🧵 Late cherry blossoms proves global warming is fake
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 06:39:11 UTC No. 16105956
Cherry blossoms bloom in Tokyo, 15 days later than last year, 5 days later than average
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2
Cherry blossoms finally burst into bloom in Tokyo on Friday after heavy rain in the morning, marking the latest blooming in over a decade.
The declaration of the blooming made by the Meteorological Agency came 15 days later than last year and five days later than in an average year. Private forecasters had also expected this year's bloom to come much earlier.
Friday’s blooming is the latest in Tokyo since 2012, when cherry blossoms were declared to have blossomed on March 31, according to the agency.
Cherry blossom forecasting is big business in Japan. As early as in January, companies start to issue forecasts for when cherry blossoms will first bloom and reach their peak.
The weather agency, which began forecasting the annual bloom in 1955, sets a government standard for observing cherry blossom trees. For consistency, the meteorological agency only uses data gathered from the Somei-Yoshino variety, which produces pale pink blossoms.
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 06:39:33 UTC No. 16105958
There are 58 example trees across the nation preselected by the agency, with these used by private weather forecast companies. In Tokyo, for instance, the tree is located at Yasukuni Shrine in Chiyoda Ward.
According to the rules set by the agency in declaring the annual bloom, a tree is considered to be blossoming once five or six flowers have opened on the branches of the tree. Once 80% of the tree has flowered, it’s deemed to be in full bloom.
This year marks the first time since 2020 that cherry blossom-viewing, or hanami, a major seasonal event in Japan, can be held in the absence of COVID-19 guidance, as the government downgraded its classification of the coronavirus in May last year.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 06:42:58 UTC No. 16105961
>>16105956
what about jews genociding palestinians, though? it's time to stop criticizing misguided energy policy.
https://odysee.com/@Realfake_Newsou
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 06:56:34 UTC No. 16105966
>>16105956
This actually proves climate change.
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 07:15:05 UTC No. 16105977
Vernalization: That one thing Lysenko was in fact right about.
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:55:43 UTC No. 16106066
>>16105977
He plagiarized that idea from western botanists
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 20:30:17 UTC No. 16106724
Why is it so cold in Japan if global warming is real?
Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 20:38:21 UTC No. 16106739
>>16105956
>5 days later than average
>last year was 10 days earlier than average
I guess you have been debunked because we are now closer to the average.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 05:15:47 UTC No. 16107386
>>16106724
global warming isn't real
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 00:05:31 UTC No. 16108535
>>16105956
>According to the rules set by the agency in declaring the annual bloom
They don't need a government agency to announce when trees are in bloom, it is readily apparent without the government saying anything.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:02:41 UTC No. 16109485
>>16108535
>do you have a loicense to look at that tree?
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:11:50 UTC No. 16109498
>>16105966
>change
cleverest thing they ever did was switch to this word which can mean literally anything
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 06:25:48 UTC No. 16110228
Japs have a major affinity for cherry trees, but they're not a major producer of cherries. Does this seem odd to anyone else?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 07:40:41 UTC No. 16110310
>>16110228
no, they like ornamental cherry trees
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 13:37:59 UTC No. 16110629
>>16105956
The peak bloom of the cherry trees in Washington DC was the second earliest on record. They actually hedge their bets and plan a three and half week cherry blossom festival there, but the peak bloom was a week before it started.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 13:44:43 UTC No. 16110635
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 13:46:31 UTC No. 16110637
>>16109498
That tricky Bush Administration
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 13:47:31 UTC No. 16110638
>>16105956
>He doesn't understand the difference between weather and climate
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:01:06 UTC No. 16110655
Guy on /sci/ tries to use single data point to disprove decades of climate research again, gets horribly proven wrong again. News at 11
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 21:57:59 UTC No. 16111209
>>16110638
>weather is when its colder than average
>global warming is when its warmer than average
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 14:38:03 UTC No. 16112080
>>16111209
>He doesn't understand the difference between weather and climate
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 21:21:07 UTC No. 16112588
>>16110635
>muh political propaganda website says its true
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 21:36:01 UTC No. 16112601
>>16112588
Okay, waiting patiently until you present better data
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 07:54:46 UTC No. 16113324
>>16110635
>cherry blossoms were later during the little ice age
so?
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Apr 2024 04:40:14 UTC No. 16114781
>>16113324
Thats one of the most common tricks of the global warming grifters
>I started my data set with the little ice age, that makes it look like its warmer today than it was in 1700 because of global warming
meanwhile somehow or other the previous ice age managed to come to an end with no change at all in atmospheric CO2 levels, but they can never explain how or why that happened
>Its warmer now than it was in February, that proves global warming is real
would be an equality valid argument
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Apr 2024 06:18:10 UTC No. 16114883
>>16110635
noooo you can't just refute my single datapoint!
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Apr 2024 06:25:38 UTC No. 16114889
>>16105956
>yet another "retard thinks he's figured it all out and is smarter than millions of scientists" thread
Is that all this board is now?
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Apr 2024 06:28:47 UTC No. 16114894
>>16114781
>meanwhile somehow or other the previous ice age managed to come to an end with no change at all in atmospheric CO2 levels, but they can never explain how or why that happened
You fucking retard. If you don't even know what these are then you have no business talking about the climate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milan
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Apr 2024 06:42:19 UTC No. 16114900
>>16106724
Climate change not global warming
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Apr 2024 07:12:14 UTC No. 16116508
>>16114894
so you're saying that the earth's position and orbit relative to the sun is what dominates the climate and CO2 has no influence whatsoever
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 00:51:44 UTC No. 16117767
>>16116508
Exactly
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 11:38:52 UTC No. 16118438
>>16105956
Thats not the only evidence its fake
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 22:39:50 UTC No. 16119964
Anonymous at Tue, 9 Apr 2024 00:06:02 UTC No. 16120078
>>16116508
>>16117767
Wrong.
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 9 Apr 2024 07:55:05 UTC No. 16120531
>>16120078
proof?
do you have evidence at all that co2 causes the memehouse effect?
Anonymous at Tue, 9 Apr 2024 08:10:55 UTC No. 16120554
>>16116508
>>16117767
Not what I'm saying at all. The climate is influenced by multiple different factors. That the Earth's orbital characteristics are one of the larger contributors doesn't mean that CO2 has "no influence whatsoever."
>>16120531
There is mountains of proof. Literally decades worth of research that you can find easily. But you won't accept any sources that don't agree with you anyway.
Anonymous at Tue, 9 Apr 2024 08:12:33 UTC No. 16120558
>>16120531
>do you have evidence at all that co2 causes the memehouse effect?
Explain how the earth maintains a stable temperature if CO2 is not a greenhouse gas using physics and chem8, kgo
Anonymous at Tue, 9 Apr 2024 12:25:21 UTC No. 16120763
>>16120558
Water vapor
Anonymous at Tue, 9 Apr 2024 13:39:34 UTC No. 16120843
>>16106724
>what is global average
right now it's slightly colder in Japan and it's significantly warmer in Europe
fuck, it's almost 30°C today
next year it might be the other way around, but overall the temperature will go up
Anonymous at Tue, 9 Apr 2024 16:01:59 UTC No. 16120961
>>16120763
Try again.
Anonymous at Tue, 9 Apr 2024 18:29:34 UTC No. 16121160
>>16120961
Water vapor
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 9 Apr 2024 18:33:40 UTC No. 16121168
>>16120558
Explain how Mars has massive daily temperature swings with over 3000% more CO2 per unit surface area than Earth if CO2 is a greenhouse gas that can trap heat in an atmosphere.
Mars has no measurable greenhouse effect regardless massive amounts of CO2, which proves that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas.
Anonymous at Tue, 9 Apr 2024 19:15:00 UTC No. 16121240
>>16105956
ghosts did it.
Anonymous at Tue, 9 Apr 2024 22:03:06 UTC No. 16121510
>>16121168
>what is partial pressure
The current partial pressure of CO2 on Earth is 31.7 mmHg. The partial pressure of CO2 on Mars is 4.4 mmHg. Earth has WAY more CO2 than Mars does.
Anonymous at Tue, 9 Apr 2024 23:02:05 UTC No. 16121549
>>16121160
Try again.
Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:03:02 UTC No. 16121776
>>16121549
Water vapor
Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:05:29 UTC No. 16121780
>>16114889
The vaccines were supposed to kill everyone in 2 weeks according to the doctors on /sci/. I'm sure the climatologists, glaciologists, and atmospheric chemists here also totally refuted global warming.
Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:52:56 UTC No. 16123046
>>16121510
>Earth has WAY more CO2 than Mars does.
this is the extent of lying that global warming hoaxers are willing to go to in order to shill their political narrative
Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:54:28 UTC No. 16123052
>>16105956
That’s not how it works. It’s only when it confirms the science (tm) that it’s true. Right now it’s just a coincidence. Last year it was science. Get it straight.
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 11 Apr 2024 09:03:56 UTC No. 16123826
>>16123052
Thats normally referred to as confirmation bias
Anonymous at Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:57:32 UTC No. 16124417
>>16121776
Try again.
Anonymous at Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:58:33 UTC No. 16124418
>>16123046
>>16123052
>>16123826
>Imagine being this retarded
Anonymous at Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:29:48 UTC No. 16124786
>>16124417
Water vapor
Anonymous at Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:30:35 UTC No. 16124787
>>16123046
>I don't understand partial pressure and I refuse to
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 07:29:35 UTC No. 16125215
>>16124787
Mars has over 3000% more CO2 per unit surface area in its atmosphere than Earth does and Mars has no measurable greenhouse effect. This proves that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 07:43:57 UTC No. 16125235
>>16124787
>If I am pompous repeatedly, the fools will believe me.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:06:15 UTC No. 16125257
>>16105956
Random fluctuations don't disprove anything. We're talking about the long term average.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:07:16 UTC No. 16125261
>>16125215
>This proves that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas.
No, it doesn't.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:10:13 UTC No. 16125265
>>16110635
If the downward trend started in 1800, doesn't that disprove the claim that "climate change" is man made?
>MUH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION
Was not producing the amount of carbon needed for such warming.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:19:22 UTC No. 16125271
>>16125265
That actually makes sense, idk why that didn't occur to me.
I would have to ask a climate doomer sometime, but if I had to make a steelman I'd say that the warming started with exiting the little ice age, and was followed by man-made change.
A little too convenient though
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 13:56:38 UTC No. 16125589
>>16124786
Try again
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 13:57:56 UTC No. 16125592
>>16125215
>>16125235
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parti
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:36:04 UTC No. 16125741
>>16125589
Water vapor
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:55:22 UTC No. 16125769
>>16125741
Try again.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:47:54 UTC No. 16126034
>>16125769
Water vapor
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 19:11:18 UTC No. 16126057
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 19:15:28 UTC No. 16126064
>>16125215
I have a cotton blanket and I'm warm. My friend has a cotton sheet and he's cold.
Therefore cotton doesn't keep you warm.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 19:16:02 UTC No. 16126065
>>16126057
Why from 1995 to 2015?
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 19:23:02 UTC No. 16126076
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 23:23:54 UTC No. 16126466
>>16126034
>Explain how the earth maintains a stable temperature if CO2 is not a greenhouse gas using physics and chem8, kgo
Try again.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 13 Apr 2024 04:47:08 UTC No. 16126799
>>16126076
>source: http://globhomo-propagadna.com
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 13 Apr 2024 23:02:08 UTC No. 16127935
>>16126799
All of the """proof""" of global warming comes from that one source.
Anonymous at Sun, 14 Apr 2024 00:27:19 UTC No. 16128027
>>16126799
>propogadna
Anonymous at Sun, 14 Apr 2024 23:30:52 UTC No. 16129310
>>16126466
There is more water vapor than co2 in the atmosphere
water has more heat of evaporation, water and vapor has more specific heat than co2
Water is on the surface, and its vapor absorbs more solar radiation than CO2
Earth is covered and soaked in water not CO2. Carbonate binds to minearal harder than hydrate thus buffers far less.
Weather is majorly a result of air movement and humidity. No one predict how hot tomorrow is gonna be from CO2 concentration.
Temperature near bodies of water are always buffered more than those that has none.
Plant taps a kilogram of water out of the dirt earth to grow a few grams of mass, assuming the C all comes from co2 in the air. Coindicentally most plant grow near bodies of water and/or receive ample precipitation, also nice place to live.
Cloud single handedly block more solar or ground radiation than atmosphere, and the surface of the earth absorbs half of the solar heat, those with water buffers out, or reflects the heat back out with extreme surface temp if water and plant cover is not, saving ground water.
Yeah, i think you owe me an answer why I have to give a shit about your garbage statistics A mere correlates to garbage statistics B, in a comically large scale to call you bullshitting, assuming your crude approximate of an average of averages given arbitrary weights and sample intervals and other fudge factor is a perfect survey that makes the globe yield to the authority of people who never truly graduated from their advanced day care to make a living on their own. May be you should try getting a job.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Apr 2024 03:35:40 UTC No. 16129558
>>16129310
The concentration of atmospheric water vapor is local and driven by the local temperature because it has short atmospheric residence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globa
Water vapour
Water vapour does contribute to anthropogenic global warming, but as the GWP is defined, it is negligible for H2O: an estimate gives a 100-year GWP between -0.001 and 0.0005.[24]
H2O can function as a greenhouse gas because it has a profound infrared absorption spectrum with more and broader absorption bands than CO2. Its concentration in the atmosphere is limited by air temperature, so that radiative forcing by water vapour increases with global warming (positive feedback). But the GWP definition excludes indirect effects. GWP definition is also based on emissions, and anthropogenic emissions of water vapour (cooling towers, irrigation) are removed via precipitation within weeks, so its GWP is negligible.
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:58:23 UTC No. 16129982
>>16129558
quoting wikipedia is admitting that you have no idea what you're talking about, its also admitting and that you're too lazy and uninterested in the topic to go deeper than wikipedia
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Apr 2024 17:16:36 UTC No. 16130312
>>16129982
Making shit up and refusing to provide evidence for your claims is admitting that you have no idea what you're talking about. Me linking you to wikipedia is an indication that your arguments from ignorance are not worth my time to address. If you aren't willing to put the effort in to know what you're talking about then why should I put the effort in to hold your hand?
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 00:52:42 UTC No. 16130884
>>16130312
quoting wikipedia is admitting that you have no idea what you're talking about, its also admitting and that you're too lazy and uninterested in the topic to go deeper than wikipedia
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 02:52:38 UTC No. 16130998
>>16130884
Making shit up and refusing to provide evidence for your claims is admitting that you have no idea what you're talking about. Me linking you to wikipedia is an indication that your arguments from ignorance are not worth my time to address. If you aren't willing to put the effort in to know what you're talking about then why should I put the effort in to hold your hand?
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 21:24:20 UTC No. 16132145
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 21:49:45 UTC No. 16132168
>>16113324
The little ice age was a local event, not global!
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 21:56:44 UTC No. 16132180
>>16129558
>anthropogenic emissions of water vapour (cooling towers, irrigation) are removed via precipitation within weeks, so its GWP is negligible
What sort of fallacy is this? Just because the anthropogenic changes to the hydrological cycle are rapidly turned over doesn't make them less fundamental in their impact than something more abstracted. Our impacts may have a high frequency but they are foundational and deep. For heaven's sake, we create lakes, empty acquifers and join oceans together so we can sail through them. We divert rivers, we cut down forests, we grow forests in other places, we water crops.
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 21:58:51 UTC No. 16132185
>>16132180
>I hate humanity
>humanity is ruining the planet
why don't you kys is you hate humans?
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 22:09:55 UTC No. 16132202
>>16105956
>local weather proves climate change not real
Many such threads.
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 23:07:18 UTC No. 16132266
>>16132185
Where did I say I hate humans? I'm merely stating that if humans are affecting the lived world, then our carbon is the absolute least of the ways we do so, so if you want to improve the world, your efforts can be much better spent elsewhere.
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:07:24 UTC No. 16132458
>>16132180
>an estimate gives a 100-year GWP between -0.001 and 0.0005.[24]
Learn what that means. Water vapor cannot continue to contribute to global warming over 100 years because it precipitates out in a few weeks. If there was a single week GWP then water's figure would seem significant, but it's not, because the concentration of water vapor is driven by local temperatures. It can form a positive feedback loops with other greenhouse gasses, but water vapor cannot drive global warming. It even says so in that except
>Its concentration in the atmosphere is limited by air temperature, so that radiative forcing by water vapour increases with global warming (positive feedback).
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:08:24 UTC No. 16132461
>>16132458
>except
Excerpt*
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:46:41 UTC No. 16132482
>>16132458
Did the doctors grip your head too tightly with the forceps during the abortion giving you brain damage?
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 01:56:07 UTC No. 16132485
>>16132145
This is extreme misinformation and is proof that you're low IQ in that you either never studied what's happening because you're too stupid to try or did try and couldn't understand it.
Although humans contribute only a fraction of total CO2 in the atmosphere each year it comes from coal and oil which have been buried for millions of years, unlike naturally occurring CO2 which is recycled in the normal carbon cycle. If you add CO2 to a system in balance with no way to remove it, CO2 must rise over time, therefore humans are responsible for its increase in the atmosphere.
I'm sorry if you still don't understand that. Try and find someone more intelligent than you to dumb it down even further.
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 02:22:16 UTC No. 16132508
>>16132485
>if I add one drop of acid to the water the whole ocean will become acidified!!!!! Oh! Oh hold me I am going to cry!
Better you stay shut in with your echo group of hysterical bitches.
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 06:01:04 UTC No. 16132657
>>16132485
>All Fossil carbons were buried away.
From the surface. There were on the surface.
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:09:57 UTC No. 16132739
>>16132458
Just because the hydrological cycle has a quick turnover, doesn't mean humans aren't affecting it permanently. As long as we're affecting water, we're influencing climate and weather in a much stronger way than our CO2 emissions.
Any given molecule of water vapour we emit won't stay in the atmosphere for very long, but we emit a lot of molecules and we do it constantly, so we're constantly affecting the environment via our water emissions.
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:12:19 UTC No. 16132740
>>16132485
>If you add CO2 to a system in balance with no way to remove it, CO2 must rise over time
If you sequester CO2 away from a system as fossil fuels or carbonate minerals with no way to return it, CO2 must fall over time, until it begins to approach concentrations so low that life on Earth dies from lack of it.
Humans are the salvation of life on Earth because we figured out how to extract and return life-giving CO2 back to the atmosphere.
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 12:40:34 UTC No. 16132928
>>16132739
You're wrong. I have lead you to water and you have refused to drink. You are on your own.
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 12:41:35 UTC No. 16132931
>>16132508
>>16132657
>>16132740
Cope harder.
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 12:48:57 UTC No. 16132941
>>16132931
>cope
>The admission of defeat by inferior minds.
We accept your concession in the face of our facts and our superior reasoning.
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:31:51 UTC No. 16132978
>>16132928
>You're wrong
Asserting so doesn't make it so.
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:07:52 UTC No. 16133006
>>16132978
You failed to understand the explanation. What do you want me to do about it? Build a time machine and go back to before you got brain damage? You've got everything you need to learn on your own. Why should I waste my time trying to make you learn?
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:08:53 UTC No. 16133007
>>16132941
Gigacope
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:27:09 UTC No. 16133499
>>16133006
Yet here you are, wasting your time while we chuckle at you. lol.
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:46:49 UTC No. 16133543
>>16133499
>I was being retarded on purpose
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:55:33 UTC No. 16133555
>>16133543
Cope all you like. I just like wasting your time and having a giggle at "so serious" dumbasses like you.
This is me
>>16132472
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:58:33 UTC No. 16133560
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Apr 2024 01:59:21 UTC No. 16133908
>>16133560
+15 points for me!
lol, racking them up!
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Apr 2024 02:04:22 UTC No. 16133914
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:34:31 UTC No. 16134099
>>16105956
Check out europe dumdum
Beggining of april blossem everywhere
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:37:26 UTC No. 16134490
>>16133914
Seethe
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:38:27 UTC No. 16134493
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:41:38 UTC No. 16134781
>>16105956
well, about 10 years or so of precocious flower blooming in the winter where I live and in many other places on earth proves it does. there are literally billions of witnesses to this phenomenon. are you living under a rock? You need to go out to nature more often
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Apr 2024 23:03:10 UTC No. 16135201
>>16134781
that never happened
Anonymous at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 20:57:22 UTC No. 16136404
>>16135201
>"where I live"
>never mentions where so that their lie can never be disproved
Anonymous at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 23:03:25 UTC No. 16136602
>>16135201
>>16136404
It's happening globally. Here's the data for when Kyoto's Sakura trees have been blossoming.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 20 Apr 2024 22:47:47 UTC No. 16137952
>>16136602
>its gotten warmer since the end of the little ice age
>that means global warming is real
Anonymous at Sat, 20 Apr 2024 22:49:12 UTC No. 16137955
>>16137952
That is a graph of the climate of Europe.
Anonymous at Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:51:59 UTC No. 16138049
Anonymous at Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:34:51 UTC No. 16138986
>>16137955
>source: michael mann
Anonymous at Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:39:49 UTC No. 16138992
>>16138986
What's your source? Twitter and funnyjunk?
Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:24:47 UTC No. 16139660
>>16118438
that's not catastrophic sea level rise, yet.
Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 04:41:28 UTC No. 16139886
>>16139660
>two weeks
Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 23:42:37 UTC No. 16141353
>>16139660
sea level is receding
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:46:17 UTC No. 16141410
if anthropogenic climate change is the primary threat to life of earth then a total countervalue exchange of thermonuclear weapons is the most logical remedy
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 01:22:35 UTC No. 16141455
>>16105966
We will be under over 9000 miles of water, six trillion jews will die, and is all your fault.
Kill yourself right now.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 01:24:40 UTC No. 16141458
>>16105966
We will be under 9000+ miles of water, six trillion jews will die, and is all your fault.
Kill yourself right now.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 01:27:43 UTC No. 16141461
>>16134781
Meh, like I care. Just evolve gills or something.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 22:25:12 UTC No. 16142779
>>16141458
>six trillion jews will die
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:03:14 UTC No. 16143378
>>16105966
It's called variability and it's natural. Every year is different.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 07:16:53 UTC No. 16143448
Cherry blossoms are 15 days late:
Climate change.
Cb:s are 15 days early: Global warming.
Cb:s are on time: Human Actions Give Cherry Blossoms Climate Anxiety And They Have To Bloom On Time Without Natural Variability
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:33:00 UTC No. 16143808
>>16143448
See
>>16136602
You seem to think science is about interpreting single data points.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 00:32:08 UTC No. 16144557
>>16136602
>it got warmer after the little ice age ended
shocking
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 01:45:07 UTC No. 16144620
>>16144557
That was a local event and it is not reflected in the Sakura blossom data.
See >>16137955
The little ice age lasts from about 1400 to about 1700. Sakuras blossom slightly earlier until about 1550, but the trends do not match >>16136602
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 01:46:08 UTC No. 16144622
>>16144620
>Sakuras blossom slightly later from 1400 until about 1550*
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 20:50:03 UTC No. 16145806
>>16144620
>That was a local event
No it wasn't, it occurred in Japan same as in the rest of the world
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 01:50:09 UTC No. 16146214
>>16145806
No it didn't and that PDF doesn't prove that it did. If it had then why isn't it reflected in the Sakura blossom data?
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 23:19:54 UTC No. 16147562
>>16146214
It is
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 10:54:33 UTC No. 16148288
>>16145806
Good paper
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 14:03:39 UTC No. 16148478
>>16147562
Try again.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 23:28:13 UTC No. 16149169
>>16105956
Its been very cold this spring where I live too, we even had snow last week
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 22:48:44 UTC No. 16150684
>>16149169
>snow in April
do you live in greenland?
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Apr 2024 21:43:02 UTC No. 16152240
>>16150684
No, this was in Central Europe
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Apr 2024 19:15:59 UTC No. 16153590
>>16141353
yep
Anonymous at Wed, 1 May 2024 19:25:12 UTC No. 16155179
>>16153590
>>16141353
that good news tho
Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 06:35:37 UTC No. 16156037
>>16155179
No it isn't, if sea level continues to go down at this rate eventually the oceans will dry up completely
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 00:18:32 UTC No. 16157104
hey look the 20th climate change thread
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 19:39:47 UTC No. 16158114
>>16157103
No, thats caused by immigrants
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 07:24:09 UTC No. 16158657
Anonymous at Sun, 5 May 2024 05:28:52 UTC No. 16160178
>>16158114
Immigrants are turning Japan into a shithole, just like everywhere else, shitskins show up, demand gibes and then spend all their copious free time ruining life for their host nation while the native population has to work to pay for the gibes
Anonymous at Sun, 5 May 2024 05:56:01 UTC No. 16160203
>>16126076
Woah you sure convinced me!
I guess I gotta buy $DOGE
Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 04:33:24 UTC No. 16161720
>>16160178
If immigrants are so wonderful, how come nobody wanted them around where they were born?
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 05:06:49 UTC No. 16161743
>>16157104
is there a problem? maybe you'd rather discuss palestine?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8AHk
Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 19:37:08 UTC No. 16162765
>>16161743
great would, so would her kike friends
Anonymous at Tue, 7 May 2024 03:13:32 UTC No. 16163432
Anonymous at Tue, 7 May 2024 18:29:51 UTC No. 16164319
>>16105956
yooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo *wood clapping*
Anonymous at Wed, 8 May 2024 04:00:29 UTC No. 16165206
>>16163432
based
>>16162765
cringe
Anonymous at Wed, 8 May 2024 20:35:33 UTC No. 16166317
>>16163432
If Germany is a democracy and the majority there don't want immigration then why does Germany have so much immigration?
Is democracy just a big lie and governments aren't legitimately controlled by majority rule?
Cult of Passion at Wed, 8 May 2024 20:36:12 UTC No. 16166319
I ground a hole where my soul used to be.
I win.
[double bicep flex]
Anonymous at Wed, 8 May 2024 20:37:44 UTC No. 16166327
>>16166317
Democracy doesn't mean anything.
Cult of Passion at Wed, 8 May 2024 20:38:57 UTC No. 16166330
I need to be ready at ALL times.
Verification not required.
Cult of Passion at Wed, 8 May 2024 20:42:04 UTC No. 16166334
Behold, HueMan-ity.
Cult of Passion at Wed, 8 May 2024 20:43:45 UTC No. 16166336
Youre neither a Geneticist, Evolutionary Biologist, Psychologist of Cognitive Researcher.
What are (You), Sam?
Anonymous at Thu, 9 May 2024 05:32:47 UTC No. 16166875
>>16166317
vote counts are easily faked now, all thanks to science.
Anonymous at Thu, 9 May 2024 20:04:17 UTC No. 16167878
>>16144557
They wouldn't need to constantly reuse that same trick if global warming was real
Anonymous at Fri, 10 May 2024 05:13:36 UTC No. 16168557
>>16167878
they'd also be to think up new lies if they weren't low iq
Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 16:41:01 UTC No. 16170944
>>16169752
Michael Mann is jewish
John Clauser is Germanic and Christian
Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 17:49:32 UTC No. 16171040
>>16125265
Never thought about it like that but yeah you're right.
Before 1950, aka when the US started exporting their economic model around the world and consumption started to skyrocket, the man-made CO2 emission were kind of low.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 05:21:35 UTC No. 16171868
>>16125265
Right, that proves that the trend is related to the end of the little ice age
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 23:53:54 UTC No. 16173034
>>16171040
meanwhile the warmest period recorded in the modern temperature records was the 1930s, which predates the inflection point on that chart by a couple decades.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 13:30:02 UTC No. 16173878
>>16173034
>warmest period recorded in the modern temperature records was the 1930s,
Lol no.
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 17:50:18 UTC No. 16174202
>>16173034
How do global warming shills explain this?
Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 05:34:47 UTC No. 16175045
>>16173034
>the warmest period recorded in the modern temperature records was the 1930s,
NASA wouldn't have had to edit their temperature records to create the false appearance of global warming if that was not the case
Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 06:03:13 UTC No. 16175081
>>16174202
Can you provide a source?
Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 21:41:58 UTC No. 16176172
>>16156037
>if sea level continues to go down at this rate eventually the oceans will dry up completely.
its free real estate
Anonymous at Wed, 15 May 2024 09:12:13 UTC No. 16176851
>>16169752
excellent pic
Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 00:13:11 UTC No. 16177697
>>16175045
>NASA