Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 22:24:29 UTC No. 16100101

>Jung
not science or math

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 22:25:23 UTC No. 16100102

>>16100099
you sure do seem to like talking about yourself on social media

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 22:27:10 UTC No. 16100105

>>16100101
Turns out psychiatry is an accepted science.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 22:46:08 UTC No. 16100130

>>16100099
Elektromagnetischefeldtheorie book at my library written by one german guy its thick and its good

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 22:58:38 UTC No. 16100138

>>16100105
Nope, that's far from neurology.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 23:14:48 UTC No. 16100172

>>16100105
>Turns out psychiatry is an accepted science.
Since when?

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Mar 2024 23:51:45 UTC No. 16100236

>>16100130
What's your major?

Anonymous !pjwjmEQ1RM at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:37:15 UTC No. 16100297

>>16100172
Since forever?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:04:32 UTC No. 16101563

>>16100099
Capital: A Critique of Political Economy by Karl Marx

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:06:29 UTC No. 16101565

>>16100297
social science, not natural science. >>>/his/

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:14:42 UTC No. 16101584

>>16101565
>psychiatry uses measurements and follows the scientific method in context of organismal psychopathologies
sounds like a natural science to me, stupid

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:16:42 UTC No. 16101586

>>16100099
Category Theory for Programmers I mostly don't get it. is it over for me?
>>16100102
xir is a woman.
>>16100130
how is it?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:19:17 UTC No. 16101588

>>16101584
why's the replication crisis so severe, then?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:20:56 UTC No. 16101595

>>16101565
???

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:22:42 UTC No. 16101598

>>16101595
psychiatry =/= psychology

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:24:20 UTC No. 16101599

>>16101598
Jung was a psychiatrist, stupid. lmfao you're dumb as fuck.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:12:05 UTC No. 16101686

>>16101598
That's not all that true.The (small in term of headcount I think) subset of psychology that isn't intertwined with psychiatry is better described by marketing research or some other term specific to the task at hand.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:26:48 UTC No. 16101712

>>16100099
I haven't read a book since I was a kid, if that's what you mean by reading. I read a lot online though. If you can convince me that I can learn something efficiently from a book that I can't learn better from watching a YouTube video or something then maybe I'll try it.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:34:41 UTC No. 16101725

>>16101712
I don't really care what you do, so...

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:37:44 UTC No. 16101736

I stopped reading them after noticing the greatest minds arriving at the same conclusions as me. It's but a waste of time seeing all of them agree with me.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:41:43 UTC No. 16101744

>>16101712
What have you learned by watching youtube videos?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:43:03 UTC No. 16101747

>>16101725
But you cared to show that you "don't care". Which implies you're emotional about something. Maybe that you don't have an argument?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:43:39 UTC No. 16101749

>>16101599
Jung was a literal schizophrenic mysticist

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:45:02 UTC No. 16101752

>>16101744
You want me to list all the things I've learned? I've learned languages, skills, facts, et cetera. Why?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:46:58 UTC No. 16101760

>>16100101
>>16100105
math and science need to be divorced
at this point science is as rigorous and effective as couples therapy

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:48:12 UTC No. 16101762

>>16101752
>You want me to list all the things I've learned?
Yes. And what have you done of this knowledge.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:57:20 UTC No. 16101783

>>16101752
You want me to convince you that reading is worthwhile over watching YouTube videos. Why?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:05:17 UTC No. 16101804

>>16101783
Because if I learned something new I'd better myself.
And because I get to practice my stenography writing to you.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:09:56 UTC No. 16101812

>>16101804
But you assumed off the bat that people will care enough to convince you otherwise. Sounds like you have an ego issue.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:15:35 UTC No. 16101822

>>16101812
No. You're reading too much into words. Probably because you're emotional about having no argument still.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:22:58 UTC No. 16101836

>>16101822
>lashes out when called out
Typical egoist damage control

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:27:14 UTC No. 16101845

>>16101836
Good talk. I got a good indication to never read books or associate with book readers.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:28:44 UTC No. 16101847

>>16101845
Okay

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 21:36:01 UTC No. 16102022

>>16100236
EE
>>16101586
book here:
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-19746-8

I like it's didactic approach. I am able to understand most in 2 passes.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 21:38:48 UTC No. 16102031

>>16100099
>Jung

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 21:44:34 UTC No. 16102047

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:43:03 UTC No. 16102151

>>16102031
>No mentioned of psychology of the unconscious
Donkey graphic.