sage this shit at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 01:32:00 UTC No. 16105722

GPT is the worst kind of word soup, one that appears to make sense. Its only valid use is as a schizo post generator.

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 01:46:45 UTC No. 16105739

>>16105722
>Its only valid use is as a schizo post generator.
weirdly accurate
apparently training an AI on a large number of important books produces a schizo

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 04:11:44 UTC No. 16105865

if 2+2=5 then 2=2 must be false.
this is a necessary result of AI getting programmed with schizo leftist fantasies

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 06:19:25 UTC No. 16105945

>>16105654
>>16105654
I kinda see what it was going for, it's algorithm must have been like, *no it's not a prime because my bazillion miles of training data says so. it also says that even numbers can't be prime because they are divisible by two. let's just say it's divisible by 2 so it can't be. oh wait, it is two. well let's just pretty up the language a bit."

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 07:05:06 UTC No. 16105970

>>16105722
Its was never turtles, its schizos all the way down.
I was just reading another discussion about GPT bots ruining nearly all online discussion.
I have to agree that is mostly true. Its all word salad. Gibberish that buries, derails, disinforms, and overwhelms.
Some of it is deliberately malicious, particularly when any discussion of social or political issues occurs. But I think a lot of it floods into other areas as well, including science boards, simply because those developing AI bots see all media as a perfect free testing and training ground for their creations.
The effect is to make most online discussion uninteresting and unfulfilling, driving away those with something original and interesting to say, I am not so sure about the normies and schizos though, I dont think they realize what is happening, perhaps they are happy to engage with meaningless content.

The question that arises now is where does all this lead us with respect to open discourse online?

Here's a pause for thought. If Chatgpt and other AI bots drive away the educated and intelligent users, then its only left to interact with the ignorant, the mentally ill, and those of low intelligence.

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 10:59:20 UTC No. 16106102

>>16105739
>apparently training an AI on a large number of important books produces a schizo

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 11:06:00 UTC No. 16106109

>>16105739
ngl I met plenty of people saying retarded shit with the confidence of ChatGPT. quite often, and in many areas.
at this moment ChatGPT is that retard who did read a lot of books but is weirdly still a drooling moron, can't do shit with it but at most regurgitate it. if you ask him to build something with what he learned he'll bsod

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 11:07:57 UTC No. 16106111

>>16105722
It can't even do simple Caesar encoding of a random text. At most it will print a description of the algorithm. If it tries it fails miserably.

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 11:24:21 UTC No. 16106121

>>16105865
you dont know that.
You spout the same logical nonsense as the AI does!

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 11:51:11 UTC No. 16106152

>>16106109
kinda this. it's like when they're presented with conflicting information, they chose what to trust randomly.

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 11:57:46 UTC No. 16106157

>>16105970
>If Chatgpt and other AI bots drive away the educated and intelligent users, then its only left to interact with the ignorant, the mentally ill, and those of low intelligence.
Fuck artificial intelligence, 4chan had already achieved the same effect over a decade ago using genuine stupidity.

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 13:03:21 UTC No. 16106243

>>16105654
I wonder what would happen if you ask it any other prime number.

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 13:26:20 UTC No. 16106278

>>16106157
Yes. Although 4chan has always been the refuge for trailer trash tier troglodytes they could at least write in a somewhat human fashion. Likewise, even the ESLs, whose comprehension skills fall short of reaching classification as sentient life, still managed to convey a human tone.

AI bots are different though. With the ESLs and trailer trash the point of any post usually sails so far over their heads it gathers interstellar dust, but unlike the AI their responses can be readily identified and ignored. The AI posts however give such a mixed up degree of mutilation, of common sense and grammatical construction, that it takes a moment of consideration to recognize them as such. Resulting in brain flatulence.

But that really wouldn't be such a problem if the frequency of their posts were on a human scale. However the frequency of AI posts are increasing dramatically, effectively reducing forums from being barely digestible slop that nevertheless can still be consumed, into a sterile barren wasteland to be avoided. This convinces many of us that it is time to throw the women and children into the brine to make room on the lifeboats.

Soon AI's will learn how to talk like trailer trash and ESLs. Telling people to fuck their mothers, that they are schizo retards, to take meds, all while missing the point at near Earth orbit levels. Which is fine, but any creativity and original thought will by then have ceased to exist on any forum. No more gems to pluck from the coal face.

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 14:39:19 UTC No. 16106351

Why is it always assumed humans are correct and AI is wrong? Maybe it is right. Perhaps if we throw out 2 as a prime number, it will be easier to prove various prime number theorems.

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 14:48:51 UTC No. 16106357

>>16106351
There are infinitely many primes that are odd.
Yet only one prime that is even.
Mathematicians see no problems with this, even though it implies a specialness to the number 2 or even worse a specialness to a certain base system.
Never made sense to consider it prime.
>But muh heckin definition!?
Who the fuck cares? Modify the definition to say a prime number's only odd divisors are itself and 1.

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 14:59:43 UTC No. 16106370

>>16106152
They don't choose, the trust what they encountered first.

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 15:06:50 UTC No. 16106377

>>16106357
The specialness is in the definition of even VS odd. If it is divisible by 2 then it is even. That's what makes 2 special. If I say class A, B, and C sets are numbers that have 0, 1, and 2 remainder when divided by 3 (Z_3), then there will only be one prime number in class A. Not special, just a consequence of combining the definition of odd/even with the set of primes.

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 15:41:23 UTC No. 16106407

>>16105945
no, it's just predictive text

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 17:18:53 UTC No. 16106488

>try to use hammer to insert a screw
>screw breaks
>blame hammer
ChatGPT is made for language, not math

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 17:57:27 UTC No. 16106537

>>16105654
Isn't the way people post GPT3 shit to prove AI is dumb prove the opposite? - As in they couldn't easily get GPT4 to say dumb shit (which is certainly possible). Considering the progression, GPT5 (coming in months) will be that much harder to fool and it's very likely that we're nowhere near peak AI .

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 18:00:09 UTC No. 16106539

>>16106537
I think whatever the fuck they working on right now has some type of reasoning. curious to what degree. different than what LLM agents do now

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 18:20:01 UTC No. 16106554

>>16106539
they're just slapping on more models on top of more models and hoping it somehow gets it
it'll be a frankenstein with no actual value

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 18:22:42 UTC No. 16106558

>>16106351
> Maybe it is right. Perhaps if we throw out 2 as a prime
Can somebody kill this nigger for me?

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 18:24:47 UTC No. 16106560

>>16106357
>Mathematicians see no problems with this, even though it implies a specialness to the number 2
No, it doesn't. 3 is the only prime divisible by 3, 5 the only prime divisible by 5, etc.
>or even worse a specialness to a certain base system
It has nothing to do with the base

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 01:53:34 UTC No. 16107165

>>16105654
Is this rather chatGPT version? Didn't they integrate it with wolfram alpha?

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 01:54:34 UTC No. 16107168

>>16107165
A recent* chatGPT version

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 07:28:05 UTC No. 16107488

>>16106537
Exactly, and yet that is what retards cant wrap their stupid heads around. They point to any flaws in the present and can't see where its going in the future. Literally subhumans. I wouldn't mind their existence so much if only they kept their ignorant mouths shut but they cant even manage that.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 08:01:27 UTC No. 16107498

>>16106537
>>16107488
Ask GPT4 to type "egypt" backwards.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 08:52:05 UTC No. 16107515

>>16105654
yeah but

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 13:26:57 UTC No. 16107729

>>16107498
It says "Tpyge"
What is your point exactly?

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 13:51:01 UTC No. 16107752

>>16106109
Yes but people don't hype up retards to death like they do LLMs.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 14:07:33 UTC No. 16107769

>>16107729
ask it "consider the numbers 1 through 20. Which of them can be divided by 3 and also contain the digit 3? Both conditions need to be met. "

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 14:32:06 UTC No. 16107794

>>16107769
Ask it to take out the spade you shoved sideways up your ass.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 14:42:50 UTC No. 16107804

>>16107794
Did it tell you that 12 answers the criteria too? Thought so.

Anonymous Mogul at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 09:34:10 UTC No. 16109056

>>16105654
Where's the lie?

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:33:43 UTC No. 16109526

>>16105654

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:07:10 UTC No. 16109565

>>16106377
it is special oddly enough
2 has special place in the theorem of existence of primitive roots modulo n
2 is necessary for fermat primes and ruler-compass constructions

in both of these cases we have to care about 'odd primes', because 2 acts strangely, but these were the only examples I can think of

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:46:45 UTC No. 16109600

>>16105654
But /g/ told me GPT was going to replace mathematicians soon?

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 21:11:08 UTC No. 16109702

>>16106278
>The AI posts however give such a mixed up degree of mutilation, of common sense and grammatical construction, that it takes a moment of consideration to recognize them as such. Resulting in brain flatulence.


It's like those AI-generated gibberish images. It gets through the first-pass filter of your brain because it has all the signs of semantic information, but upon inspection contains nothing.

It's extremely aggravating because it wastes time. Your brain can't filter it. I wish we had a name for it

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 21:41:22 UTC No. 16109718

>>16105654
If they just scraped a few more /sci/ schizoposts I'm sure it'll be ready to become our post-scarcity glorious divine leader

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:14:42 UTC No. 16109754

>>16107769
?
Your refusal to adapt to new technology will leave you hopelessly behind your peers.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:26:59 UTC No. 16109767

>>16105865
>if 2+2=5 then 2=2 must be false.
You might as well say that if 2+2=5, then pigs could fly.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:49:33 UTC No. 16109812

>>16105654
FOR USE AS BAIT ONLY:
>No, 2 is not a prime number. By definition, a prime number is a positive integer greater than 1 that is divisible only by 1 and itself. While 2 is indeed a positive integer, it is divisible by 1 and 2, which means it has two divisors, not just 1 and itself. Prime numbers have exactly two distinct divisors, 1 and the number itself. Therefore, 2 is not considered a prime number because it does not meet this criterion.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 17:10:31 UTC No. 16110837

>>16105654
>literal ai generated post
Kys

Cult of Passion at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 17:21:11 UTC No. 16110848

>>16106357
>Never made sense to consider it prime.
Huh, that would make Egyptian Math, powers of 2 up or down, a Prime base system.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 20:05:25 UTC No. 16111034

>>16106351
assuming for a second you're seriously asking, doing that breaks the fundamental theorem of arithmetic for all even numbers, which is kind of the most important prime number theorem there is

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 20:08:15 UTC No. 16111036

>>16111034
funnily enough, the consequence of this is that 2... actually becomes special again, as the only number whose multiples break the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. you can't actually make 2 "non-special" by making it non-prime

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 20:13:43 UTC No. 16111038

why is 1 not a prime? it's the most based number

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 20:18:31 UTC No. 16111044

>>16105722
I suspect a lot of the "people" we've interacted with on the internet over the last 10 years or so have been chatGPT-like LLMs. Some people confabulate and behave exactly like this and have for a while. They're like bots with biological bodies. The superficially intelligent and well constructed grammar and so on disguises that they just mindlessly pattern match and use semantic reasoning. I've thought about the relative paradise one would achieve by wiping them off the face of the earth more than once.