Image not available

800x1199

carbon nightmare.jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ ๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16102790

whats the carbon footprint of a starship launch?
should starship be made illegal to save the planet from global warming?

Anonymous No. 16102798

currently the carbon footprint of a Starship launch is about equal to the fuel use of a medium town for a week

Anonymous No. 16102823

>>16102798
Starship must be stopped.

Image not available

720x404

1704120818793875.webm

Anonymous No. 16102825

>>16102823
>>16102790
>meanwhile in india

Anonymous No. 16102880

How about we instead liquidate 10 000 bugmen. Their lifetime emissions will be greater than a single Starship launch.

Image not available

656x670

1681519344669878.jpg

Anonymous No. 16102997

>>16102790
OP is Chinese, or under their influence, trying to slow down American launch capability.

Another Century of Humiliation for China is beginning. China will lose WW3 and all Chinamen will suffer great indignities because of it, and there is nothing you can do about it LMAO

Image not available

972x959

1698681819044501.jpg

Anonymous No. 16102998

inb4
>attempts

Image not available

1100x1244

1683879729728636.png

Anonymous No. 16103000

inb4 OP starts spamming this nonsense again

Anonymous No. 16103002

The dumbest thing about starship is that it will require multiple launches for anything beyond low earth, assuming Musk can actually prove starship to starship refueling.

Anonymous No. 16103005

>>16102825
that is easily fixed if you'd just give up your car and ride on public transport

Anonymous No. 16103010

>>16103002
The purpose of Starship is to launch massive military satellite constellations into LEO.

Anonymous No. 16103064

>>16102790
Elon of all people should be making electric rockets

Anonymous No. 16103072

>>16103002
>it will require multiple launches

Good thing it'll be reusable

Anonymous No. 16103074

>>16102790
low quality bait

Anonymous No. 16103096

>>16103072
Hopefully its launch pad will be.

Anonymous No. 16103187

>>16102998
That's impressive.

Image not available

400x200

1695345816825704.gif

Anonymous No. 16103660

>OP abandons thread after being dunked on with facts and logic

Anonymous No. 16103897

>>16103096
Whats the carbon footprint of that launch pad?

Anonymous No. 16104295

>>16102790
its massive

Anonymous No. 16104314

>>16103002
No really, it can get a lot of mass to GTO even without refueling.

Though I assume we will see a bunch of kick stages for it made by companies like impulse space.

Anonymous No. 16104315

>>16102790
Better to kill all vermin like you to save the planet.

Image not available

800x789

1702093779246.png

Anonymous No. 16104450

>>16104315