Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 03:20:53 UTC No. 16110064

none of those. but maybe some weird mix of a few of them

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 03:26:39 UTC No. 16110074

Miyazaki would probably be most comfy.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 03:27:42 UTC No. 16110076

>>16110058
What does any of that nonsense even mean

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 03:31:00 UTC No. 16110079

>>16110058
Is the vertical axis supposed to represent the level of socialization? The current names are unhelpful.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 03:37:06 UTC No. 16110085

>>16110058
Whichever destroys all technology forever.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 03:58:25 UTC No. 16110109

>>16110079
I think it's meant to represent human dominance versus our environment. Going up leads to humans being more autonomous and in control of their lives/society, while going down you're letting the automation, entropy, or higher powers take over.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 03:59:59 UTC No. 16110110

>>16110085
So basically the left of the graph

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 04:06:03 UTC No. 16110116

>>16110058
Eco-fascist, most likely.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 04:09:38 UTC No. 16110120

>>16110058
Which ever one lets me be a big tiddy anime girl

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 04:15:07 UTC No. 16110124

>>16110109
>human dominance versus our environment
If you mean humanity as a collective species (as your next sentence seems to imply), then that's just our level of technological progress, which would be the horizontal axis if anything. Automation is, essentially by definition, the subjugation of our environmental resources to human innovations.

Unless your definition of environment goes beyond the natural to include social institutions, like the economy, the financial system, and social media. In which case, the level of control you describe is consistent with the socialization interpretation, because the top has humans being well-integrated into these social institutions, while the bottom has them resisting it.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 04:29:29 UTC No. 16110135

>>16110124
I suppose you're right when you put it like that. You can label the top part of the vertical axis "for the greater good", while the lower part "every man for himself"

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 04:37:29 UTC No. 16110139

>>16110135
In all honesty, I suspect that OP just wants to post the classic political compass, but had to give it a paper-thin futuristic disguise to keep it from getting deleted.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 04:50:17 UTC No. 16110149

>>16110058
Interplanetary Technofascist Manifest Galaxy
Humanity must outnumber the stars.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 05:02:13 UTC No. 16110154

>>16110058
All these seem pointless in a way. I mean, Eco? Fuck no. Nihilistic? Fuck no.

Planetary? Are you kidding me? Interstellar at minimum, intergalactic sounds much better. Fuck the casuality limits, I'm sure we figure something out, not so long ago no one believed we can fly.

But definitely closing ourselves in the virtual worlds sounds like a very virgin thing to do and I think we should rather be the chads of the Universe, bringing beacon of the civilization everywhere, yes you heard me right fuck your prime directive.

Imagine us descending in the most fancy spaceship that the laws of physics allow, changing the color of a moon to a disco ball or some shit. Fuck yeah. And then casually building gigachad AI, Dyson Sphere and announcing that their resource problems are over.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 05:11:23 UTC No. 16110157

>>16110058
I am leaning towards mining singularity?

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 05:19:03 UTC No. 16110164

>>16110058
>Which way, /sci/?

Honestly, my personal bias is broad approval of really anything that leads us towards, or otherwise contributes to our expanding understanding of ecology, terraforming, biome construction, and genetic engineering.

I never grew out of my childish veneration for dinosaurs and ice-age animals. I know the vast majority of those "clone extinct animals" or "send us your dna so we can tell you what race you are : )" tech-start-ups are just bullshit scams, but I still kinda love them.
I'm also the kind of man who instead of Rome; thinks about Biosphere 2, several times a week. Really amazing atmospheric and air-conditioning system, genuinely ground breaking stuff, but the actual ecological experiment and management were all complete dogshit. So much of the work the people they locked in there for a year was basically horticulture and lawn-care because nothing was self-sustaining. They literally never even kept written records of what fauna they stocked the fucking Biosphere with. The 'biomes' they installed in there weren't even serious ecological experiments, but mostly just decorative gardens. It was just such an endlessly fascinating mess and I'd kill to have them do another one, but taken seriously.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 05:29:14 UTC No. 16110170

Eternal Y2k cultural time-trap forever is clearly the best option. Even the Matrix acknowledged that 1999 was the peak of human advancement, 2000 isn't far off.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 05:50:54 UTC No. 16110184

>>16110170
Fuck, that's an indisputable point

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 06:47:30 UTC No. 16110265

>>16110184
Either that or a total nihilistic un-singularity sounds good.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 07:28:55 UTC No. 16110298

>>16110139
no, future compasses are just neat

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 10:16:43 UTC No. 16110443

>>16110058
I just want to grill, for crying out loud!

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 12:46:18 UTC No. 16110585

>>16110298
fully automated luxury ruralism + cybernetic neo-predator mind transfer

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 17:03:55 UTC No. 16110832

>>16110058
All of these make me feel depressed. It's like the end of time.
>>16110298
This one isn't as bad.
Interplanetary arcology monumentalism actually seems cool.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 21:12:52 UTC No. 16111120

cybernetic sex slime transcendence reporting in.
>>16110120
right here, soldier.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 21:15:29 UTC No. 16111122

>>16110298
post more plz

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 21:19:42 UTC No. 16111129

>>16110298
I'm thinking post mortality gamer technarchy

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 17:22:02 UTC No. 16112249

>>16110170
Even the Matrix?! It is an indisputable fact

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 06:58:26 UTC No. 16113246

>>16110058
Back to /pol/

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 06:59:36 UTC No. 16113249

>>16112249
Would you rather have an eternal March 2020 time trap forever?

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 07:03:50 UTC No. 16113258

>>16111122

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 10:38:50 UTC No. 16113488

>>16113258
>centrally planned recreational pseudo-crisis
comfy

bodhi at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 11:05:18 UTC No. 16113505

>>16110058
warhammer 40k interplanetary technofascism

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 14:06:12 UTC No. 16113694

>>16113258
lame, other two are way cooler

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 14:35:32 UTC No. 16113726

>>16110058
the border between technofascist manifest galaxy and miyazaki patchwork

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:04:59 UTC No. 16113766

>>16113694
the original few spawned a subreddit /r/futurecompasses but it's mostly spammed by one guy who seems to have the goal of coupling as many esoteric political descriptors together as possible to make it seem cool and schizo

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:33:46 UTC No. 16113788

>>16110058
One of these three. I mostly wnt to be left alone... could be difficult under facist rule but facist are better then anything thats ruling over us now and maybe I even will like it.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:54:32 UTC No. 16113809

>>16113258
we need variety. I'd oscillate between top left and bottom right

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 16:07:07 UTC No. 16113821

>>16110058
what's the gayest choice?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jyPwh4Xaaihj/

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:39:50 UTC No. 16114072

DECELS ARE SUBHUMANS
I REPEAT
DECELS ARE SUBHUMANS

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:44:16 UTC No. 16114082

>>16114072
I haven't hacked you bro.