Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 13:18:27 UTC No. 16097643

There is no layer of hell too deep for people who deliberately peddle mathematical falsehoods.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 13:20:28 UTC No. 16097646

>a bunch of symbols normies don't understand
Man this guy must be a genius

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 13:40:09 UTC No. 16097654

Infinity does not exist. If you rip out the infinity from 1+2+3+... you are left with -1/12, which does exist.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:07:12 UTC No. 16097673

He should be more explicit in how he gets from Line #1 to Line #2.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:13:30 UTC No. 16097678

>plus infinity
damn

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:15:44 UTC No. 16097680

I honestly hope this is bait. I know this guy is a pop-math midwit, but jesus christ this is bad.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:28:41 UTC No. 16097702

>>16097636
>>16097680
Math retard here. Can you guys explain the (shit) joke/reference he's making?

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:31:02 UTC No. 16097704

>>16097702
If there's a joke I don't get it. Unless the joke is how absurd the attempted proof is and was presented as satire.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:31:48 UTC No. 16097708

>>16097702
there is no joke. it's just the card says the sum of the naturals is -1/12.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:32:49 UTC No. 16097709

>>16097708
sorry, the sum of the naturals plus infinity.

B4rk0n at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:36:23 UTC No. 16097714

>>16097708
>>16097709
>>16097702
>Same mad fag

OP proves what he is saying logically and has written it clearly to you.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:41:03 UTC No. 16097716

>>16097714
Would you care to summarize his proof in your own words? I would enjoy watching you pretend to understand what's happening on the first line.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:41:28 UTC No. 16097717

>>16097636
That is a very british smile

B4rk0n at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:43:55 UTC No. 16097720

>>16097717
>>16097716
Meds. Now.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:45:25 UTC No. 16097721

>>16097720
>evades question
Your concession is accepted.

B4rk0n at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:47:48 UTC No. 16097725

>>16097721
Retard kek

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:14:06 UTC No. 16098042

>>16097636
> third line
> finite number plus +infinity = negative finite number
Literally false by definition. Any finite number + +infinity is +infinity.
Everything else is correct.
Sloppy writing I assume, should just be
> 1+ 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + .... = -1/12

/thread

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:41:24 UTC No. 16098078

>>16098042
It's not false exactly, it's better to say any statement with "+ Infinity" is meaningless.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:42:19 UTC No. 16098081

You can't help but feel that the English are a subspecies

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:44:12 UTC No. 16098085

>>16098078
> It's not false exactly
It is, by definition.

> it's better to say any statement with "+ Infinity" is meaningless.
No, it's defined.

> hurr but it's not... LE INTUITIVE
too bad bucko

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:46:02 UTC No. 16098090

>>16098085
>No, it's defined.
addition isn't defined for infinity
try again

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:47:15 UTC No. 16098093

>>16097636
These paradoxes are literally caused by dividing by zero, which is what all infinities are.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:50:02 UTC No. 16098098

S=1-1+1-1+...
S=1-S
2S=1
S=1/2

Can you spot the mistake?

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:51:58 UTC No. 16098102

>>16097702
here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beakj767uG4

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:52:59 UTC No. 16098103

>>16098098
there ain't none

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:59:05 UTC No. 16098107

>>16098098
Yeah, you tried to manipulate an infinite sequence in an undefined manner.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 20:01:33 UTC No. 16098111

>>16098098
You can't assign a non-convergent series to a variable then attempt to treat it like a real number. All the results you get afterwards will be nonsensical.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 20:29:28 UTC No. 16098159

>>16098098
S=0+0+0+...
S=1-0
Somewhere there i suppose

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 22:09:28 UTC No. 16098282

>>16097636
Debunked.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuIIjLr6vUA

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 22:31:12 UTC No. 16098316

I hope these people have anvils dropped on their heads for encouraging redditors to get math degrees. I really didn't need that.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 12:03:23 UTC No. 16099216

>>16098111
>All the results you get afterwards will be nonsensical.
No necessarily.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:36:28 UTC No. 16099364

>>16099216
Just in the sense that broken clock is accurate twice a day.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:00:22 UTC No. 16099389

>>16099364
not clocks that run on unix time

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:20:54 UTC No. 16099409

>>16098159
do you… understand the algebra of that part?

reverend Bartholomew at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 17:20:15 UTC No. 16099546

>>16097636

1/12 represents jesus and his disciples

sum of integers is rest of the humanity

accept the holy word

repent

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 19:20:50 UTC No. 16099740

>>16098282
>bald
>german
you have my attention

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 07:47:08 UTC No. 16100799

>>16098282
>old vid, meaning he's unaware of the new developments brought up in >>16098102
*yawn*

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 07:49:04 UTC No. 16100801

>>16100799
**but i do agree that mathologer is very good**

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 07:54:07 UTC No. 16100805

>>16100801
[spoiler]but i do agree that mathologer is very good, and within the knowledge he had at the time, it is a very good video[/spoiler]

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:10:01 UTC No. 16100830

>>16098102
illogical nonsense math's equivalent to baffle gab

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:29:45 UTC No. 16100853

>>16100830
ah yes, the classic poof by "nuh-uh" rebuttal, how lovely and eloquent

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:33:39 UTC No. 16100956

>>16100799
>if we change the equation then the answer also changes
wow, truly genius, I see that mcdonalds degree is paying off well

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:45:59 UTC No. 16100963

>>16097636
That's not a proof, just various notations for the same thing.

Now bag my fucking groceries.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 11:20:35 UTC No. 16101001

>>16098098
What mistake?
S is either 0 or 1, so 1/2 makes sense

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:13:52 UTC No. 16101057

>>16098282
So wait, is he saying that the famous Indian mathematician, Srinivasa Ramanujan, was a scammer?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramanujan_summation

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:37:58 UTC No. 16101094

>>16101057
>if we just put a - in front of it it becomes negative
Yes, we know, that doesn't mean adding infinite positive integers will result in -1/12

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:51:31 UTC No. 16101199

>>16101094
How could it be that they published that schizophrenia of playing around with infinitites and I cannot publish my thing. And nobody dares to confess that they don't have my peers to peer-review it!

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 04:06:48 UTC No. 16102673

>>16101199
Your schizophrenia is cringe, whereas Ramanujan's was based.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 04:36:00 UTC No. 16102706

>>16102673
i concur with this anon, there is a reason that one goddess revealed that shit to 'ol ramalamadingdong, and not your schizo ass

🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 07:16:06 UTC No. 16102922

>>16102673
I suspect that his useless crap was published by the analogue of antifa of that time, we should read Hardy's diaries to see if he was opposing colonialism and wanted to show that indians are not savages, so he published what nobody could understand the same way nobody can understand quantum physics, so they have to take kikes seriously, as if they were not retarded schizos with disgusting archaic beliefs (and I'm speaking not of gods and goddesses, but about pedophilia and shit)
And I don't even mind his mindfucks being published, they're not worse than the most of what they print. I just wonder why it is next to impossible to publish something outside of common narratives thes days. But then Ramanujan's story gives me the answer: I need a handler who can handle all the academic standards, to make my work boring as fuck so that nobody notices it as much and doesn't get envy or something. That goddess I honor her as well.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 07:21:33 UTC No. 16102925

>>16097646
he publishes around mod gravity

🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 07:43:45 UTC No. 16102947

>>16102673
I suspect that his useless crap was published by the analogue of antifa of that time, we should read Hardy's diaries to see if he was opposing colonialism and wanted to show that indians are not savages, so he published what nobody could understand the same way nobody can understand quantum physics, so they have to take kikes seriously, as if they were not retarded schizos with disgusting archaic beliefs (and I'm speaking not of gods and goddesses, but about pedophilia and shit)
And I don't even mind his mindfucks being published, they're not worse than the most of what they print. I just wonder why it is next to impossible to publish something outside of common narratives thes days. But then Ramanujan's story gives me the answer: I need a handler who can handle all the academic standards, to make my work boring as fuck so that nobody notices it as much and doesn't get envy or something. That green goddess I revere as well, so maybe I should add that Ramanujan's equations taught us about working with infinities, first steps, even if I find them clumsy, it's obviously only my opinion, may they all bloom and modify as immaterial living thinks (but then books and discs and brains are their bodies)

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 08:55:27 UTC No. 16103014

>>16097636
Nice coloring.
Let's see Paul Allen's card.

Anonymous at Sat, 30 Mar 2024 07:56:23 UTC No. 16104524

>>16097643
fpbp

Anonymous at Sat, 30 Mar 2024 08:03:16 UTC No. 16104530

>>16098098
>resorting a not absolutely convergent series

Anonymous at Sat, 30 Mar 2024 08:20:39 UTC No. 16104546

>>16104530
yes, but that's just like the cherry on top of an entire shit cake.

Anonymous at Sat, 30 Mar 2024 08:34:02 UTC No. 16104551

>>16104546
Fag