Image not available

1200x594

latest[1].jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16117054

Are hypersleep pods feasible sci? Is anyone realistically working on them? I mean the type you so you don't age in.

Anonymous No. 16117058

i'd imagine this would be some highly classified DARPA research (or funded in secret by a billionaire) that they want to use for themselves and their kin.
It's fundamentally a very 'destablizing' technology - the idea that some people are able to achieve immortality and the rest of us can't.

Anonymous No. 16117072

>>16117058
I suppose that raises a good point. Would be a gamchanger for space travel though.

Anonymous No. 16117088

>>16117054
No matter how good these are, if you're in one a couple hundred years the decay of radioactive isotopes in your body will give you a lethal dose.

Anonymous No. 16117096

>>16117054
Probably wouldn't be feasible for years, but some animals undergo a form of "hypersleep" each winter, so you could realistically put people to sleep for the equivalent of several Earth months at a time followed by one month of recovery.

Anonymous No. 16117106

>>16117054
totally feasible. get your POD™ TODAY!!
https://odysee.com/@Realfake_Newsource:9/RFNS-1.21-001-010:7

Anonymous No. 16117124

>>16117054
Probably not in the scifi sense no, but people already use cryopreservation (even though they can't be woken up yet lol)

bodhi No. 16117130

>>16117054
fun fact, there are only 4 pods and a mirror to make it look like 8

Anonymous No. 16117147

There's historical mentions of humans reaching something like a mild hibernation when in polar regions. According to those writing, such people don't go into a complete sleep but during the coldest, darkest months, they move about very little, sleep most of the day, and eat very little.
But what's the point? You don't age while in hibernation? You also don't experience life either. Certainly for things like prolonged space flight or waiting out the aftermath of a cataclysmic event, there might be a use but for the average person, the uses seem limited.

Anonymous No. 16117255

>>16117054
it's kind of retarded in the grand scheme of things.
>>16117058
>It's fundamentally a very 'destablizing' technology - the idea that some people are able to achieve immortality and the rest of us can't.
that would have always been the case innit? there's no way regular people get something at the same time with people on top.

Anonymous No. 16117258

>>16117072
>Would be a gamchanger for space travel though.
no, a gamechanger for space travel is traveling as information anon. at lightspeed.

Anonymous No. 16117996

>>16117054
nope, fake and gay take your pop sci shit out of here.

Anonymous No. 16118003

>>>/lit/23257474

Anonymous No. 16118027

Suspended animation is too complex to figure out at this time, assuming it's even truly possible at all. You can't just chemically stall an object, it also needs to be deep frozen down to a level where molecular and atomic interactions are significantly slowed. All of this needs to happen in a way that causes no changes to the body, causes no detrimental effects, and is perfectly reversible.

So what this entails are some kind of liquids that are perfectly compatible, that can replace all fluid compositions in the body, that do not freeze at deep cold temperatures, that despite not becoming physically immobile also halt cellular and chemical processes without damaging anything or causing long term side effects.
Anon also made a great point about radioisotope decay buildup.

Is it in some way theoretically feasible? Yes, probably.
It is also too complicated to achieve in this century.
Again, assuming it's physcially possible to begin with, there would have to be some kind of smart nanomachine thing going on with a pod that can perfectly monitor at the cellular level, to maintain the body in a near-zero activity state.

It would probably be easier to figure out android bodies or clone replacements and brain imprinting.
To that end, it would probably then be easier to just replace the human species with robotic intelligences. Which I hope we do. These meat monkeys I'm accursed with are stifling, weak, small of mind, too simple and shallow, too attached to their emotions.

Anonymous No. 16118038

>>16117058
>>16117072
>>16117255
There's no such thing as classified research at least not in the sense you're thinking, there's no hidden sci-fi technology.
The tech you see around you today is all there's. the F-35 came out 40 years after the F-16 and it's not some sic-fi alien technology that shoots lasers, it's just a marginally better fighter jet.
That's the level you should expect from "hidden tech". Stop eating up so much sci-fi bs.

Anonymous No. 16118182

>>16117054
>so you don't age in
You just need a spaceship and enough energy to accelerate to near lightspeed and relativity takes care of the rest. You could travel millions of years into the future while barely aging if you go fast enough. I expect some billionaires will eventually try this. The only drawbacks are the energy required and the possibility of collisions with dust at relativistic speeds but those are solvable with enough cash.

Anonymous No. 16118242

>>16117054
Umm? Why would anyone work on them? You can’t make an money off the take or uncover racial inequities.

Can a /sci/ster explain what OP meant?

Anonymous No. 16118345

>>16118242
>You can’t make money
many billionaires would give their entire fortune for any workable life extension technology, especially the new-money billionaires that made their fortunes in crypto or tech

Anonymous No. 16118389

>>16118345
Woow, so a chance (that the tech materializes) at a chance (that your cells in the machine don't get exploded freezing/thawing) at a chance (that in the future, life extension tech will be invented) AT A CHANCE (that it actually will be applied to you after thawing).

Solid investment outlet I daresay

Anonymous No. 16118928

>>16117124
>yet
They will never "wake up". Its nothing but a very expensive meat freezer. There will be no magic future tech that can reverse all the damage from freezing, storage and thawing and then revive after. It's like alchemists seeking for the philosophers stone or to transmute lead to gold: just not how it works.

Anonymous No. 16118982

>>16118038
The F-35 is basically like alien tech though, in terms of its capabilities vis a vis stealth. If an F-35 were somehow sent back in time to 1976 and engaged 4 F-16's it could shoot all 4 of them down without being detected at all. That's a pretty big deal in terms of technological differences.

Anonymous No. 16118984

>>16118928
theoretically if shit didn't get damaged during freezing they should be able to have their brains fully scanned and rebuilt (sometime in the future). but not sure if anyone will do that for them.
we're billions out of which tens of millions are millionaires. it's going to be a long ass line and more and more will pile on it.

Anonymous No. 16119014

Didn't Musk say something about getting frozen? If anyone has the money and tech resources to make cryopreservation work it's him.

Anonymous No. 16119040

>>16118984
>brains fully scanned and rebuilt
That's exactly the kind of scifi magic I'm talking about. Never gonna happen, not how it works

Anonymous No. 16119043

>>16118984
>they should be able to have their brains fully scanned and rebuilt
Except those people WILL REMAIN FUCKING DEAD WHICH GOES AGAINST THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT.

It's unbelievable how many people are retarded enough to not understand the difference between an object and it's copy.

Anonymous No. 16119056

>>16118982
We’ve had stralth aircraft since the 70s.

Anonymous No. 16119074

>>16119040
>>16119043
>trust me bro
you don't know shit about shit

Anonymous No. 16119078

>>16119040
>>16119043
https://boingboing.net/2024/04/06/death-a-process-not-a-point-says-cutting-edge-research.html

Anonymous No. 16119121

>>16119074
>we'll just like scan the brain and then 3D print a copy and then we clone body and put the brain in. or we put the brain in a jar and plug it into a computer. it's gonna be just like in futurama.
>>16119078
>some function remaining an hour or two after death mens you can revive someone thats been in the freezer for 200 years

Anonymous No. 16119130

>>16119121
your primitive chimpanzee intuition is failing you and you resort to coming up with retarded shit.

Anonymous No. 16119150

>>16119078
>>16119074
> delusional retards coping this hard
I sincerely hope you freeze yourselves, especially decades in advances, "just to be sure" lmao

Anonymous No. 16119153

>>16119130
So, how is it gonna work?

Anonymous No. 16119155

>>16119056
And? We've also had spacecraft from the 60's, that doesn't mean all spacecraft are created equal.

Anonymous No. 16120163

>>16119155
Yeah, yes the Saturn V is far superior to Starship

Anonymous No. 16120195

>>16119121
>we'll just like scan the brain and then 3D print a copy and then we clone body and put the brain in.
This is pretty wild but "theoretically" doable if you can plug everything in. You could grow a clone from start, wait it out 15-20 years, make sure it doesn't form a brain, as in not more than vegetative state for body functions to work/develop, but no one home, no activity beyond the strictly bio functions.
Musk's Neuralink is dabbling with interfacing the brain to various shit, including severed nerves, bypassing the break.
What is hard is the cyber-brain. If we go only by number of neurons there's 100 billion of them, not considering their inter-conectivity (as data/values).
If I'd want to build a brain equivalent but large scale say 5 meters across in my backyard, and if I'd add 1000 neurons daily, which is what I'd maybe be able to tinker in a full day, it would take me some 270.000 years of daily adding 1000 neurons to said brain.
Their number is very high for dealing with them "individually" in human terms. Whatever "programmable" hardware is required to emulate brain activity, it's going to be insane tech.
Such a brain should be more easily connectable to some robot body with basic functions, walking around and seeing/hearing shit. Maybe such an option will be reserved for plebs when their original body dies and they wanna stick around for longer. Richfags gonna get that bio transplant treatment.

Anonymous No. 16120232

>>16120195
they did this in avatar 2

Anonymous No. 16120244

>>16120232
With the class system that will most likely turn into a dystopia, unless you are rich. You can build nice/interesting scenarios with the tech but that doesn't mean they can realistically happen.

Anonymous No. 16120375

>>16117054

your system still runs on blood?

Anonymous No. 16120677

>>16117054
>Is anyone realistically working on them?

Hypersleep pods don't make any sense without a hyperdrive, so one would think no

Anonymous No. 16120750

>>16117054
animals can be put into cryo-stasis for tens of thousands of years, as shown recently by some arctic worm.

the whole tech would go into adapting the body, by CRISPR and pharmaceuticals, not developing some weird colorful freezing ray.

we could absolutely send people to far away stars with 2050 tech

Anonymous No. 16120781

i have a hypersleep pod, i'll be your neighbor in the graveyard

the children once scientific advancement is possible will revive me .

Anonymous No. 16120783

>>16117088
i have also watch isaac arthur