🧵 Room Temperature Superconductor Update
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 03:11:10 UTC No. 16087532
China Room Temperature Superconductor Researcher Had Experiments to Refute Critics
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2024/
>Chinese researchers are making variations of LK99 room temperature superconductor materials with more sulfur and copper in the chemistry. They are publishing results with stronger magnetic indications of a Meissner effect. The chinese researchers have been online discussing their room temperature superconducting research and the challenges of the materials. Here are the issues discussed. The current of their material is too small, it is almost impossible to stabilize it.
>What kind of sample this is? It's just a pile of powder, simply pressed into pieces with a mold, and broken into pieces with just a light break. Mr. Guan didn't even dare to touch the silver glue, so he simply pressed a few pieces of indium wire and started testing. Under these experimental conditions, the conductivity is close to that of ordinary graphite, which is shocking in itself.
>To make a good conductive film in industry, it has to be repeatedly purified, polished and flattened. Mr Dai now soaks it in water, takes it out and presses it and then measures it. There is not even a tempering and sintering process. They designed this specifically for a one-dimensional system but the my one-dimensional theory is almost ruined.
Also why the fuck does it take 300 seconds to make a thread now. What purpose does this serve?
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 04:05:02 UTC No. 16087563
>>16087532
Retard here, so you’re saying the Chinese refuted the critics? Could we be back?
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 04:10:52 UTC No. 16087569
>>16087563
bro you'll be old and gray and this shit will still be unclear
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 04:19:06 UTC No. 16087574
It's a bit strange that the people developing the technology and who understand the technology more than anyone don't know if the technology is actually working or not before announcing it publicly. Like how many times can you forget to check it's actually working before telling everyone. It's so retarded it seems like something I'd do really, and I'm very retarded
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:12:09 UTC No. 16088171
>>16087574
Well 75% of scientists are huge fucking nerds, and I think we of all people should know how much fucking nerds want to talk about whatever new interesting thing they've just gotten into. So them repeatedly bursting out before they've fully confirmed it doesn't surprise me. Sadly this sometimes makes the overexcited autists and the grifters hard to tell apart sometimes. The ones working on this new superconductor variant don't seem to be asking for money, so I'm inclined to think they're the overexcited autist type. Which doesn't mean they're right, but still. I'm an optimist.
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 16:37:38 UTC No. 16088274
What the fuck happened with the study on global rmsc on graphite?
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 16:43:37 UTC No. 16088283
>>16087532
this may surprise you, but sometimes Chinese scientist lie. their first paper was full of procedural inconsistencies. their conclusion didn't fit the data. even with the refutation no other scientist has been able to replicate their results, and i know of scientist in at least four countries that have tried.
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 20:11:20 UTC No. 16088500
>>16087532
POST-SCARCITY IS A MEME KEEP COPING
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 23:04:51 UTC No. 16088780
>>16088274
>global rmsc on graphite
What is this?
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 23:19:50 UTC No. 16088794
>>16087532
Where is the shared SAMPLE???
Notice they NEVER have a sample for independent Western laboratories.
100% bullshit!
Anonymous at Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:44:24 UTC No. 16090058
>>16087532
>https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2024
>To make a good conductive film in industry, it has to be repeatedly purified, polished and flattened.
What??
Anonymous at Thu, 21 Mar 2024 22:16:01 UTC No. 16090127
>>16087532
I know nothing about superconductors but lemme make a WILD GUESS and say this is bullshit
> Chinese
> literally no theoretical mechanism for how this could work
> already so much bullshit and shadiness
> Chinese
> "oh yeah it's.... it just has to touch the surface but... it's LE PARTIAL LEVITATION"
Shut the fuck up. Anybody who still pays attention to this is a retard
Anonymous at Thu, 21 Mar 2024 22:19:16 UTC No. 16090137
>>16090127
>> Chinese
This started as a Korean project, published too early because one dude broke the secrecy.
>> literally no theoretical mechanism for how this could work
High Tc superconductivity exists (see YBCO) but the detailed theoretical framework is incomplete. A Western group published some theoretical analysis that stated this could be plausible.
>> already so much bullshit and shadiness
If this works, it could be curtains for Intel and AMD.
Anonymous at Thu, 21 Mar 2024 22:25:54 UTC No. 16090153
>>16090137
Cope. 2023 meme of the year.
Anonymous at Thu, 21 Mar 2024 23:02:56 UTC No. 16090228
>>16090137
>This started as a Korean project
Yeah and ended as soon as it became clear it's BS. The only reason it's lead by Chinese now is because it's a clown country with shit science
> could be plausible
>> EATING BELL PEPPERS COULD PLAUSIBLY CURE CANCER
Gtfo with this pop sci slop
> If this works, it could be curtains for Intel and AMD.
>> Le BIG IF TRUE
Too bad it doesn't huh
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:51:45 UTC No. 16091092
>>16090228
>Yeah and ended as soon as it became clear it's BS.
>What is secrecy
>What is backpedaling
You've never heard about national security directives?
I swear to God, you STEM diversity hire tier faggots are so easily swayed by the chinese manipulations no wonder most of you are considered low hanging fruit for them.
LLNL confirmed Korean results then promptly went radio silent. If you haven't noticed, we've had a bunch of wumao shills all over this topic because those thieving faggots were seething with jealousy and are now trying to steal someone else's project.
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:03:56 UTC No. 16091107
>>16087574
>>16088171
There is definitely a political angle involved in LK99 business. It's world changing stuff in terms of increase in power throughput alone.
Others are putting pressure on incumbent Korean administration and controlling interests due to geopolitical war going on, and some want to rush headalong with propagating the latest technological breakthrough, while others want it to be tightly guarded.
Chinese sense an opportunity like termites and are jumping on the issue to present themselves as a solution, while trying to change the trends in their favor.
All in all, it's just a bunch of millenials and Gen X idiots being entitled faggots while their country burns down around them.
Anonymous at Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:15:21 UTC No. 16091129
>>16087532
>China
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Mar 2024 07:49:19 UTC No. 16092263
>>16087532
Nobody cares about this anymore it was clearly fake. CLEARLY fake
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Mar 2024 09:18:14 UTC No. 16092318
>>16087532
> no phase change diagram
its bullshit
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Mar 2024 02:30:11 UTC No. 16093575
>>16091092
As a non science person, why tf would anyone bother publishing a paper if it did work? Wouldnt you keep it to your own country and profit off of the manufacturing process? I sure as hell wouldnt tell the whole world if i found something good
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Mar 2024 02:41:18 UTC No. 16093584
>>16093575
>I sure as hell wouldnt tell the whole world if i found something good
they really didn't tell the world, it was their secret.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Mar 2024 02:53:04 UTC No. 16093597
>>16087532
What we learned (or rather, empirically confirmed)
>Koreans are all frauds
>Chinese lie for headlines
>Schizotards are always wrong and always spam
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Mar 2024 02:55:58 UTC No. 16093601
>>16091092
>>16093575
>>16093584
Is this the mother of all copes?
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Mar 2024 02:58:09 UTC No. 16093605
>>16093575
The thing is you can drag along suckers for YEARS getting financial support if you APPEAR to be regular scientists and SAY you are going to publish papers and present findings.
NOTICE that NO samples have been provided for independent verification...
See "Cold Fusion"
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:02:27 UTC No. 16093609
>>16093601
they literally didn't tell the world. one team member went rogue and leaked everything in the hopes of getting a Nobel. inventor didn't want the world to know. at least that's what was said by them.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:50:17 UTC No. 16094383
>>16093575
This.
It's the same reason why fusion kept being pushed back decade after decade.