๐งต Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:42:52 UTC No. 16096002
Can good body compensate for a bad face?
What does research say about this?
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:47:42 UTC No. 16096013
>big milkers
ew. still would.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:14:06 UTC No. 16096064
>>16096002
I agree she has a bad face and good body. I think the face tells you something about what's inside the brain and that it's a two way system. You learn what people who look a certain way have in them and your attraction system changes to find certain faces attractive.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:28:06 UTC No. 16096173
>>16096002
>Can good body compensate for a bad face?
No, because the face makes 80% of your attractiveness. We spend much more time looking at faces than we spend looking at (naked) bodies. It's the other way around, a good face can compensate for a bad body.
Also the woman you posted doesn't have a bad face, just a generic, slightly boring one.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:23:12 UTC No. 16096302
>>16096173
>No, because the face makes 80% of your attractiveness.
I dunno, charisma is probably the most important thing. You can look like a retard, but if you move and behave like someone who's legit sure of themselves...that's better than just a nice face.
I have a pretty nice face btw.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:27:51 UTC No. 16096313
>>16096064
>she has a bad face
I see nothing wrong.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:32:18 UTC No. 16096319
In case of men:
Yes. Being tall is more important than having a nice face. A 6'4 guy with a deformed face will always mog a 5'9 manlet with a flawless face.
In case of women:
Doesn't matter. Every woman is inherently desirable due to her holes. The ugliest women with ugly faces and ugly bodies will still get to choose between hundreds of simps.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:35:36 UTC No. 16096329
>>16096319
>. A 6'4 guy with a deformed face will always mog a 5'9 manlet with a flawless face.
6'4" is just at the threshold of being too tall.
I'm just 6'1", I guess 6`2" is about ideal.
In any case, the 5'9" perfect face totally wins out over 6'4" deformed.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:14:00 UTC No. 16096416
>>16096319
>Being tall is more important than having a nice face.
Absolutely wrong, if you're tall and ugly you're just viewed as a creep.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:19:09 UTC No. 16096423
>>16096313
Because you're used to white girls.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:21:52 UTC No. 16096430
>>16096423
Thank god.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:22:28 UTC No. 16096432
>>16096423
>Because you're used to white girls.
What? She's 6 on a good day.
NTA...
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:23:42 UTC No. 16096436
>>16096430
No. You're ignorant.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:24:38 UTC No. 16096439
>>16096002
she's a perfectly acceptable 6. tits too big for my tastes but nevertheless rawdoggable
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:25:01 UTC No. 16096440
>>16096436
Cope and seethe, darkie
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:26:48 UTC No. 16096445
>>16096440
>Retard thinks I'm dark, also can't use non-degenerate language.
How surprising.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:29:19 UTC No. 16096448
>>16096445
>Darkie reels when called what it is
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:32:19 UTC No. 16096452
>>16096448
In your dreams.
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:41:24 UTC No. 16096468
>>16096013
lol
Anonymous at Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:57:53 UTC No. 16096504
This thread was moved to >>>/b/915900354