Image not available

1112x900

set.png

🧵 1 + 1 = 2 proof

Anonymous No. 16087504

Why modern mathematics is like this? Why would you build all of mathematics using sets?

Anonymous No. 16087505

>>16087504
>1+1 = 2 by definition
Define "definition."

Anonymous No. 16087514

>>16087504
That's not actually a proof involving the ordinary language notion of one.
In principia mathematica, they actually define the cardinal 1 there to be the class of all unit classes. Which isn't what the ordinary meaning of one is, of course.

Anonymous No. 16087558

>>16087504
Set theoretic mathematics is just so much more powerful, especially when you're talking about topological spaces and measures.

There's a whole world of applied math (e.g., applied probability theory, differential equations, computability, optimization) that are made so much more tractable when you formulate your problems properly in terms of functions on sets, sigma-algebras and topological spaces.

Anonymous No. 16087727

>>16087505
define “define”

Anonymous No. 16087754

>>16087558
Made obsolete by category theory (also very jewish).

Anonymous No. 16087760

>>16087558
there is still an Aryan way of talking about sets
>natural numbers are primitive
>real numbers are primitive but they are the same as strings of digits
>sets of these things are what they should be
>pairs and sequences are what they should be
of course you can re-judaize this approach, and then it becomes Type Theory. but for the Aryan mathematician this is enough
>>16087754
>category theory
It isn’t 2010 anymore, grandpa

Image not available

266x199

asn.gif

Anonymous No. 16087766

>>16087754
I wish it could be simplified so much every pajeet code monkey could be at the same level of those jews, so they would commit suicide en mass.

Anonymous No. 16087769

>>16087505
The numbers are defined so that they look like "1" and "2"
" | " is represented by the number 1
" | | " are represented by the number 2
So they are what they are by definition
It doesn't matter if we call number 1 -> 8 instead and number 2 -> 5
8 + 8 would still be 5 if we did

Anonymous No. 16087925

>>16087504
Bertrand Russell and Whitehead weren’t jews

Anonymous No. 16087969

>>16087925
Russell is the ur-redditor.

Anonymous No. 16087989

>>16087504
Why hate on the Peano axioms

Anonymous No. 16088001

>>16087504
this post is fucking retarded and antisemitic! bump cuz it rings and its funny though

Image not available

454x700

deutsche_physik.jpg

Anonymous No. 16088028

>>16087504
anti-semitism is just retards hating jews for their intellect.

Anonymous No. 16088034

By what definition? Define 1, +, =, and 2. Also show the meaning generated by that particular order or else define what orders create what meaning. 1+1=2 could mean "enemy" for all I know.

Anonymous No. 16088055

>>16087558
>Set theoretic mathematics is just so much more powerful,
It isn't. It's completely meaningless, useless and nothing more than a few key academics who wanted to increase their income and government grants by bamboozling everyone with another fictitious branch of mathematics.
>>16087754
>Made obsolete by category theory
Another completely useless scam academic theory.
>>16088028
>anti-semitism is just retards hating jews for their intellect.
No, it's actually Jewish retards telling the Gentiles that they suck hundreds of times in the Talmud in an easy to search format.

MISHNA: One may not keep an animal in the inns [befundekaot] of gentiles because they are suspected of bestiality. Since even gentiles are prohibited from engaging in bestiality, a Jew who places his animal there is guilty of violating the prohibition: “You shall not put a stumbling block before the blind” (Leviticus 19:14). And a woman may not seclude herself with gentiles because they are suspected of engaging in forbidden sexual relations. And any person may not seclude himself with gentiles because they are suspected of bloodshed.
https://www.sefaria.org/Avodah_Zarah.22a.11?lang=bi

Anonymous No. 16088065

>>16087505
You are the definition of a faggot

Anonymous No. 16088067

>>16088055
>I became a rabid genocidal animal and got a bunch of neo-nazi tattoos because of these out of context quotes from a 1500 year old religious compilation I have no deeper understanding of
>I am not a retard or a schizo
I bet a lot of intelligent discussion about mathematical foundations takes place at your GDL and NSM rallies...

Anonymous No. 16088073

>>16088067
>>I became a rabid genocidal animal and got a bunch of neo-nazi tattoos because of these out of context quotes from a 1500 year old religious compilation I have no deeper understanding of
>>I am not a retard or a schizo
>I bet a lot of intelligent discussion about mathematical foundations takes place at your GDL and NSM rallies...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talmud
The Talmud (/ˈtɑːlmʊd, -məd, ˈtæl-/; Hebrew: תַּלְמוּד, romanized: Talmūḏ, lit.'teaching') is the central text of Rabbinic Judaism and the primary source of Jewish religious law (halakha) and Jewish theology.

Anonymous No. 16088076

>>16088067
>>16088067
>>I became a rabid genocidal animal and got a bunch of neo-nazi tattoos because
Your religious book literally hates gentiles and compares them to animals anon.
Maybe you should stop being a racist prick.
It's literally the Jewish Mein Kampf.
And it's your religion.
You might want to grow up a bit and keep your privilege in check.

Anonymous No. 16088081

>>16088073
>>16088076
You can't even name 3 rabbis of the talmud...

Anonymous No. 16088090

>>16088081
>You can't even name 3 rabbis of the talmud...
You mean four.

Anonymous No. 16088095

>>16088081
The four main ones are
Akiva, Yehudah ha-Nasi, Abba Arikha, and Shmuel of Nehardea

Anonymous No. 16088100

>>16087760
Neither Borel nor Lebesgue were Jewish. They were blonde Frenchmen and they developed the modern theory of integration based on set measurability.
Caratheodory was also a non-Jewish Greek scholar with olive green eyes.

The major contributors to Russian set theoretic probability and measure (Luzin, Kolmogorov, were also not Jewish.

I think you just don't understand what modern set theoretic math actually is.

Anonymous No. 16088121

>>16087727
Define d

Image not available

800x500

esl thread.gif

Anonymous No. 16088122

>>16087504
>Why modern mathematics is like this?

Anonymous No. 16088126

>>16088122
Literally nothing in this thread indicates
"English Second Language" anon.

Anonymous No. 16088151

>>16087514
Where do I get this ordinary definition of one? From Frege?

Anonymous No. 16088215

>>16088121
It's what you give her.

Anonymous No. 16088739

>>16088151
The ordinary language notion of one is a semantic primitive. Look up semantic primitives to learn more about them.

Anonymous No. 16088880

>>16088151
>Where do I get this ordinary definition of one? From Frege?
Almost any calculus/analysis textbook would suffice. Maybe some rigorous precalculus textbook.