Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:28:10 UTC No. 16101340

>>16101131
>im 136

basically a normie too, i dont see the world in a particularly special way

why do so many people with moderately high iq think they see things differently from those with lower iq

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:46:33 UTC No. 16101362

>>16101131
I'm honestly afraid I'm not breaking 130 even. I could be a fucking midwit

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:55:02 UTC No. 16101373

Ur just an arrogant nerd. Memorized some worthless bits of info like a fuckin computer. Try problem solving an issue irl faster than 99% of people. Bet you can’t.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:55:30 UTC No. 16101376

>>16101340
i don't think they do

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:09:27 UTC No. 16101391

>143
Test is bad. Too easy and many inconsistent answers

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:14:42 UTC No. 16101494

>>16101131
>compared to all of you
If you could lower the IQ of all other people but yours remained the same, would you do it?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:19:28 UTC No. 16101497

>>16101494
if I'd have a choice I'd raise everybody else's up and keep mine the same. way better chances of them pulling me up than not raising their IQs. or even worse, lower then. your chances get even worse.
having better people than you, that you can "go against" is more better than ending up as "the best one". no shit

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:26:19 UTC No. 16101506

>>16101494
Absolutely not. I would raise people IQ to my lv or above me instantly.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:33:41 UTC No. 16101512

>>16101131
>133 IQ
holy midwit

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:35:44 UTC No. 16101518

>>16101494
I'm merely a midwit, but even I get depressed when confronted with the sheer stupidity of the majority. Lowering IQs even further would turn an already shitty world into a hellish one.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:47:00 UTC No. 16101538

>>16101131
>135 here
midwit as well

<90: retard euphoria heaven
90-115: below average
115-130: average/midwit
140+: normie slight smart guy (usable)
170+: olympiad-level
200+: newton level

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:18:45 UTC No. 16101587

>>16101131
it does not matter if you do not succeed.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:43:08 UTC No. 16101748

>>16101131
Why would you make a whole thread about being a midwit? Is this some kind of weird humiliation kink?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:29:02 UTC No. 16101848

How does having IQ >140 feel smartbros? As a midwit I will never know the feeling of such mental prowess

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:32:22 UTC No. 16101853

I hate genius. I hate the idea of genius. I hate geniuses.
Worst of all I hate that I am supposedly one also.
I wish I deserved to live. I wish I had lived.
I am only superior in suffering.
These numbers don't mean anything. They're not valuable. It's just masturbation.
Great men must wander through a world made of fire to work their metal into something of majesty. I cannot help but to feel my own obliteration.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:37:48 UTC No. 16101862

I'm not as intelligent as I think I am. What does that make me?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:38:45 UTC No. 16101864

>>16101862
A science expert

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:39:27 UTC No. 16101866

>>16101864
I am a metaphysicist, so yes.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:40:48 UTC No. 16101871

>>16101862
human.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 21:17:58 UTC No. 16101967

>>16101131
I must say that I have little mathematics and geometry knowledge so my result counts more

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 21:47:42 UTC No. 16102050

>>16101131
>133
Stop making IQ threads retard, but I can't say I'm surprised you did with that IQ.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:04:26 UTC No. 16102084

>>16101131
one time I scored 98, the next 130, should I take the halfway point?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:25:01 UTC No. 16102114

Wait so is the rule for this that if the lines invest then the middle dot changes color?

Or does it not matter if the line are capable of inversion, just as long as they are subjected to the process?

Because a straight line can't be inverted I'm a way that makes difference to the naked eye.

So does the dot stay unfilled because the lines couldn't invert? Or does the dot become purple because even though the straight lines remain straight, they were subjected to the hypothetical "inversion" process?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:31:37 UTC No. 16102131

>>16101131
The test is fake lol.

Random guessing gets you an 85 IQ
Guessing one letter consistently nets you about 75-80.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:40:53 UTC No. 16102146

>>16102131
>dumbass discovers probability

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:51:29 UTC No. 16102169

i always get low results on these tests. i feel like a complete retard, i even got low average on a real IQ test (my real measured IQ averages out to like 103). i cannot think with these tests. i always apply some spatial and physical logic to them and personify the shapes. a part of them "squeezes" the other, inducing transformation, or otherwise acts physically upon the others. other times i have no evidence to assume a correlation between two patterns, for example if the color is inverted on one side but another rule is being applied, why should one assume the colors being inverted isn't totally random? this is what it feels like being low IQ just so you know.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:51:56 UTC No. 16102171

>>16102146
Repeated random guesses on this test consistently yielding a number within 1 standard deviation is a pretty shit test.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 23:27:06 UTC No. 16102234

>>16102169
took a full scale version

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 23:28:28 UTC No. 16102237

>>16102169
If you take a fish out of the water and measure its ability to climb a tree, it will seem stupid

Were you evolved to sit down in a single place and look at a statically dynamic surface and try to figure out things?

Abstract reasoning is well and good but there are a myriad of things that affect survival in this world. Octopi/octopuses are very smart, sometimes they get caught by simple-minded fish that gulp them down.

If you feel bad about your IQ, read up on the theory of multiple intelligences.

What good is a high IQ if your body doesn't work well in tandem with your mind?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 23:40:10 UTC No. 16102263

>>16101131
if you were actually high IQ you'd be depressed at how retarded everyone else is. Nice larp brainlet

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 00:19:36 UTC No. 16102359

>>16102169
I got like a 80 on one I took years ago, so I just tell people I'm in the 80th percentile range. Makes sense though, I did not learn to read until 3rd grade.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 00:25:30 UTC No. 16102371

>>16102114
>Or does it not matter if the line are capable of inversion, just as long as they are subjected to the process?
i feel like theres insufficient information to prove former, that being said i think the latter would be a pretty safe assumption, but its still vague

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 00:27:08 UTC No. 16102374

>>16102371
>iq test
>answers are "vague"
jfl

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 00:39:52 UTC No. 16102389

>>16102374
i guess what i mean is its certainly possible for his first explanation to be correct, but i think it would require more examples.

maybe vauge isnt the right word, i dont really care

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 00:41:00 UTC No. 16102390

>>16102389
i'm not loling at you, i'm laughing at this dogshit test

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 00:42:05 UTC No. 16102395

>>16101494
yes. I can't talk to people anyway. At least then I can become the king of idiots. (instead of merely being one)

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 00:42:44 UTC No. 16102397

>>16102359
Never mind, according to this I R smart now

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 00:44:36 UTC No. 16102403

>>16102359
i used to have a high iq and was put in special classes due to it as a child. now i abuse drugs and i'm constantly sleep deprived. that's what it does to your brain

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 00:45:39 UTC No. 16102405

>>16102169
>dead fucking average iq of 103
>low average
youre not "low average iq", you just place too much value in the opinions of dipshits on 4chan

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 20:35:34 UTC No. 16103715

>>16101131
My brother :)
>>16101373
Awww, monkey :)

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 21:24:02 UTC No. 16103782

>>16101340
And I'm 139. I have a feeling this test is bs, it just starts off at a set value and gives you 3 IQ points for each correct answer.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 21:53:33 UTC No. 16103836

MENSA here I come

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 23:18:36 UTC No. 16103976

>>16101131
IQ isn't general intelligence. Check people's brain and see how well they can think. That's what should be done.