Image not available

1160x826

FQKA.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16103875

which one of these is correct?

Anonymous No. 16103907

>>16103875
Without having looked into it myself, my knee jerk assumption is that the scientific papers that both of those articles are written about are both correct, but the journalists added some idiotic conjectures on top to make it more clickbaity

Anonymous No. 16103915

>>16103875
Theyre both right. Its angulat momentum. Skyscrapers move mass away from earths center of mass, causing slower spin. the polar ice caps melting moves mass closer to the center, causing faster spin. its like a figure skater stretching arms out to rotate slower or pulling them close to spin faster.

next.

Anonymous No. 16103921

>>16103915
sorry buddy, ya got something backwards

Anonymous No. 16103926

>>16103875
The right-side effect is delaying having to add a negative second by three years. The acceleration is slowing down, in other words.

Anonymous No. 16104018

>>16103875
neither, global warming is fake

Anonymous No. 16104198

>>16103915
If there is more mass in the center it should be faster not slower, i think you mistyped what you wanted to say

Anonymous No. 16104318

>>16103875
>Moon and idkw changes Earth rotational speed by +100 arbitrary units after x years
>Muh ice changes Earth rotational speed by -5 arbitrary units after x years
Both can be true and the problem is journalism/you mediocrity.

Anonymous No. 16104578

>>16103915
>>16103926
>>16104318
The rotation will be the sum of all rotational and counter-rotational forces. It can ONLY be one or the other.

Anonymous No. 16104594

>>16103907
Cope

Anonymous No. 16104596

>>16104018
>, global warming is fake
This

Anonymous No. 16105575

>>16103875
you can think of a scenario where both claims are true, a long term acceleration in spin followed by a short term deceleration, or one of them can be wrong, or both.

Anonymous No. 16105580

>>16103907
>>16103915
>>16104318
>>16105575
These.

Anonymous No. 16106666

>>16103915
>Skyscrapers move mass away from earths center of mass,
only if the materials for the skyscrapers were mined at a lower elevation than the building, which is doubtful given that most skyscrapers are located very close to sea level

Anonymous No. 16106708

>>16103875
second one

Anonymous No. 16107371

>>16106708
why

Anonymous No. 16108070

>>16103875
Neither - both are hypothesizing mechanism which *could* slow or speed the Earth's rotation, but neither has investigated which is actually occurring (if any).

You see this a lot in pop-sci "research", retarded what-ifs without any basis in empirical observation.

Aspiring investor No. 16108420

>>16103875
Wheres the 'mogus?

Anonymous No. 16108909

>>16106666
Also most of the mass of the skyscrapers is in their lower portions

bodhi No. 16108913

>>16103875
journalists are the platonic form of a midwit redditor so your question of which midwit is more retarded is inconsequential

Anonymous No. 16108916

>>16103875
WOW THE SPEED OF SCIENCE IS CHANGING SO DYNAMICALLY

Image not available

2048x2048

Coriolis_effect.svg.png

Anonymous No. 16108969

>>16103875
coriolis effect.
left picture is in new york. northern hemisphere. coriolis effect adds to the clockwise rotation of the hands on the clock.

second picture, that's antarctic ice. south pole, inverse effect.

Anonymous No. 16109999

>>16108913
Reddit has enforced echoing of MSM (((wisdom))) because Reddit is an propaganda outlet thinly disguised as a social media site. Reddit is owned by the Newhouse brothers, sons of Si Newhouse, who was the American version of Ghislaine Maxwell's father

Image not available

1488x420

5cientist.png

Anonymous No. 16111119

>>16109999

Anonymous No. 16111486

>>16103875
Earth's motion has never been detected in any terrestrial experiment. Every attempt has proven the opposite but got brushed away with magical new theories because the COPEernican principle is an unfalsifiable religious beLIEf.

Anonymous No. 16112630

>>16103875
soiyentism religious fanatics will believe anything as long as its prefaced with "scyence says"

Anonymous No. 16113328

>>16108420
Flatiron building, 4th window up on the corner roy

Anonymous No. 16113366

>>16112630
When did your pastor tell you that?

bodhi No. 16113512

>>16109999
nice digits, quads of truth

Anonymous No. 16113518

>>16109999
>Reddit is owned by
No, Reddit is a publicly traded company, anyone can own shares in it.

Anonymous No. 16114823

>>16113518
Advance Publications still owns the controlling shares and the Newhouse brothers still own Advance Publications
>I come to 4chan to defend Reddit from criticism
Are you jewish?

Anonymous No. 16116501

>>16114823
>Are you jewish?
oy vey the goyims know!!!

Anonymous No. 16116618

>>16103915
Skyscrapers would have little effect because their mass is miniscule in comparison to the Earth's mass.

The melting of polar ice-caps moves mass AWAY from the axis of rotation, which increases the moment of inertia. It also creates more liquid, which means stronger tidal forces, which also slows the Earth's rotation.

Unsure what could be speeding up the Earth's spin... Your mum's farts when she's westward facing maybe?

Anonymous No. 16117949

>>16116618
>It also creates more liquid, which means stronger tidal forces, which also slows the Earth's rotation.
false

Anonymous No. 16118482

>>16117949
Floating ice is just as must subject to tidal forces as water is

Anonymous No. 16119919

>>16118482
Everything on the planet is subject to the same tidal forces, floating or not. Some things are just more rigid than others

Anonymous No. 16120472

>>16103875
Neither, global warming is fake

Anonymous No. 16121302

>>16111119
>quintwumple 1s