🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Mar 2024 09:58:27 UTC No. 16092346
Is ionic silver a scam compared to true colloidal silver? Manufacturers of ionic silver claim that smaller particles are better for absorption, while proponents of true colloidal silver argue that the clear solution is essentially a rip-off. What are your thoughts?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:01:01 UTC No. 16092348
if you're so picky about what form your silver takes then why don't you just make your own electrolytic cell and produce it in whatever oxidation state and particle size you want
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:13:52 UTC No. 16092354
>>16092348
I do want to make it myself, but I'm interested the opinions or conclusions of people who are smart enough on the matter. Google seems to have little to offer
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:54:19 UTC No. 16092613
>>16092346
Both are garbage. Obviously ions will have more chemical interactions then an insoluble form of silver and therefore you will take up more of the silver ions, but who cares? Silver doesn't do anything for you.
You should start by finding a bunch of studies about taking colloidal and ionic silver as a health supplement or home remedy. Don't read just one, try to find dozens. When you find that the majority of them say "inconclusive" or "no measurable effect was found" or similar, then you will know that it's a money pit like homeopathic medicine.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:01:12 UTC No. 16092680
>>16092613
Science can only be critiqued from within its institution. You are a dangerous antivaxxer.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:33:40 UTC No. 16092803
>>16092346
>What is argyria?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:57:05 UTC No. 16092837
Is /sci/ just a pit of troons that will never be real women?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Mar 2024 21:21:41 UTC No. 16093195
Every answer to is x better than y? is always depends on the situation. If one was better, everyone would use that.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Mar 2024 21:22:24 UTC No. 16093197
>>16093195
The better one
SHAGV