Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 04:44:13 UTC No. 16100577

creating rather than solving inequalities

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 07:37:02 UTC No. 16100787

>>16100098
communism, no joke

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 09:39:22 UTC No. 16100904

>>16100787
did the USSR have a lysenkoism version of mathematics?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 11:09:14 UTC No. 16100988

blacks and spics cant into math so leftoids fudge the data to make it look like their commie way of doing things is the correct way, when actually its even stupider

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 11:11:31 UTC No. 16100990

>>16100098
>What is "equity based algebra"?
2+2=4ish

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:40:20 UTC No. 16101100

>>16100098
Mathematics that niggers can understand.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 21:12:33 UTC No. 16101952

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 21:26:53 UTC No. 16101992

>>16100904
I seem to recalll that they actually did. I think I remember a paper called mathematics in the ussr or something like it which talked about it.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 21:27:54 UTC No. 16101996

>>16100988
commies are too retarded to understand so what do you expect?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 21:28:55 UTC No. 16101999

>>16101952
that's just compound interest

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 04:39:38 UTC No. 16102710

>>16100904
>>16101992
the notion of a "lysenkoism version of mathematics" is nonsense. lysenkoism happened because the state put its weight behind an incorrect theory of a phenomenon (in this case, heredity) that was poorly understood at the time. this doesn't really happen in modern math because it's a formal science rather than a physical one. I guess there's the ABC conjecture (considered proven but only in Japan) and some vixra crackpots nobody cares about, but that's it

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 05:07:25 UTC No. 16102745

>>16100098
It says right there in the excerpt of the article you posted a picture of.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 05:23:40 UTC No. 16102765

People ITT know dogshit about alternative math frameworks and it shows. There are multiple knowledgeable critics of frameworks like these, yet none of them are screeching in panic like you are.
The little you know about this topic, if that indeed counts as knowing anything, comes from Neel Kolhatkar's "Modern Education".
0%, and I mean 0%, of the efforts put into developing new mathematical frameworks focus on changing existing math. No one thinks 1 + 1, over the real ring in respect to regular addition, is no longer 2, but instead oestrogen. No one thinks this.
I don't defend alternative math frameworks from regular, serious criticism because I am not a fan of them. But this thread makes me physically cringe.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 06:37:05 UTC No. 16102873

>>16101952
Are you seriously shocked that 9 million people can create 6 million people in 15 years? This has to be bait.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 06:38:33 UTC No. 16102877

>>16102873

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 06:52:48 UTC No. 16102895

>>16102873
Are you talking about the same people who have strong religious rules for reproduction and still only have a population of 15.7M after nearly 100 years?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_population_by_country

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 08:17:11 UTC No. 16102980

>>16102765
>Says what it isn't
>Doesn't say what it is
>As a result, posts the exact level of dogshit as everyone else but also acts smug about doing so
Amazing

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 12:21:57 UTC No. 16103142

>>16102980
Alternative frameworks are literally anything and everything that isn't the incumbent framework. Telling you what it isn't is tell you what it is.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:10:12 UTC No. 16103184

>>16100098
Equity means you get the same outcome. So, if you remove the option to do a "higher" class, the outcome will be equal in that all of the students did the same class. Something like that.

I find why they value equity even if it means bringing others down unclear. I find it hard to figure out what they're saying.