Its like that because atheists presume that they are god. Narcissist personality disorder and atheism are the same mental illness

Anonymous No. 16118167

shaping that cognitive infrastructure I see... ever wondered why they keep lambasting you with the same bullshit over and over again?

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16119861

>>16118167
Repetition is the most effective brainwashing tool

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16120466

>>16119861
thats why you had holocaust history class every year in elementary school through high school and why the hollywood jews publish a new holocaust movie every month

Image not available

1200x750

hebewood.jpg

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16121308

>>16120466

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16122025

>>16109609
Elections are real when (((globohomo))) gets the result it wants, otherwise they're fake, thats what the data says

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16123185

>>16115650
>$5600/month
thats more than scientists make

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16124674

>>16123185
If you're referring to >>16116547 picrel then thats 2020 money, they get a lot more these days due to inflation.

Anonymous No. 16124692

>>16124674
>they get a lot more these days due to inflation.
That's not how inflation works.

Anonymous No. 16124874

>>16106943
>easter
>image of the harrowing of hell

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16125532

>>16124692
yes it is

Anonymous No. 16125586

>>16125532
No one gets raises to match inflation when it goes out of control, you just get your annual 2-3% raise and it goes less far.

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16126373

>>16125586
that only happens to cucks

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16127648

>>16100900
With that kind of information we can quantify how bad it is,

Image not available

307x364

1703728829821552.gif

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16128399

>>16127648
according to those numbers about 99.9% what people who expose themselves to (((media))) believe is real is actually false

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16129758

>>16125586
If you do that then you end up with new hires getting paid more than you, don't be too lazy to look for a new job. Last time I was offered a job I immediately demanded 20% more than they were offering and they gave in

Image not available

272x446

soyence expert.jpg

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16130731

>>16115650

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16132066

>>16114735
media brainwashing

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16132766

>>16087430
Their propaganda techniques are no longer effective enough due to their own incompetence so now they're coping my imagining comic book junk like direct mind control is possible.
These are the same numbskulls who spent fortunes in the 1980s trying to find out how psychics worked.

Anonymous No. 16133757

>>16114735
average /sci/ poster

Image not available

720x885

transhumanist.jpg

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16134467

>>16106883

Anonymous No. 16135510

>>16114735
Its always nice to be reminded that soiyjaks are realistic, representational artwork

Image not available

325x306

e79ade37d6c9b6dc0....jpg

Anonymous No. 16136522

>>16110662
>Talk about Orwellian!

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16137912

>>16109594
lol

Anonymous No. 16138027

Can the free market provide cognitive infrastructure? It can't provide any other infrastructure..

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16138711

>>16138027
Is In-Q-Tel part of the free market?

Anonymous No. 16139671

>>16138711
Nobody on /sci/ knows what In-Q-Tel is except for two or possibly 3 people. Even most of the glowniggers have never heard of it

Anonymous No. 16139755

what nobody is gonna admit is they already determined this a long time ago
GATE (Gifted and Talented Education) is all about identifying children with psychic influence and attempting to stop it at a young age. If you fight their shit enough they will not be able to stop you from influencing and changing things.

Anonymous No. 16141232

>>16135510
i actually find that to be particularly disheartening

Image not available

500x962

Z4HNA.jpg

Anonymous No. 16141351

Anonymous No. 16141354

>>16141351
can the amount of damage you would have incurred without the crazy surveillance be quantized somehow? like you'd have this much extra damage which can be compared to the loss of privacy?

Anonymous No. 16142734

>>16141354
That would be an interesting project

Image not available

554x1024

(((the news))).jpg

Anonymous No. 16143581

>>16106883

Anonymous No. 16144762

>>16141354
If that could be quantized or not is irrelevant because publishing it wouldn't be permitted

Image not available

1166x740

3a8fd899447e8837c....png

Anonymous No. 16144880

Anonymous No. 16144885

It turns out that because we live in a democracy, your opinions do in fact become a matter of national security due to a hilarious reducto ad absurdum which posits that because you can choose bad political candidates (what's "bad" here?) you are a threat to the US, which as a circular argument for democracy is breathtaking in its authoritarianism but exactly the kind of sharp-toothed edgy realpolitik that gets the pundits excited

It is a well-known weakness of the political system that people can be manipulated into voting for anything, but this is a trial balloon for gatekeeping your vote

Anonymous No. 16145976

>>16144880
good pic
vert revealing

Anonymous No. 16146069

>>16087430
... about to collapse due to corrupt officials cutting corners to scam a buck just like our literal infrastructure

Anonymous No. 16146076

>>16087549
imagine being the 1 poor sod in picrel who got dupe by all the glowies...

Image not available

1080x1037

02ddbfc79e52e2406....jpg

Anonymous No. 16146261

>>16144880

Image not available

768x758

GwIPiJgTUI.jpg

Anonymous No. 16146286

>>16144880

Anonymous No. 16147569

>>16146069
There was an event in northeastern Europe in the 1700s or 1800s when they tried to have a war, but the corruption on both sides was so bad that all of the funds earmarked for gunpowder and ammunition was stolen by government officials so the military campaigns has to be called off

Anonymous No. 16148291

>>16147569
the USSR send some of their conscripts into battle unarmed, they had to find a dead guy and take his weapons. they saved a lot of money that way

Anonymous No. 16148325

>>16148291
who killed the dead guy then?

Anonymous No. 16148740

More importantly, what is a overlately disclosed Cognitive architechture?

Anonymous No. 16148744

>>16087430
Ok from the basics somatoperception->perception

Anonymous No. 16148754

https://www.toolify.ai/ai-news/the-rise-of-postdiscontent-societies-the-role-of-machine-overlords-8758

Anonymous No. 16149005

>>16148744
->Cognition->Experience andor Intersectionality andor Reception
?

Anonymous No. 16149070

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUQ5WkAv3Y8

Anonymous No. 16149567

>>16148325
Given the K:D ratios in that war, probably a German

Image not available

711x757

5oc.png

Anonymous No. 16149574

Anonymous No. 16149575

>>16100026
>They also force people to undergo "sensitivity training" aka brain washing to keep your professional license
proofs?

Anonymous No. 16150749

>>16087457
>escavated
is that the same as exclavation?

Anonymous No. 16152259

>>16149574
>radicalization
Basic NLP

Anonymous No. 16153391

>>16152259
Yep, indirectly defining anyone who even slightly criticizes the current administration as a terrorist

Image not available

1000x1000

st,small,845x845-....jpg

Anonymous No. 16154153

>>16153391

Image not available

1000x500

1984-george-orwel....jpg

Anonymous No. 16155275

>>16154153

Anonymous No. 16156106

>>16096444
All whites are born with original sin and are responsible for the holocaust that never happened and for the transatlantic slave trade that was run by jews

Image not available

67x80

Capture.png

Anonymous No. 16156365

>>16155275

Anonymous No. 16157463

>>16153391
these are the same people who claim that they're supportive of diversity, but if you say anything they disagree with they chimp out at you. so to them "diversity" means "people who are like me"

Anonymous No. 16157536

>>16108590
Voters are <nudged> towards certain position by the environment which in the US primarily is privately owned companies parts of business conglomerates of various sectors. Some of these sectors sell a "cure" to a problem created by another by being normalized in a third (media).
>Health- junk food - TV
is the obvious example. A Hollywood movie have the characters flashing BRAND normalizing it more or less subconsciously in people's minds.
Americans are very prone to regarding going to war in far away cultures as morally good despite just the thought of someone else doing it in opposite roles is the worst thing ever.
This is the power of propaganda and mass media. It has been exploited through the undemocratic nature of private ownership and its biggest competitor is the so called public ownership through governments. That has been demonized to ridiculous lengths (by marking it as "commie" despite democracy being another pillar).
Without a democratic foundation this holds true
>>16108584
>would just lead to other politicians taking over.
But politicians are at least elected. Even if <nudged> forward as peoples first choice by undemocratic powers.
Nudging gained worldwide attention with the Nobel prize in economics 2017. It is nothing but soft manipulation which is not inherently bad when it is towards better choices. A good choice for democracy is people voting with a complete grasp of society and how its constituents interact. The voter is nudged towards learning more and casting a vote when something shakes up taken-for-granted discourse. Trump and the storming of the congress are such examples.
Tying back to medicine and business; when it stands clear for people there's a connection between their media consumption and nutrition, first THEN will they jump to action by feeling armed with KNOWLEDGE. It will help them forgiving themselves for past failures just like the knowledge about propaganda helped the post-Nazi era Germans forgive themselves

Anonymous No. 16158574

>>16157536
>But politicians are at least elected
nope
election results are all faked, winners are preselected by ZOG
see >>16109488 hitler dubs get for the data that proves election results are faked

Image not available

1080x1193

lLcMhDYm6bB2.jpg

Anonymous No. 16158683

>>16153391

Anonymous No. 16160184

>>16146261
>Do people get it yet?
Yes, but since the media is controlled by zionists that reality is not reflect in the public press or by government actions.

Image not available

656x960

trot.jpg

Anonymous No. 16161560

>>16152259
Just another one of their many, many scare words

Image not available

434x308

IMG_6847.gif

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16161624

>>16087451
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=md6gekqjjVU

Anonymous No. 16162713

>>16091957
whatever you think isn't important if you're not allowed to say it. if everyone is only allowed to say whats acceptable then thats a substitute for the "General Intellect" even if nobody believes it

Anonymous No. 16163461

>>16087430
Fancy term for brainwashing

Anonymous No. 16164280

>>16087430
brain train.

Anonymous No. 16164480

>>16109609
>Was anymore research ever done on this?
Sure.
In a YT video that at first glance looked quite plausible, it was (correctly) pointed out that benford's Law requires the population of events or votes to span several orders of magnitudes. So far, so good.
Next it was shown that the unnatural distribution was the result of that condition not holding, so little over one order of magnitude, so what we see is then a binomial distribution plus a peak at 1 from the next order of magnitudes.

What is strange here is that in the diagram in >>16109488 Biden had a lower span but more voters than Trump, whose distribution is more like was expected. Thisleaves two unanswered questions:
1: how could more votes lead to a lower span?
2: how could less voters be closer to Benford's Law than a set with more votes?

Anonymous No. 16165291

>>16164480
Nobody can figure out the Benford's law stuff

Anonymous No. 16166393

>>16087430
sounds like glowniggery newspeak

Anonymous No. 16166409

>>16164480
This is too hypothetical. There should be hard data specifically on elections and Benford's law. There is no telling how likely it is for one candidate to follow it and another not to.
Is county data maintained in the United States? This is something that should be very easy to gauge over a long period.
https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/series/59
Would a dataset like this be the appropriate one to go after?

Image not available

234x255

1708157223458.png

Anonymous No. 16167697

>>16166393
>please stop noticing

Anonymous No. 16168525

>>16087430
The fact that they presume they need something like this to rule a """"democracy""""" pretty much proves that its not a democracy

Anonymous No. 16169581

>>16168525
not only that, but you also have to pay for their propaganda and lies

Anonymous No. 16170090

>>16110155
>Even the Elites are LLMs deep down since they have no soul
kek

Anonymous No. 16170965

>>16170090
They're LNMs
N is for nose

Image not available

518x560

bertberg.png

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16171826

>>16170965

Anonymous No. 16172212

>>16087430
>What is "Cognitive Infrastructure"?
The GUI of interpretative perception:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dd6CQCbk2ro

Image not available

275x183

images.jpg

Anonymous No. 16172704

>>16087524
Just that old lalilulelo bullshit.

Anonymous No. 16173132

>>16166393
Thats pretty much what it is. Glowniggers are so twisted that they can't even openly say amongst themselves "lets spread lies and misinformation in order to benefit ourselves" so instead they have to come up with polite euphemisms for it

Anonymous No. 16174643

>>16173132
>its not "murdering babies", its "abortion"
same logic

Anonymous No. 16174784

>>16087524
>exposure to competing views can engender mass dissent, which is is a threat to their power and goals.
What if their goals are to maintain a powerful, thriving, and sovereign nation, and the "competing views" simply seek to dismantle the nation's international wealth and power so they can take it for themselves?

Image not available

1125x1418

Cm25d.jpg

Anonymous No. 16175799

Glowniggers have mind control tech and they're using it on you

Anonymous No. 16175826

>>16087457
Based

Image not available

2048x1175

IMG_1097.png

Anonymous No. 16175844

>>16099928
Peer review is murder of a kind

Anonymous No. 16176118

>>16087430
>(((Biden Regime)))

Anonymous No. 16176842

>>16175844
Good pic

Image not available

637x684

(((bolsheviks))).jpg

Anonymous No. 16177691

>>16176118
just because nearly everyone working in the white house is jewish doesn't mean theres some sort of conspiracy going on

Anonymous No. 16177723

>>16096893
qrd on this? i'm assuming it sweeps social media for anti vaccine sentiment
why would i have a social media? and especially why would i post about my own personal medical decisions on it?

Anonymous No. 16177731

>>16112751
someboddy get the ADL on the line oy vey

Anonymous No. 16177737

>>16144880
>talked about this to my gf
>now she thinks im a crazy lunatic and not just quirky
:(

Anonymous No. 16178856

>>16177737
shes a feminist bitch and you're better off without her, find a decent woman who actually wants to be female

Anonymous No. 16179444

>>16178856
This, never date a feminist. They literally hate men, they only date men to jew them and torture them

Image not available

1000x923

feminist ants.jpg

Anonymous No. 16180638

>>16179444

Anonymous No. 16181121

>>16177691
Even if there was a conspiracy afoot, it illegal to say anything because that would be "hate speech"

Anonymous No. 16182084

>>16181121
thats part of the conspiracy

Anonymous No. 16182172

Congrats, you guys were lucky enough to be born at the beginning of the era of hybrid ideological-memetic-philosophical conflict. All the shit you're seeing - government agencies attempting to carefully control sources and pipelines of information, astroturfed meme campaigns, blatant retardation believed by millions of people (see the whole Q thing), truth getting drowned out by a firehose of obfuscating bullshit, memes from 4chan seeping into real political discourse - is part of an immense struggle between competing metaphysical structures, themselves far beyond the scope of any one person, entity, or group, but pervasive and influential enough to draw dozens or hundreds of such groups into their orbits.
If you see any of this as simply "the government wants to control the people" or "Country A is undermining Country B" you're missing the forest for the trees. Hell, if you see it as "multipolar strongman ideology versus American market liberalism" you're still thinking on too small of a scale. The people pulling strings behind the curtains are just as confused and caught up in the sweep of things as you are, they just have more powerful means to react to it all (though arguably this makes them less free than the average Joe).

Anonymous No. 16182330

>>16181121
If there wasn't a conspiracy it wouldn't be illegal to suggest there is one.

Anonymous No. 16183427

If my thoughts are part of government infrastructure then how come they aren't paying me anything for them?

Anonymous No. 16183684

>>16087465
lol this pussy nigga wont even put 3 parentheses

Image not available

487x747

3u2vkLaEUSeh.png

Anonymous No. 16185012

>you must wear an electronic dog collar for the rest of your life because global warming or something

Anonymous No. 16185471

>>16185012
>bridging the global identity gap
What exactly is the "global identity gap" and why should it be bridged?

Anonymous No. 16186786

>>16185471
because the people who lie cheat and steal have driven themselves into paranoia as a result of worrying about the potential consequences of their own behavior