Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 21:43:47 UTC No. 16103816

>>16103809
Insufficiant data for a meaningful answer.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 21:47:22 UTC No. 16103823

While common sense may initially reject this notion, it becomes plausible when we consider that the patterns and resources comprising the universe are indeed finite. Even though our perception might lead us to see it as infinite, it could very well be an illusion.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 22:05:49 UTC No. 16103856

after BILLIONS of years of technological development, we probably will manufacture new universes in a lab, assuming the civilization lives that long

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 22:24:45 UTC No. 16103890

>>16103816
the absolute state of everything, you have to guess

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 23:42:39 UTC No. 16103998

time is a circle

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 23:44:23 UTC No. 16104000

>>16103809
Depends how many humans there are, what resources they're using, how much they are using, where they get those resources from, etc.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Mar 2024 23:49:46 UTC No. 16104006

seems like it's someone else's problem really.

Anonymous at Sat, 30 Mar 2024 04:29:11 UTC No. 16104343

>>16103816
recommend a percentage

Anonymous at Sat, 30 Mar 2024 05:28:32 UTC No. 16104385

>>16103809
On one hand, matter can't be created or destroyed, mostly, right? I guess that means things are pre-configured, not exhausted permanently?
On the other hand, the universe expanding causes a big problem for the future of possibly being unable to reach large portions of it once the Universe has aged long enough
Also I don't really understand Entropy but it doesn't sound too conducive to having omnipresent stable life

Also x2, eventually we will speciate into some new Homos, so they wont be humans amigo

Anonymous at Sat, 30 Mar 2024 05:30:21 UTC No. 16104387

>>16103809
the causal realm is where we live, harness the acausal and you have unlimited energy