Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:14:07 UTC No. 16087736

>>16087664
Newton is more attractive than Leibniz therefore Newton is better

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:32:07 UTC No. 16087752

>>16087664
>here
So I'm assuming you mean the portraits? I see one man with absolutely FABULOUS hair, and one man too autistic to even look at the painter.

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:31:57 UTC No. 16087929

>>16087664
Newton was an asshole

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 13:28:48 UTC No. 16088056

>>16087664
Newton was first and (later) used limits instead of infinitesimals to make the theory more logically sound than the original iterations.

Leibniz just happened to pick a notation that people liked better and never evolved past infinitesimals.

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Mar 2024 17:05:56 UTC No. 16088313

>>16087664
their barbers

Anonymous at Thu, 21 Mar 2024 05:56:13 UTC No. 16089101

>>16088056
Philosophybros, not like this...