🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 03:19:38 UTC No. 16113043
>Black holes have gravity so dense not even light can expect
>Oh, and they can be charged and produce an electric field
>Even though the carrier of the electric field is the photon...which can't escape the black hole
Do physicists know they are just spouting bullshit, or do they just not think this stuff. At least most social scientists know they are just dishonest idealogues. Sometimes I get the feeling the physcists are just honest retards.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 03:23:15 UTC No. 16113048
>>16113043
light is a waves, waves can eminate from Black holes without light escapting, like waves eminating from the ocean
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 03:39:34 UTC No. 16113073
>>16113043
A person stupid enough not to understand the basics of electrostatics accuses physicists of being stupid. Go back to your highschool textbooks and read the definition of an electric field and how it is created.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 04:48:10 UTC No. 16113143
>>16113043
photons do not carry charge you fucking idiot
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 05:18:52 UTC No. 16113157
>>16113043
they have large but finite gravity wells
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 06:53:24 UTC No. 16113234
>>16113048
I've never seen a wave outside the ocean.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 06:55:09 UTC No. 16113237
>>16113043
Both you and BH theory are retarded, but in different ways.
Tired personally of fuckwits, including crippled ones, talking about mechanisms beyond their ability of proper grasp like BH evaporation/entropy/other properties. The fact that demiurge decided to spill some know-how knowledge over jewish brains in the past century to make the bomb does not imply the ability of free theorizing on same matters.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 13:53:54 UTC No. 16113668
>>16113073
>>16113143
Retards, photon is the carrier of EM field aka mediator if the EM interaction. EM field comes from charged particles. We talking electrodynamics here not electrostatics.
>>16113234
Very good analogy.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:05:45 UTC No. 16113929
OK, explain why this is wrong: photons mediate a change of electric field, but a static electric field can be maintained without any exchange of photons. Please give sources.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:15:23 UTC No. 16113949
>>16113043
>>16113668
photons don't carry the field, they carry interactions between particles that interact with the EM field. to extend the ocean analogy you like, this is like saying the ocean is made of waves - it's a category error.
a black hole is, for this purpose, actually a lot like a particle, even when not charged - the field itself, much like spacetime, exists both inside and outside the event horizon. the horizon is a one way barrier for things that move THROUGH the fields, but not for the fields themselves. that's why they can have charge affect things outside of the horizon, and also why gravity "escapes" the horizon.
and yes, a statically charged object is an electrostatic system, and given the inertia of a black hole, a charged black hole likely represents the most electrostatic object possible.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 19:12:45 UTC No. 16114118
>>16113949
>a black hole is, for this purpose, actually a lot like a particle, even when not charged - the field itself, much like spacetime, exists both inside and outside the event horizon. the horizon is a one way barrier for things that move THROUGH the fields, but not for the fields themselves. that's why they can have charge affect things outside of the horizon, and also why gravity "escapes" the horizon.
sounds like a lot of bullshit, how then you are supposed to prove the existence of the static field?