Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 21:55:12 UTC No. 16098264

>>16098262
when you really look at it closely most of the universe is bullshit anon.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 21:55:36 UTC No. 16098266

>>16098262
>Prove me wrong.
I can't

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 21:55:43 UTC No. 16098267

>Electrons are bullshit

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 21:56:51 UTC No. 16098269

>>16098267
it's bullshit all the way down.
and all the way up.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 22:49:13 UTC No. 16098350

>>16098267
>>16098269
Electrons are real though. You can have an electron beam and generate nice little x-ray. You can confirm it's an electric beam by measuring mass/charge etc

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 23:01:19 UTC No. 16098380

>>16098264
>>16098269
The Atom is not bullshit. Quarks are bullshit.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 23:03:40 UTC No. 16098385

>>16098262
deep inelastic scattering. the data is pretty obvious that there are point-like constituents in protons and neutrons. similar observations to how rutherford proved atoms have small nuclei.

usually before calling a scientific theory “bullshit” it is good practice to propose another theory to explain the data (or else to question the validity of the data.) do you have a different proposal that explains deep inelastic scattering data?

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 23:04:08 UTC No. 16098387

Quarks aren't bullshit. Prove me wrong.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 23:04:36 UTC No. 16098391

>>16098262
the discovery of quarks has led to ZERO technological advancement
their existence is just in theory

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Mar 2024 23:34:56 UTC No. 16098453

>>16098350
Electrons are quarks.
>You can confirm it's an electric beam by measuring mass/charge etc
>Light isn't real

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:31:25 UTC No. 16098523

>>16098262
Molecules are bullshit

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:35:09 UTC No. 16098532

>>16098391
just because one can’t (currently) use the quark theory to make a profit doesn’t mean it’s wrong. nobody is making a profit on the theory of dark matter explaining the rotation curve of galaxies. the theory just explains something better than any other theory so that wins in the realm of ideas. it is actually good that there exists a realm of reality where we can study things without any potential profits. it gives us a nice clean and pure realm of nature to discover and study without money causing there to be a hovering cloud of clownworld people

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:01:28 UTC No. 16098642

>>16098385
Can I say god did it?

Cult of Passion at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:10:34 UTC No. 16098651

>>16098262
A wierd tri-point of reality. Curious as to what force to apply to it to make it do what I dream of.

I havnt really heard anything, but I havnt been looking for it either. Maybe the things we calls stuff makes us not see it in other ways...

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:11:14 UTC No. 16098652

>>16098532
>nobody is making a profit on the theory of dark matter explaining the rotation curve of galaxies

oy vey we need to build a trillion dollar telescope to look for dark matter!!!

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:30:01 UTC No. 16098682

>>16098262

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:31:24 UTC No. 16098684

>>16098385
Tldr

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:32:25 UTC No. 16098686

>>16098651
You're a rectumangle

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 02:32:37 UTC No. 16098688

>>16098262
so it just stops at atoms? nothin else?

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 09:29:12 UTC No. 16099092

>>16098453
>Phlogiston is bullshit
>hurr dat mean u think fire be bullshit

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 09:33:40 UTC No. 16099093

>>16098267
bros somebody better explain wtf fractional charge is
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00832-z

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 10:28:17 UTC No. 16099146

>>16099093
Turns out that not everything is a multiple of some random particle's value for some property. Wow. Such contraversy!

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:49:51 UTC No. 16099377

>>16098453
Electrons, and leptons in general, aren't affected by the Strong force.
Quarks very much are.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:16:01 UTC No. 16099399

All subatomic particles are ephemeral points of contact between representatin theory and 'reality'.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:54:42 UTC No. 16099435

I cannot. They truly are bullshit. Probably just spin xyz directions

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:25:42 UTC No. 16099478

>>16098652
Those telescopes are already being built to spy on you.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KH-11_KENNEN
A few others pointed away from Earth is the least they can do.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 20:43:18 UTC No. 16099914

>>16098262
Quarks are epicycles.
The first quark model was invented by Heisenberg, in his time there were only two quarks, up and down quarks, and they were to be akin to the electron spin states up and down. He called this Isospin, it had the same mathematics of spin.
Combinations of two quarks allowed for an explanation of neutrons, protons and pions.
So 5 particles were explained as a combination of only 2 particles, it was a good model.
It failed to explain other particles like Kaons, which was strange so a new quark was invented called Strange quark. This was done by Gell-Man.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 20:53:05 UTC No. 16099944

>>16098391
Particle physics will eventually lead to a giant payoff after the chiral anomaly gets better understood, as it will lead to breaking baryon number conservation. Its theorized that a fusion-like reactor running at 2 Terakelvin can achieve total mass to energy conversion.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:27:53 UTC No. 16100847

Atoms are bullshit. Everything is made of aether densities, and gravity is actually due to the flow of aether particles to greater aether densities. For Earth, the flow velocity is 9.8 m/s^2.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:44:25 UTC No. 16101105

>>16100847
>velocity
>uses units for acceleration.
Opinion discarded.
Come back when you get your GED you nigger.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:16:45 UTC No. 16101828

only quark theory i sort of get is the eightfold way, which only uses 3 quarks, i think it was improved with the idea of "flavor symmetry" and later with "color symmetry".