Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 18:55:33 UTC No. 16108060

>>16108048
this thread is not very good

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 19:16:38 UTC No. 16108096

>>16108060
this entire board is not very good

The moment it became normalized to post a screenshot of an article with no source or explanation it went downhill fast.
It's like clickbait but without the bait. It panders to the lowest dredges of 4chan who can't even bother to read more than 1 headline sentence. It fosters the spread of misinformation and propoganda, and in fact the normalization of headlines such as this was likely intentionally done by forces that wish to spread propaganda. And it has become the norm here. Worst of all.... nobody would even dare questions doing and if I pose the question it'll just be ignored.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 19:23:49 UTC No. 16108120

>>16108096
/sci/ is ironically enough lower iq than /fit/ these days/ what a world where meatheads show better scientific rigor than /sci/

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 19:31:35 UTC No. 16108131

>>16108096
>>16108120
>i hate /sci/
>i hate 4chan
why are you here?

>this board that i contribute to sucks balls
>its everyone else's fault except my own
>i'm a super perfect unique special snowflake, i'm infallible

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:01:54 UTC No. 16108176

>>16108131
>offer constructive criticism
>receive projections of inferiority complex

I've been here since 2007. I seen what this board can be, and hope to see it again someday.
Right not it functions as a /pol/-alternative because /pol/ is too intolerable even for themselves, but unfortunately anons brought along much of the baggage that brought /pol/ down to it's knees.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:03:58 UTC No. 16108179

>>16108131
You think this kind of thread is good?

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:49:06 UTC No. 16108259

>>16108048
>Carlos Eire
>>>/his/