Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 19:32:37 UTC No. 16108134

>>16108126
Why do huwhite people have occipital bun bumps and nogs don't? Speciation perhaps?

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 19:38:44 UTC No. 16108141

>>16108126
Already unbunked
>The Oldest Stone Tools Yet Discovered Are Unearthed in Kenya
>3.3 million-year-old artifacts predate the human genus
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/oldest-known-stone-tools-unearthed-kenya-180955341/

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 19:41:31 UTC No. 16108145

>>16108126
>>16108141
These are both just random fucking rocks, I find stone tools along the railroad tracks every day

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 19:49:34 UTC No. 16108154

>>16108126
>find random rocks that look funny
>must be tools used by humans 3 millions year ago
those disciplines are retarded and shouldn't be considered "sciences"

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 19:58:25 UTC No. 16108169

>>16108134
Species has to do with whether animals can consistently produce fertile offspring, not whether they have exactly the same bone structure

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:01:24 UTC No. 16108174

>>16108126
why does whitey get so triggered over the idea that his great^20,000 grandpa was a monke in africa and not a monke in europe

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:04:26 UTC No. 16108180

>>16108169
Someone will reply to you with a pic of almost identical animals who are not considered the same species but they probably could breed amonst themselves. But there's an obvious counter example to that: dogs, if very widely different breeds are part of the same species, then it's not out of question that sub saharian africans and europeans and east asians are all humans.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:05:20 UTC No. 16108181

>>16108180
Yes, pitbulls and shepherds are both dogs, but pitbulls are not shepherds

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:05:40 UTC No. 16108184

>>16108174
Because this claim could be used to further some political agendas today, like almost all science really.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:13:10 UTC No. 16108190

>>16108169
So polar bears and grizzly bears are the same species?
Wolves and coyotes are the same species?

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:13:36 UTC No. 16108191

>>16108169
>lions and tigers are the same species

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:14:30 UTC No. 16108193

>>16108169
Then how do dogs and wolves produce fertile wolf dogs?

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:15:03 UTC No. 16108194

>>16108145
holy based humans came from railroads confirmed
Also in general I don't trust soientists anyways
I won't believe this shit until a mathematicians proves it

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:17:27 UTC No. 16108204

>>16108191
They cant breed a fertile offspring, "Liger" are sterile

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:26:59 UTC No. 16108220

>>16108204
Then why are female ligers fertile?

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:34:58 UTC No. 16108233

>>16108169
This is not actually established science. Speciation before Darwin, which is when the species framework was created, was about whether two varieties were considered “created separately” which essentially boiled down to several characteristics, including location, behavior, visual qualities, mutual fertility, and the preservation of characteristics upon mixing.

It’s never actually been changed. To this day, species are differentiated based on these characteristics, which originated from a unified coherent view of “created species”. Today there’s not really a coherent definition of speciation, and this was essentially Darwin’s main argument in Orgin of Species — that species are arbitrary and animals are related on a spectrum created by common descent.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:43:58 UTC No. 16108247

>>16108141
>smithsonian
:^)

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:45:47 UTC No. 16108252

>all 29 different species of anemonefish are mutually fertile

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:49:50 UTC No. 16108262

>>16108233
Rare to encounter someone has actually read On the Origin of Species. Chapeau, anon

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:53:04 UTC No. 16108270

>>16108262
Chapeau bas*

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:53:27 UTC No. 16108272

>>16108233
>boiled down to several characteristics, including location, behavior, visual qualities, mutual fertility, and the preservation of characteristics upon mixing.
negroes and whites are distinct, separate species by that standard, so why does science insist on saying that negroes and whites are the same species?

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:55:11 UTC No. 16108274

>>16108272
It’s arbitrarily weighted designation. You can just decide whatever you want essentially. That’s the whole point

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 21:06:10 UTC No. 16108290

>>16108274
Could you tell me where he wrote down his arguments? I am very interested in this topic. Thanks in advance.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 21:09:05 UTC No. 16108294

>>16108290
Darwin’s On the Origin of Species. It’s not a very difficult read.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 21:41:25 UTC No. 16108335

>>16108180
>if very widely different breeds are part of the same species, then
There are breed pairings which, without c-sections, are 100% fatal no puppies due to size difference ie great dane father chihuahua mother can't happen.
If we encountered them in the wild we would identify them as commonly descent but incompatible for breeding

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 21:52:23 UTC No. 16108349

>>16108220
Uh well...because, uh...

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 22:06:01 UTC No. 16108378

>>16108272
Humanity was declared to be a single species by the UN in November of 1945, there is no scientific basis for the idea.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Apr 2024 23:42:15 UTC No. 16108507

>>16108126
Anon homo sapiens didn't even exist 1 million years ago. We already know that other homos/homo ancestors left Africa before sapiens because they were there when sapiens arrived, e.g. neanderthals.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 00:11:25 UTC No. 16108547

>>16108507
How come Africans are mutually fertile with chimpanzees and no other subspecies of humans are? If humans all evolved in Africa then that mutual fertility with chimpanzees should be universal.
How come Africans are the only subspecies of humans with curly hair, why does the rest of humanity have straight hair? Why did native Americans evolve in Africa, cross the Bering land bridge, move back to the tropics and never redevelop curly hair?

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 03:18:04 UTC No. 16108733

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 04:58:07 UTC No. 16108802

>>16108220
Females are often sterile, males are always sterile. These are defects from hybridisation. Almost all humans can produce fertile males and females

bodhi at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 05:00:23 UTC No. 16108803

>>16108126
I said OOA was propaganda trash years ago here and was attacked by retards endlessly

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 05:10:57 UTC No. 16108817

>>16108233
Yes that's when trying to categorize all life into various species. I was talking about biospecies, where animals are categorized into species related to interbreeding capability. As opposed to agamospecies or ecospecies etc. But when talking about species generally its usually referring to biospecies, which is why dictionary definitions and so on will define species as the ability to interbreed

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 05:13:58 UTC No. 16108820

>>16108547
is this bait or something?

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 06:40:04 UTC No. 16108914

>>16108802
Racial Pairings and Fertility: Do Interracial Couples Have Fewer Children?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8274554/
>Fertility is lower among interracial couples than among their endogamous counterparts

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:20:00 UTC No. 16109505

>>16108914
Pretty much proves that humans aren't all one species

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:27:43 UTC No. 16109516

>>16108184
why is it not that the most obvious implication of out-of-africa would be that the area's current inhabitants (black africans) are likely less evolved, aka more similar to our primate ancestors, than europeans/asians/etc who faced more evolutionary pressure to adapt and become smarter/better homo sapiens?