Image not available

598x314

Screenshot 2024-0....png

🧵 Dark Matter and the Double Slit Experiment

Anonymous No. 16114432

Just want to start off by saying I dont have any formal education in the field but I was thinking about the problem of darkmatter recently in relation to the double slit experiment and it made me wonder if the two could potentially be related.
Suppose that matter on the macro scale ultimately behaved as matter on the micro scale did and as result the seemingly contradictory laws of gravity were in reality uniform; just relative to a matter perspective.
Specifically i wondered if a universal observer of the universe might increase the gravitational pull of bodies in space to each other collapsing their natural spread like observatiing light particals through a slit does giving an explanation for the excess "gravity" we se in the universe.
Be curious if any of you have any thoughts on this??

Anonymous No. 16114443

>>16114432
Observers don't influence the property of what they're observing. (You) don't make something magically change shape just by looking at it.

Anonymous No. 16114448

>>16114443
isn't that what happenss with the double slit experiment though?
I only ask because thats the whole reason i put this forward.

Anonymous No. 16114449

>>16114432
Bump for interest
But I don’t fucking know OP

Anonymous No. 16114452

>>16114448
No, the properties don't change. (You)r perception of reality is the only thing the experiment shows

Anonymous No. 16114498

>>16114448
It's not the observation that changes things, it's the use of an electron microscope.

Image not available

2000x2000

cd690997887aab223....png

Anonymous No. 16114515

Humans believe 95% of the universe is made of dark magic. They didn't know electricity until 200 years ago, they still don't know shit, even if they make up all sorts of nonsense like this to pretend they do.

Anonymous No. 16114554

>>16114432
>if the two could potentially be related
no

Anonymous No. 16114604

>>16114515
Nobody claims to know what it is though, nobody is pretending, just observing and trying to find an explanation that fits. Why does that bother you so much?

Anonymous No. 16114610

>>16114452
whats the point of the double slit experiment then?

Anonymous No. 16114896

>>16114432
>Just want to start off by saying I dont have any formal education in the field
Thank you. I wish everyone who made retarded threads on /sci/ would preface their posts with this so we can all know to disregard them immediately.

Anonymous No. 16115131

>>16114896
God I bet your mom gives you so much pussy man

Anonymous No. 16115166

>>16114610
Wave-particle duality.

Anonymous No. 16115298

>>16115166
???

Anonymous No. 16115366

>>16115298
Apparently no one /sci/ knows kek

Anonymous No. 16115413

>>16114432
>Specifically i wondered if a universal observer of the universe might increase the gravitational pull of bodies in space to each other collapsing their natural spread like observatiing light particals through a slit does giving an explanation for the excess "gravity" we se in the universe.
Who knows but no evidence suggests anything like this. This is like you asking if people can influence banal physics observations like the falling of an apple, this has never been observed and if it exists it exists at a microscopic scale thats only relevant when seeing particles at a bubble chamber, not apples or stars.
Nothing in physics is ever proven, you just have evidence to support it and theres none in this case.

Anonymous No. 16115418

>>16115298
>>16115166
>>16115366
Hes talking about the slit experiment to lift the concept of observations changing the measurements, he thinks gravity is changed when you look at a galaxy so if galazy acts weird its maybe because of the observation, wild

Anonymous No. 16115476

>>16114443
>(You) don't make something magically change shape just by looking at it.
Then why are you erect?

Anonymous No. 16115631

>>16115476
kek