🧵 Where are they???
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Apr 2024 20:55:40 UTC No. 16111096
That shit should be everywhere!
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 13:26:40 UTC No. 16111997
>>16111096
it doesnt exist. all it takes is for the calculations to be slightly out.
science BTFO
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 13:31:35 UTC No. 16111999
>>16111096
is this "Dark Energy" in the room with us now?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:18:30 UTC No. 16112328
>>16111096
theory of the day in order to make sense = the theory + dark energy
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:20:27 UTC No. 16112332
>>16111096
in your anus
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:24:50 UTC No. 16112337
what does dark energy mean? like "dark" photons or smth?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:26:55 UTC No. 16112338
>>16111096
Elon Musk already debunked dark matter and dark energy chud
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:39:42 UTC No. 16112351
>>16112337
Repulsive force that makes the universe expand faster.
>what is it actually
We just don't know.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:46:24 UTC No. 16112358
>>16111096
Dark matter/energy is just the gravitational field
>>16112351
The universe isn't expanding, the energy transfer within the electromagnetic field is not 100% just like with everything else
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:53:10 UTC No. 16112362
>>16112351
>>16112358
how do scientists differentiate dark matter from dark energy?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:54:30 UTC No. 16112364
>>16111096
> That shit should be everywhere!
It is. However Dark Energy is incredibly weak, so weak that is only on the scale of the universe that it amounts to anything measurable.
As far Dark Matter, assuming it is particles, then it's called 'dark' because it does not interact with light or the electromagnetic force. That means it does not collide with normal matter or clump up like that does. It's a diffuse gas that surrounds the galaxy. So while there may be a few dark matter particles around you right now because they don't interact with anything we can't measure them either.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 18:58:37 UTC No. 16112367
>>16112362
DM = clumpy*, attractive
DE = uniform, repulsive
*less clumpy than visible matter tho
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 19:04:03 UTC No. 16112372
>>16112367
interesting. so like dark matter has gravitational effects on normal matter?
also no dark matter black holes possible? how would we know any blackhole we see is dark matter blackhole or normal matter blackhole?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 20:07:06 UTC No. 16112442
>>16112372
In the standard scenario it is just some unknown species of matter, with the same gravitational interaction. It's surprising how just adding mass without pressure matches cosmological data so well.
Dark matter coukd be captured by black holes. It's unlikely that DM alone could form black holes, because without cooking and pressure it cannot collapse to dense objects (in the particle scenario). If there were black holes made out of DM they wouldn't be any different to normal ones.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 20:10:00 UTC No. 16112447
>>16112442
so basically any blackhole can have an unknown mix of the two?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Apr 2024 20:58:35 UTC No. 16112535
>>16111096
It's horseshit, its data pulled out of asses. Nevermind the fact that we only know visible Universe so every number we put on what Universe is made of is a fairy tale at best (it doesn't have to be same everywhere), but vomiting these numbers without knowing shit about dark matter and energy is just embarrasing.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 00:08:01 UTC No. 16112789
The green part (atomic matter) is 99.9% strong interaction. You understand that, right anon?
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 00:11:49 UTC No. 16112791
>>16111997
>science BTFO
Cosmology is not science.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 02:34:41 UTC No. 16112992
>>16111096
It's an error in the model, not a real thing, it means the model simply doesn't work. Also, relativity has already been disproven by modern Sagnac experiments. It's embarrassing that the establishment is still holding onto this model.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 03:11:01 UTC No. 16113034
Dark matter will be a whole new table of particles that only interact with us gravitationally. No EM, Strong, or weak coupling at all. It will have its own set of fundamental forces.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 03:13:30 UTC No. 16113037
>>16112337
In relativity, the geometry of the universe is determined by its energy content. The universe is rapidly expanding at an accelerating rate. Working backwards from the observation to the energy density you need suggests a metric fuckton more energy than we currently know about just estimating all the particle interactions.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 03:15:29 UTC No. 16113038
>>16112430
But isnt that how all science is done?
>Hey guys, I looked at all the stuff I know and I think tje answer is 2.
>Well I just measured it and its 3.
>Damn, I guess I missed something.
Why is that bad?