Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 20:09:04 UTC No. 16106685

>oy vey the world is coming to an end!!!
>muh soiyence says so!!!
this is always a lie, it always has been in the past and it always will be in the future

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 20:13:07 UTC No. 16106692

>>16106685
Yes probably, but such specific data should be "easy" to check for someone who has access to some kind of orbital simulator and telescope, no?

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 20:27:06 UTC No. 16106714

>>16106685
he's trying to make sense of those numbers. if he were making an appeal to "muh soiyence", he would post that the world is going to end.

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 20:28:36 UTC No. 16106719

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_elements
i would look into this, i guess

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 21:15:03 UTC No. 16106797

>>16106675
so post what the knowledgeable person said (you won't)

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 21:22:28 UTC No. 16106808

can someone plot this orbit, maybe in some kind of software?

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 21:24:09 UTC No. 16106809

Means nothing. I fucking hate wannabe "I am so le nerd guize" retards. If they're intelligent enough to understand their own cryptic bs, why not post exactly what they mean.

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 21:27:33 UTC No. 16106815

>>16106809
its just these https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_elements
it doesn't seem cryptic or meaningless at all, just possibly useless.

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 21:31:08 UTC No. 16106823

>>16106815
Yeah that much is clear that these are orbit parameters. What I was talking about was
>Claiming something was going to impact earth on Apr 8
and how did they get that date data etc

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 21:34:24 UTC No. 16106829

>>16106823
yeah context would be nice, and i've seen a lot of the sort of thing you're talking about.
i'm mainly curious whether the claim could be confirmed/disproved using just the orbit parameters and some sort of online tool, or another method.

Anonymous at Sun, 31 Mar 2024 21:41:42 UTC No. 16106838

>>16106675
Would be good to know the mass. picrel is the simulation for the given parameters from cneos: https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/tools/orbit_diagram.html

Please check if I made a mistake.

Orbital period is 63000 years.
Earth is the green (not turqoise) planet directly beneath the sun.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 04:08:33 UTC No. 16107313

>>16106838
Thank you! From what I understand this wouldn't be on the same path as earth, correct? Don't know mass, but around 800m wide.

For the context it's probably just some larper larping being an insider, just quite specified larp so wanted to ask

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 04:26:51 UTC No. 16107330

>>16106838
When I entered the OP's data I got something that impacts Mars.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 04:28:30 UTC No. 16107332

>>16106838
Does mean distance really equal perihelion?

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 04:44:55 UTC No. 16107349

>>16106838
>>16107330
Hmm, why so different?

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 12:28:12 UTC No. 16107672

>>16106838
is assuming the Mean Distance is in AU (1au = 1 Earth orbital radius). Which makes sense, but at that distance it's never going to be anywhere near us. Also, the inclination looks like you're assuming it's in radians, but the numbers for ascending node/arg. of perigee/anomaly all make more sense as degrees, and so inclination is probably also degrees.
>>16107330
is just retarded, as that orbit clearly doesn't have an Eccentricity of ~1.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 16:56:49 UTC No. 16107956

>>16106838
Close enough

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 04:39:56 UTC No. 16108787

>>16106675
here I ran its trajectory and here's the path it's going to take

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 06:25:14 UTC No. 16108900

>>16106675
allergic to units of measurement you are.