🧵 here's the insect ancestor
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 05:59:18 UTC No. 16113188
Nerys is the non arthropod ancestor of arthropods.
It appeared 700 million years ago. It itself has never appeared on land but its descendants did.
Just LOOK AT IT it looks like a sea scorpion with a worm like body behind the sea scorpion body (meaning head, mouth parts, tentacles, everything that comes afterwards is just worm)
Worm has four eyes, spiders and scorpions have even more than that. Insects and crabs only have two! Due to insects being crabs. And centipedes have 4 eyes but they are simpler than insect and crab eyes.
>I believe the worm tentacles are what became mouth parts for advanced beings
>I also beliveve the worms "fake legs", the parapods are what became real legs, the arthropod leg
>Due to Nerys not being an arthropod yet it doesnt have arthropod legs.. sea scorpion was the first to invent such legs
Here's how it probably happened:
>worm evolves into eyrypterid, the sea scorpion
>sea scorpions evolve to crabs which are going to stay on the sea for a long time still
>some sea scorpions also move to land and evolve into spiders and scorpions
>the first true crabs of the sea (crab is different from sea scorpion by its mouth parts, they are more advanced) now move to land and become pill bugs (this was 400 million years ago?)
>pill bugs de-evolve into centipedes, land creatures that look a lot like Nerys ancestor..
>other pill bugs evolve into insects (silverfish will be the first insect) thus insects never truly were in the sea but came fron land ancestor
>in a way insects and centipedes and crabs all belong in a family
more sea-to land incursions by arthropod:
>600 million years after Nerys there is finally a coconut crab invasion on land, these crabs have very crude lungs compared to those crabs who have already been on land for hundreds of millions of years
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 06:45:44 UTC No. 16113223
>>16113188
>Just LOOK AT IT it looks like a sea scorpion
If your only reasoning is it looks like something else then you need to reconsider your theory and preferably kill yourself soon after to spare us from this
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 06:51:03 UTC No. 16113228
>>16113223
how do you then explain that fish evolved into frogs?
frogs kinda look like fish a little, especially their tadpoles look like a small goldfish (just with a different color)
they look a like, they are related
and it goes further than that
no vertebrate has EVER had more than 2 eyes
meanwhile the ragworms (supposedly related to earthworms altough they are nothing alike) have 4 eyes
its impossible that arthropods are related to fish as there do not seem to be any kind of leap possible that would turn a fish into a arthropod or the other way around
meanwhile some simple worms still contained features that could eventually turn either into a spider or into a human
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 08:25:24 UTC No. 16113370
>de-evolve
Saying shit like this should cause the ghost of Darwin to rise from his grave and ram a barnacle up your ass.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 09:56:40 UTC No. 16113454
>>16113370
how do you want to say it?
it had turned itself into a body plan that resembles its sea ancestor from hundreds of millions of years ago, only this time it lives on land but other than that its has mutated back into being very close to the original appearance
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 14:40:18 UTC No. 16113731
how does it feel to be such an organism?
Feels normal?
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 21:38:06 UTC No. 16114316
>>16113454
Evolve. The term is evolve. This isn't pokemon. Evolution only goes one way. There's a species of contagious cancer that evolved from dogs. Dogs didn't de-evolve.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Apr 2024 22:12:12 UTC No. 16114367
>>16113228
>how do you then explain that fish evolved into frogs?
Fish were not the immediate precursor to frogs, frogs are a relatively derived form of amphibian. The amphibians that first descended from fish were much more salamander-like but with less developed limbs. The relationship between fish and early amphibians has nothing to do with them looking kinda similar to tadpoles, it has to do with similarities in the teeth and bones
>frogs kinda look like fish a little, especially their tadpoles look like a small goldfish (just with a different color)
No. No they do not. You would have to be overwhelmingly retarded to think this. The earliest amphibians likely didn’t even have a proper tadpole stage
>no vertebrate has EVER had more than 2 eyes
>meanwhile the ragworms (supposedly related to earthworms altough they are nothing alike) have 4 eyes
Good thing neither ragworms nor earthworms are vertebrates then
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Apr 2024 01:38:56 UTC No. 16114603
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Apr 2024 03:35:01 UTC No. 16116364
>>16113188
They're aliens
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Apr 2024 11:02:02 UTC No. 16116679
>>16113731
>have so much sex you become the ancestor of ALL arthropods
>how does it feel?