Image not available

800x639

HarukoVespa.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16091897

What if Relativity comes from the past (Distance/speed of light) while Quantum Mechanics comes from the future (entanglement)?

Anonymous No. 16092865

So "Now" would be when Relativity meets Quantum Mechanics.

Image not available

1000x750

you.jpg

Anonymous No. 16092890

>>16091897

Anonymous No. 16092891

>>16092890
Accusation without evidence is a confession.

Image not available

676x800

yan.gif

Anonymous No. 16093999

>>16091897

Anonymous No. 16094640

>>16093999
Pilot wave theory, man. The idea of QM being shaped into the future is already there. What if we just take the next step?

Anonymous No. 16094660

>>16091897
Reminds me of the transactional interpretation of QM which is. ... bullshit.

Anonymous No. 16094699

>>16094660
Look, I'm just trying to find some interpretation that gets out of many worlds. Copenhagen is too basic, pilot wave seems beyond convenient. Everything seems to be boiling down to many worlds.

Anonymous No. 16094708

>>16094699
Many worlds blatantly disregards the only computational tool of QM, namely the Born rule. Literally the only appeal of many worlds is the cartoonish pop soi fantasies it induces in some of its readers.

Anonymous No. 16094712

>>16094708
Is life not a cartoonish pop soi aesthetic all the time?

Anonymous No. 16094716

>>16094712
My life isn't. My life is a sad hell of despair, isolation and persecution.

Anonymous No. 16094767

>>16094708
LMAO, no it doesn't disregard anything, you are just clueless.

Anonymous No. 16094769

>>16094699
Take a look at the relational interpretation of quantum mechanics.

Anonymous No. 16094779

>>16094769
Isn't that kind of like 'You're Schrodingers' cat. You always look at the nuclear bomb and because you are always looking at the nuclear bomb it never goes off, because if it did you would stop looking at it?'

Anonymous No. 16094786

>>16094640
LMAO, all local hidden variable models are dead and buried under 15+ sigmas.

Anonymous No. 16094792

>>16094786
Right so how about there is an entanglement in the future and you in the present are part of it?