🧵 I just realized
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 12:13:35 UTC No. 16095830
The time slowdown at high energies (something moving fast or with a very high mass) is due to the refresh rate of the universe slowing down locally due to having to do much more processing for high energy objects.
Like in a game where the physics engine is tied to the refresh rate that starts lagging when there’s a ton of stuff on screen to process. We are literally in a computer that uses multiple CPUs.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 12:27:28 UTC No. 16095845
Prove it.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 12:45:36 UTC No. 16095859
>>16095830
damn, that's another argument for simulation theory
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 13:15:03 UTC No. 16095890
>>16095830
Not really. Time dilation emerges from geometry and the fact we can't tell the speed of light in only one way, only double way.
Make a visualization that reflects experimental data, and the time it takes for the signal to do the two-way travel grows exactly with the time dilation factor. Note that you also need to apply length contraction to get the same results as those given by experimental data. To make it really easy use an inertial frame of reference where all the signals can be drawn as stationary spheres growing at the same rate.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 13:46:00 UTC No. 16095934
>>16095890
Uhm no,
> speed of light is a constant
yes, but why is it 3x10^8 m/s and not something higher? or even at "infinite speed"
you're an absolute retard can't even consider this. We all know time dilation don't explain it materialistically like scientific puppet, devoid of spirit. this is metaphysical dumbass
> t. someone who actually took a course on special relativity and introduction to general relativity
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:06:08 UTC No. 16095954
>>16095934
>yes, but why is it 3x10^8 m/s and not something higher? or even at "infinite speed"
Because c = 1/sqrt(epsilon0 * mu0). This is basic electromagnetism, kid. Don't brag about taking physics classes when you didn't understand them.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:16:30 UTC No. 16095963
>>16095954
>Because c = 1/sqrt(epsilon0 * mu0)
idiot, explaining materialistic empirical data. again, he is asking metaphysics dumbass
> don't brag about taking physic -ACK
t. i got an A in both classes, i also took EM A in that too
you're the perfect example of a scientific fact puppet. You don't think for yourself but rather expound what some other schizo has come up with in their free time of actually thinking and exploring and feeling superior because of it.
you're the materialistic bourgeouise karl marx wanted us, real creative laborers, to kill of the face of earth for polluting it's paradisal air.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:17:44 UTC No. 16095965
>>16095954
t. fuck you
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:47:04 UTC No. 16096011
>>16095963
>materialistic empirical
Blatantly false. EM, SR, GR, even classical mechanics - they were all invented a priori. Physicists much smarter than you came up with models how physical objects ought to behave in their mind. Only much later came the empirical testing confirming their models. You have a highschool understanding of the scientific method at best, kid.
>scientific fact puppet
Funny projection coming from the clown who brags about taking undergrad intro classes.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:51:10 UTC No. 16096017
>>16096011
>You have a highschool understanding of the scientific method at best, kid.
i can't take you seriously. you sound like a middle school plumber drop out, red neck 30-year old pedo, and self-educated with youtube videos.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:57:36 UTC No. 16096127
>>16096017
You seem to have a talent for making up bizarre strawmen instead of talking about physics (which you seem to know nothing about). Have you considered joining reddit?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:04:02 UTC No. 16096136
>>16096017
>plumbers le bad
>red necks le bad
>educating yourself online le bad
Behold, the anti working class sentiment of the modern soi ackadummic who can't unclog his own toilet and whose "education" doesn't allow him to know his own gender.