๐งต Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Apr 2024 19:53:40 UTC No. 16117401
why so sure that black holes are a products of dead stars not CERN alike experiments that took place long before out civilisation started to be?
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Apr 2024 19:56:30 UTC No. 16117403
>>16117401
they would just become a blackhole instead of a planet, with the same mass and gravitational effects. still doesn't explain what is seen on skies.
if CERN made a blackhole that swallowed earth, moon would still orbit it, and it would still orbit the sun, like nothing else changed. that's it.
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 03:09:36 UTC No. 16117913
>>16117401
has anybody kept track of how many times CERN has created a black hole that swallowed the planet? My sense is that it is not really common, but what are the numbers?
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 03:17:14 UTC No. 16117920
would such a small blackhole be able to feed fast enough before it hawking radiates its shit all over?
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 03:22:54 UTC No. 16117923
what is it about black holes that makes them the number one most popular popsci topic of discussion amongst the brainlet soience fangoys?
is it the comic bookish aspects of the spectacular, unrealistic and completely non disprovable conjectures which go along with the topic that make black holes so popular amongst the scientist posers and wannabes?