Image not available

1036x1539

DEI is bad for bu....jpg

🧡 New academic fraud in the sciences discovered

Anonymous No. 16108099

The discovery of this fraud has also ironically resulted in some genuine science being accomplished

Anonymous No. 16108161

>>16108099
>suggests that...
Suggests that what? Seems like the important part was cut off

Image not available

1x1

fake news.pdf

Anonymous No. 16108288

heres a copy of the article that was debunked, its important to note in reading this that all of the data in the article was produced fraudulently with the intention of "proving" the conclusions reached by the authors. they needed to falsify their data because the real data proves that the opposite of what is claimed in the paper is true

Anonymous No. 16108343

>>16108099
BlackRock is already moving on from ESG. If it doesn't actually make money, even after forcing it, they eventually have to give it up.

Anonymous No. 16108346

>>16108343
you're wrong in assuming they do this for money, they do this because they are evil and worship demons. I'll go back to /x/ now.

Anonymous No. 16108348

>>16108343 (me)
also, skimming >>16108288
anyone with more than 5 seconds of experience in financial markets can tell you that 20% probability outperformance gain from a single factor like diversity is either miscomputed, misrepresented, or not causal and mostly just correlation. For example, their top outperforming companies are more likely to be the giants consistently doing well so they can hire more non-essential people, which they use to fill out ESG/DEI scores for brownie points or other reasons

Anonymous No. 16108358

>>16108343
Yeah a few more dollars and they'll collapse and your tax dollars and banking system will be back and better than ever.

Anonymous No. 16108404

>>16108099
DEI is a weapon meant to induce incompetency and thereby weaken the west before WW3.

Anonymous No. 16108896

>>16108348
If diversity has such a massive advantage in finance then why are all of the major financial bosses jewish?

Anonymous No. 16109945

>>16108896
That doesn't seem very diverse to me

Anonymous No. 16111109

>>16108404
It also allows intentional sabotage to be easily disguised as a dumb mistake by an incompetent

Anonymous No. 16111594

>>16108343
>BlackRock is already moving on from ESG.
No they aren't, they might be saying they are, but that doesn't make it true

Anonymous No. 16112729

>>16111594
They already rebranded ESG as DEI a year or so ago, they'll just come up with another new name for the same old white genocide schemes

Anonymous No. 16113422

>>16111594
Larry Fink and his ilk aren't about to give up on their 150+ year old white genocide campaign just because of one minor setback.

Anonymous No. 16113440

>>16108099
It may decrease overall performance but it's good for stakeholders and corporate managers

Anonymous No. 16113500

>>16108099
No surprise. Anybody with a brain could debunk their claims without even looking at any data.
Even if you grant their data was legit, it only observes correlation.
They took this correlation and sold everybody the causation:
diversity -> better performance

With a few brain cells, one could simply posit the causation was really:
better performance -> diversity
That is, companies that are succeeding can afford to waste more money on useless diversity ornaments. Which is really the case found in OP's linked paper.

This pattern of taking a correlation then selling everyone the wrong causation is EVERYWHERE.

Anonymous No. 16113743

>>16108343
>If it doesn't actually make money, even after forcing it, they eventually have to give it up.
Blackrock doesnt do it for money but theres a limit, gross mismanagement cant continue for long

Anonymous No. 16113765

>>16108343
>forcing non-productive race-hires into positions they have no right to be in ends up costing companies billions of dollars due to depressed productivity and reduced company morale, as well as creating conditions for a brain-drain as useful employees are fired to make way for non-useful replacements
Who could have thought

Anonymous No. 16113851

>>16108343
You're wrong. They're just rebranding it under a different name.

Anonymous No. 16113856

>>16113851
what's the new name?

Anonymous No. 16114847

>>16108099
Wow, more fraudulent publications from the so-called scientific community?? Absolutely shocking and unexpected

Anonymous No. 16114853

>>16108161
>this suggests that…
The guberment needs patriotic yt boys to enlist

Image not available

640x427

camacho.jpg

Anonymous No. 16116476

>>16113765

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16117731

>>16108099
another one?
its beginning to seem like academics don't do anything other than spread lies

Anonymous No. 16118413

>>16117731
it been "beginning" to seem like that for over half a century already

Anonymous No. 16118798

>>16112729
>rebranded ESG as DEI
What's the deal with that? Why?

πŸ—‘οΈ bodhi No. 16119166

>>16108288
(((green)))
every time

πŸ—‘οΈ bodhi No. 16119173

>>16112729
nah they dropped dei, they call it bridge now

πŸ—‘οΈ bodhi No. 16119179

>>16113856
B.R.I.D.G.E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdCLEQ-z6QY

Anonymous No. 16120113

>>16119179
>B.R.I.D.G.E
>Building relationships, inclusivity, diversity and greater equity
It just keeps going...

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16120565

>>16114847
This has never happened before !!!!

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16121644

>>16119179
The jews will never give up on their white genocide plan, the only way to end their scheming will be to wipe them out

Image not available

2133x1216

HowJewsOperate.png

πŸ—‘οΈ bodhi No. 16121660

>>16121644

Anonymous No. 16122973

>>16121660
what'd I miss?

Anonymous No. 16122985

James Lindsay was talking about this in 2019, he and his colleagues LITERALLY wrote comically fake papers intentionally, and many of them passed peer review

Anonymous No. 16123713

>>16122985
So the right was correct about something that the left denied to be true only for time to reveal it to be true anyway?

Image not available

1088x1081

AAXtN0.jpg

Anonymous No. 16124640

Anonymous No. 16124836

>>16124640
Misogynoir.