🧵 No one died from covid
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 05:05:43 UTC No. 16105912
I can prove empirically that no one died from covid. I do not mean to say that no individual died as a result of covid-19 infection, but rather that there were no excess deaths, and that covid deaths were simply the expected seasonal illness, old age, and general ill-health deaths, but concentrated into a short timespan.
For this analysis we are going to look at total deaths by year from Sweden. For those of you who don't recall, Sweden is a very important case study because they were the only western country who did not have lockdowns and other heavy-handed counter measures. Although they did have some trivial restrictions for a short time, broadly speaking they are what we may have expected to happen everywhere if the nations of the earth chose to do absolutely nothing.
This is critical as it is generally assumed the covid toll would have been much worse if not for the unprecedented response, while some claim the response actually caused more harm and deaths. That's why Sweden is the only uncorrupted dataset.
This chart is the actual deaths per year, raw numbers not rates adjusted to population. You can clearly see the massive covid spike, over 9000 more than the previous year - 88,766 deaths in 2019 and 98,124 in 2020. The excess was mostly concentrated into a few weeks in March-April, this was all over the news globally and was used to justify lockdowns in other countries. A grave mistake costing thousands of lives, easily avoided if they had just listened to the experts and trusted the science?
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 05:18:41 UTC No. 16105918
Let's look a little closer.
Something which should stand out about that chart is the unusually low lumber of deaths in 2019. That year the flu was particularly mild, this trend was repeated in most countries of Europe. Simply put, thousands of elderly and infirm who may have died as a result of illness in other years, were still alive. These geriatrics didn't suddenly figure out how to defeat death, they'd just by pure chance had it put off for a while longer. This would be expected to lead to an excess of deaths in the coming years.
So 2020 brings us covid. There is no doubt that covid did indeed cause a big spike in deaths in early 2020. But who were those deaths? The news was telling us that it was a grave risk to all of us, young and old alike were being struck down indiscriminately. Statistically this was not the case. In fact, covid was LESS dangerous than a regular flu to anyone who wasn't elderly or in particularly bad health.
So how to verify this? You could look at deaths by age group, but that doesn't take into account the risk status of those dying at younger ages. It's actually better just to do it with total deaths. If it was only some excess from the previous year, and some who might have otherwise died in the next year or so, then we could smooth those three years of deaths, 2019-2021, and see if this big outlier of 2020 has caused any deviation from the broader trend.
So here it is. The total number of deaths across those three years is exactly the same as what really occurred, I have simply averaged them, set 2020 to that average, and adjusted the years on either side to give a linear increase. Just to be clear again, I did not remove any deaths, only spread them out over those 3 years more smoothly, the total number is identical.
What we see is that those three years grouped actually SLOWED the increase in the number of deaths, which is now ramping up again.
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 05:43:32 UTC No. 16105933
This inaction was supposedly the worst case scenario, modeling gave some absolutely wild predictions of deaths if nothing was done, and is still being used to justify the covid response in hindsight. Yet in the long run Sweden did better than most countries. So we can say pretty conclusively from this that there was no real point in doing anything in response to covid. Sweden did not suffer some massive disaster, they simply removed their allocation of expiring boomers in a shorter time period than usual. When graphed on the full scale it looks pretty insignificant even without adjusting.
Source for the data is here:
>https://www.scb.se/en/finding-stat
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 05:50:51 UTC No. 16105935
>>16105912
idk about Sweden, I just know that in America many old people in republican-leaning counties were murdered via ventilators in a deliberate attempt to cull their electorate. Ever since, it's been noted that Biden does better among older voters than a Democrat typically does. That's because they murdered so many.
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 06:33:43 UTC No. 16105952
>>16105912
such heavy mind control happening that it boggles the mind
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UQYTb
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 07:13:28 UTC No. 16105974
>>16105952
It did been like that didn't it
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 08:38:24 UTC No. 16106019
>>16105912
Meanwhile, on Earth
Republicans died 2x as much as Democrats once the vaccine became available:
https://www.npr.org/2023/07/25/1189
Unvaccinated were more likely to die of heart risks due to the disease than the vaccinated:
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/ot
Although the vaccine became less effective against variants the vaccinated were more protected against early death than the unvaccinated:
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71
Covid-19, the "Pandemic of the unvaccinated"
https://www.npr.org/2021/07/16/1017
You people lied, people died. Fuck you and your misinformation campaign.
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 08:45:11 UTC No. 16106022
>>16106019
Republicans didn't die, they were murdered, see >>16105935 and it started all the way back in 2020
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 08:55:31 UTC No. 16106026
>>16106019
>npr
>msn
Lmao nice sources dude
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 08:57:34 UTC No. 16106028
>>16106019
>Republicans died 2x as much as Democrats once the vaccine became available
>data about the vaccination status of each of the 538,159 people who died in the two states wasn't available, researchers could only go as granular as the county level in assessing excess deaths and vaccination rates.
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:04:08 UTC No. 16106029
>>16105933
nice analysis anon, the deBOONKers will probably be in here soon to deBOONK you
>>16106019
Oh there they are. And like always, they don't actually argue against the OP but rather copy-paste a bunch of out-of-date, biased, disproven sources on why le bad antivaxxers are killing people with their "misinformation".
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:05:21 UTC No. 16106031
>>16106019
You didn't address any of the points I made
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:21:56 UTC No. 16106036
>>16106029
If the CDC says something you can pretty much guarantee it's the opposite at this point. If you actually read their studies they are bad to the point of being outright fraud, they are clearly manipulating statistics in such a way that they can reach some predetermined conclusion. But no one ever actually reads them, not doctors or scientists and especially not journalists.
That for me was the most shocking thing about covid, not that organizations like the CDC would lie because they are just a branch of pharma at this point. But that it was painfully obvious how dishonest they were being with their 'research' and yet almost no one called them out on it. I realized then that there is almost no such thing as experts, anyone at level of education is likely to be non-functional retarded outside of a clear framework of what to do or say being laid out for them. Basically society is a cargo cult which has advanced on the work of 0.0001% of the population. The rest can LARP as understanding their work and following in their footsteps, but they are just superficially following a template of what a smart and competent person should do, they are not actually smart and competent themselves.
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:44:36 UTC No. 16106055
>>16105912
It's still never been isolated and purified, not that non-living viruses even work how the big pharma media says they do.
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 21:24:47 UTC No. 16106812
>>16106326
2022 should be just over 9 for Sweden. Not sure if that graph was made with incomplete data or what.
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 21:57:00 UTC No. 16106855
>>16106026
Check the actual sources dumb nigger
>>16106029
>>16106031
If they are too retarded they are not even worth "addressing"
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 22:04:54 UTC No. 16106861
>>16106326
This is the real one for Sweden, just a little different on the last couple years.
>>16106855
>too dumb to understand
>calls others dumb
classic stitch up, good one m8.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 06:31:00 UTC No. 16107458
>>16106325
Greatest country in the world LOL
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 09:23:30 UTC No. 16107531
>>16105918
Congratulations for your discovery of the moving average